UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > Specific Vintage Equipment > Vintage Telephony and Telecomms

Notices

Vintage Telephony and Telecomms Vintage Telephones, Telephony and Telecomms Equipment

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 7th Jun 2015, 2:44 pm   #1
keithinuk
Retired Dormant Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Posts: 208
Default Field telephones

This has probably been covered in the past, so forgive me for my ignorance, I have a common type F MK2 field telephone that I have had for some time and as you do I had to get another one to try them out, they do ring each other, but that's as far as I got to be honest.
The other one I have also had for some time is still a type F, but a MK1/1 and pretty much mint inside.
It is date stamped 1939, but made of aluminium, I wouldn't have thought aluminium was all that cheap in 1939, so what I'm asking is, is this set originally from that date.
Thanks.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0904.jpg
Views:	160
Size:	105.4 KB
ID:	109243   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0906.jpg
Views:	150
Size:	82.3 KB
ID:	109244  
keithinuk is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2015, 2:47 pm   #2
ThePillenwerfer
Octode
 
ThePillenwerfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 1,453
Default Re: Field telephones

The early ones were cased in aluminium but when the war started this was needed for more important things, like aircraft, so the cases were changed to Bakelite.

- Joe
ThePillenwerfer is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2015, 3:16 pm   #3
Dave Moll
Dekatron
 
Dave Moll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Cumbria (CA13), UK
Posts: 6,127
Default Re: Field telephones

First, my experience is that the MK I (with metal case), although not rare, is much less common than the MK II (bakelite) ones.

As to your problem, you don't mention what batteries you are using to power them. They would originally have had two "battery dry 1½V" cells (as shown below) in series, but they can be run off a pair of "D" (or "C") cells as the modern equivalent, and in a holder these fit quite well into the battery compartment.

If you are powering your sets successfully, your problem may lie within the carbon granule transmitter insets. Please note that if you replace the transmitter inset with the electret-type transmitter 21A, the voltage will need to be increased to at least 4½V for it to work. It is also worth checking that the receiver insets are not open-circuit. This can either be done with a resistance meter or by momentarily connecting a low voltage battery (a 1½V cell will do) across the receiver - which will make a crackling sound if it is working.

Another useful check, if one or both sets have a buzzer unit installed*, is to press the buzzer button adjacent to the handset plug and listen whether (a) the buzzer in the sending set is operating and (b) whether the buzzing is also audible from the receiving set - best not to hold the receiver too close to your ear as it's quite loud to be audible from a set with the receiver on-hook.

*This can be checked by opening up and seeing whether the induction coil removable unit (at the opposite end from the battery compartment) has a pair of thumbscrew knows on the top. The MK I should usually have a buzzer, but the MK II may not.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	battery-dry-no12.jpg
Views:	135
Size:	23.7 KB
ID:	109252  
__________________
Mending is better than Ending (cf Brave New World by Aldous Huxley)

Last edited by Dave Moll; 7th Jun 2015 at 3:22 pm. Reason: Whoops - forgot the image
Dave Moll is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2015, 7:39 pm   #4
keithinuk
Retired Dormant Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Posts: 208
Default Re: Field telephones

Would I be able to get away with, a 2v battery, as I did pick up two new C type 2v rechargeable batteries that I no longer have use for.
Both units look pretty much the same inside.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0908.jpg
Views:	173
Size:	118.9 KB
ID:	109268  
keithinuk is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2015, 11:22 pm   #5
J T Goldfinch
Retired Dormant Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Stevenage, Herts. UK.
Posts: 1
Default Re: Field telephones

New boy here with what I hope is useful information:

The photo shows the coil insert of the original buzzer variety, which has the two adjusting knobs on top. NB: If these had both been screwed down by someone trying to get the buzzer to work, they will make a shorted turn on the coil which seriously affects it properties as a telephone coil. They should be wound out so as not to contact while getting the speech part to work.

For the buzzer to work these are gently screwed in, assuming that the windings are intact, but if this is not successful it may/will be necessary to dismantle the coil enough to clean and flatten the moving contacts and round the ends of the screw-in contacts with a fine diamond hone or similar. This process is the same needed to get a Fullerphone chopper reliably operational. I have had recent experience in this with expert advice from someone in the services who knew.

John.
J T Goldfinch is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2015, 9:13 pm   #6
dagskarlsen
Heptode
 
dagskarlsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hakadal, Norway
Posts: 642
Default Re: Field telephones

The battery should be approx 3V, not more than 4.5
This powers the transmitter, and buzzer if installed.

The buzzer is not needed when you use these telephones, but may be nice to get working when the others works.

I have one probably made when it was difficult to get mateials for production of buzzers, the unit has only an induction coil (transformer) and no buzzer function.

dsk
dagskarlsen is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:09 pm.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.