![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Homebrew Equipment A place to show, design and discuss the weird and wonderful electronic creations from the hands of individual members. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#401 | ||
Pentode
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 128
|
![]() Quote:
Just wondering, Please the big things that look metallic. Are they the capacitors? 1 of them is 1 capacitor? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#402 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: London SW16, UK.
Posts: 645
|
![]()
[QUOTE=dmowziz;1525766]They are low-profile Faraday cages/ metal shields for SMD circuit boards that come with mounting clips. They are handy for high-frequency or microwave circuits and are cheaper alternatives to the metal housing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#403 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 20,905
|
![]()
They aren't Faraday cages, the metal is solid, so they also act on magnetic field components. Faraday screens are special, they are aligned grids of wires designed for purely electric field screening and are pretty much useless for general screening duties.
The idea behind the wire grids is that there is no path for circulating eddy currents. This is a very common confusion, but it's wrong. You'll find real faraday screens inside some transformers to block capacitive coupling between windings. These things are simple metal screening boxes, often plated steel or brass. They get soldered onto printed circuit boards over an area of componets doing something sensitive. Often the PCB has a groundplane area which acts as the lid, completing the screening box. They are a right pain for fault finding and access. They need a bigger soldering iron to remove them than they take to fit! David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#404 | |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: London SW16, UK.
Posts: 645
|
![]() Quote:
https://youtu.be/Lqwj5bACKbU The shields i got have clip-on bits that you are supposed to solve the de-soldering problem you mentioned. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#405 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 20,905
|
![]()
Some people suggested that the magnetic induction transformer was actually coupling energy capacitively. So Faraday invented his special shield, which blocks electric fields only to prove that the coupling had to be magnetic.
Unfortunately, some people automatically prefix the word screen with Faraday's name. Maybe they think it makes the screens appear screenier? But in reality from the point of screening radio signals, Faraday screens leak like a seive. It's comparable to prefixing every mention of the word 'Tyre" with the word "flat". But Faraday screen/cage/shield seems to have entered folklore. Lexicographers have their dictionaries change to follow newer usage, but this is science and we are talking specific and defined terms here where we can't let meanings change without trashing knowledge. Not being grumpy, just trying to defend something we need for accuracy. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#406 | |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: London SW16, UK.
Posts: 645
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#407 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: London SW16, UK.
Posts: 645
|
![]()
Incidentally I have been digging through the Black Hawk helicopter aerodynamic performance data ( to do with my job), I have noticed that there were 5 crashes caused by the Black Hawk flying close to radio broadcast towers. Subsequently they improved the EMI shielding of the avionics and flight controls. There were many similar incidents for other fixed wings and rotary wing vehicles in this NASA report:
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/...9960009442.pdf |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#408 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 20,905
|
![]()
Distance gets in on the act too. Far field in normally taken as 20 lambda from a source. Within that area, as you get nearer the source, you can find predominantly one field more than the other. Another factor is skin depth and then there is the permeability of the shield.
However, use of the prefix - Faraday takes care of all that and specifies a shield designed to pass magnetic components. And as we all learn in trying to screen things, electric components aren't too bad, it's the magnetic ones which are the devils. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#409 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: London SW16, UK.
Posts: 645
|
![]()
Before Christmas, I wrote that I was going to build another 6-gang tuner with an unbalnced dual gate mosfet mixer because I have three of the same military, silver-plated 6-gang air variable capacitors.
The attached schematic is the finished version 2 tuner. The design is very similar to the first version with a BJT mixer except it uses one inductive coupled tunable BPF and one capacitive coupled tunable BPF in the RF amp stages. Everything performs well as expected. The local oscillator has a buffer amp that drives gate 2 at a much higher signal level than the RF input from gate 1. The transconductance is amplitude modulated by the local oscillator "pump" voltage (see attachment 5). I installed a digital frequency display like the first version. It is getting harder and more expensive to obtain the original vernier tuning dial knob so I have used a cheapo chinese alternative which is over 180 degrees of rotation. It works Ok but not as good as the originals. My next projects will be the experimentation with a balanced dual gate mosfet mixer which is more difficult to implement. I consider building a 8-gang varactor tuning FM receiver...I have some ideas floating around but I nowadays spend much more time keeping fit since the start of the year and spend less time on electronic projects. Last edited by regenfreak; Yesterday at 4:29 pm. |
![]() |
![]() |