![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Vintage Audio (record players, hi-fi etc) Amplifiers, speakers, gramophones and other audio equipment. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 5
|
Hello all
I've just purchased a Garrard 50 mk 2 in a beautiful cabinet (I'll post more pictures soon) and I need a new needle/stylus. Could someone point me in the right direction? I don't really know where to start. Thanks Rich |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Derby, UK.
Posts: 8,005
|
We would need to see what kind of cartridge is fitted, in order to be able to tell you which stylus it requires. Can you get a clear picture of the underside of the headshell? (It looks as though it might be a removable one, which will make things easier.)
__________________
If I have seen further than others, it is because I was standing on a pile of failed experiments. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 5
|
Hi Julie
Thanks a million for helping me out with this. I've attached some pictures |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pentode
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ashford, Kent, UK.
Posts: 214
|
Pretty sure that's a Sonotone 3509 cartridge, just hoping the connections have not been soldered too ?. Cartridge was sometimes badged as Garrard KS40A ?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Whittlesey, near Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Posts: 3,776
|
Yes, that's either a Sonotone 3509 or a Garrard KS40A. The stylus is the same for both, and is available from Musonic. Just type Sonotone 3509 into their search box, and you'll find it. BUT, I would check that the cartridge is working before buying a stylus, because it looks as though the wires have indeed been soldered direct to the cartridge pins. If they have, then the heat may well have destroyed the cartridge. To test it, turn the volume right up and gently stroke the little rubber "ears" that stick out of the cartridge. If you hear a loud noise coming from the speaker, then all is well. If there is silence, or a very quiet noise, then sorry, but the cartridge has had it.
Barry |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 19,191
|
Do you just have the Garrard deck, or a complete system with an amplifier (and volume/tone controls etc.) too?
If the former, you might want to change the cartridge for a magnetic one anyway, so that it can be plugged into a standard hifi amp. The Audio Technica AT-91 would be ideal for this. N. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Heptode
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Suffolk Coastal, UK.
Posts: 603
|
Nick, please don't flame me for saying this, but I'm REALLY fond of later ceramic cartridges when correctly loaded. Who gives a darn about totally correct 'fidelity,' but the ceramics I have, including a much loved KS41C/3559 exhibit a wonderfully 'direct' kind of sound and sound fantastic on many 60's and early 70's 'pop' recordings and singles, which were obviously mastered for reproduction with this type of pickup I think.
The other thing is that the 50 turntable has an arm of high but perfect mass for these cartridges and a 41C stylus will track in this deck happily at 4g if mine is anything to go by ![]() By the way, if you don't play 78's, Musonic do a single diamond stylus for this cartridge (no flip-under) and this is what I usually use in mine. Having typed all this, I must resurrect my 60mk2 deck and play some singles...
__________________
Best wishes, Dave |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 19,191
|
Dave,
I love decent ceramics too. I suggested the swap merely because the OP might find it easier/cheaper if he intends to feed the output into a conventional hifi amp. OTOH, many ceramic cartridges aren't as good as they used to be. In particular, my beloved 9TAHCs now sound ropey (even with new styli), presumably because the rubber bits have stiffened up. N. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 5
|
Hello all
Thanks for all the replies, much appreciation from the vintage audio newbie here. Alas the cartridge is indeed soldered on but it seems to be working fine and the system is a complete system in a huge cabinet (which I love, I'll post pictures tonight). I've just jumped onto musonic and ordered the stylus. The next stop will be asking your advice on how to fit it. Thanks all! Rich |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Heptode
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Suffolk Coastal, UK.
Posts: 603
|
The stylus should sort-of snap in- not literally, but you get the drift I hope..
Nick, I have a 9TAHC original that still seems ok. maybe it has hardened up a little as most of the 'compliance' seems in the styli rather than the 'coupler' material. nothing like as bad as an Acos GP104 I have, which still sounds good to me, if perhaps a little 'sharper' in tone than I remember from long ago. The new SC12M sounds much the same, so I'm not worried particularly. One oldie that hasn't aged this way is the GP96-1 as fitted to Hacker record players, It was a bit dull in balance to start with (and the Gondolier amp is only 'flat' in the treble with the treble control at maximum I recall), but the one I have does have a 'grace' to it which is good on old worn records.. Anyway, I'm drifting well off topic and agree that an AT91/Rega Carbon is a fine and very cheap magnetic type for this deck, tacking at 2g or so, which it should manage if the mechanics are serviced carefully and trip pawls left 'dry.' Any more tracking pressure than 2g and the sound clogs up badly I found. If the arm and trip mechanism is VERY good in terms of friction and you can get a cheap Ortofon stylus balance for under a tenner, I'd even go as far as suggesting the sometimes similarly priced AT95E, again tracking at 2g or so. I've used both in the AT60 style of Garrards as well as the Stanton 500 (mk1 and V3) at 3g as well as the Ortofon OM Pro and GT at 4g.. Loads of options there, should anyone else be interested - cough.....
__________________
Best wishes, Dave |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 5
|
Hello all
It's in! The stylus arrived this morning and I've just given it it's first spin. It sounds great! Now I'm just looking forward to building my vinyl collection. Thanks for all your help, I would never have got it going without your advice. As promised, some pictures of the full setup. Rich |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Whittlesey, near Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Posts: 3,776
|
Wow! That is one smart radiogram. Glad you've got it sorted.
Barry |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Leominster, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 16,650
|
Does the radiogram itself have any maker's name or model number?
__________________
....__________ ....|____||__|__\_____ .=.| _---\__|__|_---_|. .........O..Chris....O |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 19,191
|
It's a late 60s DYNATRON stereogram, I think.
Here's the tabletop version: https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usedphotosuk/104405079_934.jpg |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 19,191
|
Or, smarter still: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/339247784403444054/
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 5
|
Hello gents
I wonder if I could impose on you all further. I'm using the radiogram all the time but it seems to run a little slowly on 33rpm. Do you know how I can adjust it to increase the speed? Thanks Rich |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Southwold, Suffolk, UK.
Posts: 9,166
|
You can't readily increase the speed on this. How you know it's running slowly? If it's "running slow" on 33, it's also liable be slow on all the other speeds as well. Download a Stroboscope first and then try it. If it is slow, we might then advise more. At last we know what that "nice big cabinet" is! It's one of the slighly better made late 1960s Dynatrons, before the inevitable slide into "Top Show Cheapo Nasties". Edward
|
|
|