![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Vintage Audio (record players, hi-fi etc) Amplifiers, speakers, gramophones and other audio equipment. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 6
|
Dear all,
I've just purchased a Trixette record player for restoration, which has a working BSR X1M cartridge in it. Is this crystal cartridge stereo compatible; am I safe to use it for playing stereo records?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Derby, UK.
Posts: 8,004
|
Short answer -- Yes.
The BSR "X" series of cartridges used natural Rochelle salt crystals, and were mono but stereo-compliant. The "SC" series were stereo ceramic. There may also have been "C" (mono ceramic) and "SX" (stereo crystal) ranges; just because I haven't encountered such, doesn't mean they were never made. As a rule of thumb, pretty much any cartridge with a flip-under stylus is stereo-compliant, whereas any flip-over cartridge isn't unless it is an actual stereo cartridge with 3 or 4 terminals; but I am ready to be proved wrong on this!
__________________
If I have seen further than others, it is because I was standing on a pile of failed experiments. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 6
|
Thanks for your reply, AJS. That's good to know. However, what you've said about flip over cartridges has raised another question. I bought a Dansette Major some time ago which had been partially restored. The tone arm had been fitted with a new flip over cartridge, which I thought was stereo compliant. It's a Varco TO45x; do you know anything about these cartridges?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Whittlesey, near Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Posts: 3,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hexode
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 268
|
Hi,
Unfortunately the X1M was not one of the stereo compatible BSR cartridges. The X1 range superseded the TC 8 range but remained mono only with no vertical compliance, although they used a flip under stylus assembly. The first BSR compatible cartridge range was the X3 introduced in 1967. The C1 was BSR's first stereo ceramic cartridge and was used in more upmarket players. It had a relatively low output of 110mv and a claimed tracking weight of 2-6 gms. It received a very favourable review in The Gramophone. Last edited by david freeman; 30th May 2012 at 5:55 pm. Reason: More information |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pentode
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 144
|
Interesting, very interesting.
This page has C1 cartridges for sale: http://www.adelcom.net/BSR%20Cartridges.htm I don't quite believe all the tech specs though. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hexode
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 268
|
Those specs bear no relation to those given by BSR in their technical data sheets when the C1 was introduced in 1964/5!
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 6
|
Dear All - Thanks for the info. So it now seems I need to replace the cartridge if I want to play stereo records on it. Would the C1 be a suitable replacement, then, and how cheaply can you get hold of them?
By the way, I've got a flip over cartridge in another player. It's a Varco TO45X, and it's new, I think. I was under the impression that it was stereo compatible, but I'm not so sure now. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pentode
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 144
|
So is this how it is?
The C1 is a stereo ceramic cartridge and was the first stereo cartridge from BSR, in about 1964. The X series are crystal cartridges, the X1 and X2 types were mono, non-stereo compliant. The X3 was the first crystal, mono, stereo compliant cartridge from BSR in 1967. The X4 and X5 types are later crystal, mono, stereo compliant cartridges. So were there ever any mono ceramic cartridges from BSR? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hexode
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 268
|
There were no mono ceramic cartridges from BSR.
BSR's first stereo cartridge was the TC8S which was a crystal 'Ful-Fi' model introduced in 1958, output 250mv, tracking weight 5-9 gms and a frequency response of 50 - 10000 c/s within 3db limits, according to the BSR data sheet. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 9,649
|
This sort of question comes up often.
Does anyone have a list of common cartridges and their basic parameters (ie mono/stereo/compatibility/high low etc. It doesn't have to be detailed, and can be refined as and when. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Derby, UK.
Posts: 8,004
|
Never heard of Varco, sorry.
![]() Also, I didn't know the X1 was mono-only. I'll watch out if I see one of those in a record player.
__________________
If I have seen further than others, it is because I was standing on a pile of failed experiments. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Madrid, Spain / Wirral, UK
Posts: 7,669
|
Do you mean vaco luxor? Does it have a screw-in stylus?
__________________
Regards, Ben. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 6
|
It has screw-in styli, but it definitely says 'Varco' on the cartridge. The cartridge in following link resembles mine exactly, except that the model number is different:
http://needleguy.com/product_info.php?cPath=114&products_id=...id=4ab720918115161ac17acba4ebccc0b5 |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Octode
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 1,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Madrid, Spain / Wirral, UK
Posts: 7,669
|
Quote:
__________________
Regards, Ben. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 6
|
OK, thanks, Ben. I hope it hasn't already done too much damage to my records. Have you any suggestions for a replacement. It's in a BSR UA8, I think. And with respect to the Trixette, would you recommend replacing the BSR X1M with a SC12H to compensate for output?
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Madrid, Spain / Wirral, UK
Posts: 7,669
|
In a word, yes. SC12H should do the job .
__________________
Regards, Ben. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 6
|
OK, thanks, again.
|
|
|