|
Vintage Tape (Audio), Cassette, Wire and Magnetic Disc Recorders and Players Open-reel tape recorders, cassette recorders, 8-track players etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
18th Apr 2010, 10:52 am | #41 |
Octode
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,969
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Yes that's the one Brian. My Magnette was a light green colour.
Great to find someone has one in their collection. Tim |
18th Apr 2010, 11:43 am | #42 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ramsbottom (Nr Bury) Lancs or Bexhill (Nr Hastings) Sussex.
Posts: 5,817
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
That Stuzzi is more a work of art Brian. Hi Tim, yes I agree that the Dolby A issue is not crucial and especially to this thread [that's why I mentioned my Akai so I wouldn't be too OT] but you have set us a challenge nontheless. If I can actually find any hard or soft evidence I'll start a Dolby thread [with the Mods indulgence]. Cheers Dave W
|
18th Apr 2010, 3:04 pm | #43 |
Octode
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,969
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
That's fine Dave. It wouldnt matter if I'm wrong on whether Seargent Pepper used Dolby. My essential point was that tape noise reduction systems were used professionally from some time in the mid 60's onwards with great success.
So far a quick internet search has uncovered one definite statement that Dolby was used on Pepper. One Professor Shlomo Maital cites four examples of technological innovation used on Pepper as being: 1.The use of the new Dolby Noise Reduction 2. Automatic Double Tracking 3. Varispeed 4. A novel method for pressing LP's (unspecified). I've just found another article which says that Abbey Road (the album) "was one of the first to use the Dolby Noise Reduction System". So there's a vote either way! Cheers Tim Last edited by TIMTAPE; 18th Apr 2010 at 3:22 pm. |
18th Apr 2010, 4:56 pm | #44 |
Nonode
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Dukinfield, Cheshire, UK.
Posts: 2,037
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
.
" at Strawberry Studios, Manchester, which was STUFFED with dbX." Interesting. I wonder if that's the reason all of 10cc's records sounded rather 'numb'? A sort of 'lack of space' around everything.
__________________
Andy G1HBE. |
18th Apr 2010, 5:04 pm | #45 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ramsbottom (Nr Bury) Lancs or Bexhill (Nr Hastings) Sussex.
Posts: 5,817
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Interesting Andrew. You could be right! Tim, perhaps we should ask George Martin? There was a recent experiment at Abbey Road where contemporary musicians tried to reproduce the sound using the same gear. I will have a look at that. I note that nobody has claimed a Studer or BTR as their favourite so far!
Dave W |
19th Apr 2010, 6:43 am | #46 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Posts: 40
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
I personally prefer no noise reduction at all. I belong to a Naktalk Forum, and the engineer in the group has written white papers on DBX, and on properly setup machines, along with properly setup DBX, its a great combination. Since all my decks are fully calibrated, as is my DBX sections, I get great recordings, with no breathing affects at all. I choose not to use the DBX, because then I have to remember which tapes were done with DBX, and play them back the same way. Or If I lend them out, the other person must have a DBX and deck in proper order. So, its just easiest not to use it. I dont mind a slight hiss, the ears get used to it. I was just making the point, that these anal Nak guru's choose DBX over Dolby, especially since all their decks are properly calibrated to begin with. And so are mine. I get great results with DBX, again, but choose to use no Noise Reduction. Ray
|
19th Apr 2010, 7:51 am | #47 |
Octode
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,969
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Ray,
In deciding whether to use Noise Reduction, and which type, one would normally take account of the demands of the programme itself. A rock performance that's loud from beginning to end doesnt demand much of the recorder's dynamic range. But a classical track that has very quiet as well as very loud sections will probably sound terrible on that same recorder. Hissy in the quiet sections and distorted in the loud bits. The latter case would be an obvious candidate for Noise Reduction. For many years I recorded live location lectures to cassette and always used both Dolby B and a limiter. Even with Dolby B it was still possible for a passionate orator to create serious "overs" and so the limiter was needed as well as the Dolby. Without those two expedients I would have had hissy and distorted recordings, plus, as time went on, annoying print-through echoes on the very thin cassette tape. As with music so with speech. Some people speak in a drab monotone and never raise their voice or lower it. Others have a very "dramatic" presentation. The live recording engineer has to be prepared for all types! Cheers Tim |
19th Apr 2010, 3:37 pm | #48 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paignton, Devon, UK.
Posts: 805
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Must admit, I wouldnt use DBX, Dolby A, B, C, SR, or HX as the machines I use have a sig to noise around the 65dB, you need to crank up the sound very high to hear the hiss on these machines.
just taken my latest machine, the Studer A820 which has just made its way right at the top of my favorite list |
19th Apr 2010, 10:28 pm | #49 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Posts: 40
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Same way I feel. My machines are just like yours, You'd really have to CRANK em up to hear the hiss. So, I can tune anything like that out, since its really not audible. Almost the same as playing Vinyl....you can tune out the slight hiss type sound you hear of the stylus, even on a Top of the Line Cartridge.....because the music is just so worth it!!! Ray
|
20th Apr 2010, 12:41 am | #50 |
Octode
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,969
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
If you're only making tape copies of a commercial production, such as a vinyl record, yes you can get away with poorer signal to noise because the compression/limiting of the dynamics has already been done for you. I was talking about tape recording live, where there's no such help.
Cheers Tim |
20th Apr 2010, 7:57 am | #51 |
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wembley, Middlesex
Posts: 7,223
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Many years ago, I recorded three friends singing and playing guitar on my then new Revox A77 ΒΌ track Dolby recorder.
The mics were not professional types, the Dolby was on, and the recording was very very good. I recently dug out the tape and replayed it on the same machine to digitize it and it sounded as fresh and lively as it did when I recorded it. |
20th Apr 2010, 8:24 am | #52 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kington, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 3,670
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
And so I should think - decent system, properly applied, decent machine. The A77 was commonly regarded in professional circles as sounding better than it had any right to at the price - and the incorporation of Dolby forced Studer to address one of the few weak points of the electronics, namely the impedances around the tape monitor switch.
Good show! |
20th Apr 2010, 8:50 am | #53 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 1,700
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Hi,
I have a rather small collection of machines, in number if not size. My favourite is this one. Fifteen years ago, a clearout where I worked threatened it with ending up in a skip if nobody else wanted it. I was the only person interested. I even managed to locate and retrieve the service manual, inside which was the factory test sheet. It's a Leevers-Rich Proline 2000, 1/4" half-track stereo, 7.5/15ips. The test sheet is dated 19/9/79. At the moment it's more a device for turning SP tapes into LP than anything. There is something very wrong with the tape-tension control circuitry. I'll get around to it eventually; at least I acquired a tape-tension gauge fairly recently so I'm running out of excuses for ignoring it... Cheers, Kat |
20th Apr 2010, 9:10 am | #54 |
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wembley, Middlesex
Posts: 7,223
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
The biggest problem with the Studers, Levers Rich's of this world is their physical size.
My wife is not exactly happy about the A77 and B77 that are in our house, but as I had the house and recorders before I met her..................... Unless you are on your own ie not married or living with someone, or you have a huge house, collecting these machines is not very practical. Up to a year ago, the computer system and a filing cabinet were in our dining room, whilst copying tapes, a Revox A700 stood on top of the filing cabinet. My wife said it couldn't stay there. I tried to argue that it was a thing ob beauty but she wouldn't have it! So after the copying was done, it went back to the workshop. |
20th Apr 2010, 10:55 am | #55 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paignton, Devon, UK.
Posts: 805
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
The Leevers Rich (Which they never made) has an issue with the crystal lock of the two capstan motors, but this unusual machine also has a odd tension system, it does not have tension sensors, instead, it calculates the rotating speeds of the left and right reel hub against the counter and then calculates the required tension.
|
20th Apr 2010, 11:00 am | #56 | |
Heptode
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paignton, Devon, UK.
Posts: 805
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Quote:
Can you tell if I am single? http://www.vintagerecorders.co.uk/se...tuder_a820.jpg |
|
20th Apr 2010, 11:32 am | #57 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wrentham, Suffolk, UK.
Posts: 508
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Quote:
You are so, SO lucky! Oh well, back to my 4000D......... Cheers, Roger. |
|
20th Apr 2010, 11:52 am | #58 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: West Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 1,700
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Hi,
I know very little about it, TBH. I just couldn't let it be scrapped. I think it's a Teknik SM2 in disguise; it's referred to as "The SM2" in one or two places in the manual. The tension servo is particularly interesting, though to set it up I think I'll have to work out what the "PS (programming switch) Clip" and "NR (numerical readout) Clip" referred to in the manual consist of. (I know where to connect them and how they're used in the set-up procedure.) I'll start a thread when I can get to it again and work on it, it's buried at the back of the "spacious dining/kitchen" (as it was described, before we moved in...) Cheers, Kat |
20th Apr 2010, 12:34 pm | #59 | |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 615
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
Quote:
I have the Recording The Beatles book which is every Anorak's dream with regard to the technology used in recording every track. For reference, the big leaps forward used on Pepper were: Addition of tom and hi-hat microphones Transition to C12 on bass Transition to U67 on guitar and piano Introduction of Direct Injection Introduction of phasing, flanging and chorusing Heavy use of the RS127 Presence Box Use of UTC equaliser Paul. |
|
20th Apr 2010, 12:37 pm | #60 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 615
|
Re: Favorite of my open reel decks???
The beer bottle without a coaster under it is the dead giveaway
For me, my favourites are my 2 B77s and my Akai 1710. I've also got a Sony TC-377 but its never really done much for me. I am hoping to add an A77 and a PR99 to the family soon though Paul Last edited by paolo; 20th Apr 2010 at 12:49 pm. |