UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > General Vintage Technology > Components and Circuits

Notices

Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 23rd Dec 2018, 10:23 pm   #1
Neil Purling
Nonode
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hull, East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 2,085
Default CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

To use a CR123 instead of two AA cells would I need to have a diode to 'lose' the difference in voltage?
If so. Which one?
Neil Purling is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2018, 10:32 pm   #2
trh01uk
Octode
 
trh01uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 1,652
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

The nominal voltage of a CR123A battery is 3 volts. Much like 2 x AA alkaline cells in series. Why do you need a diode at all?

Richard
trh01uk is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2018, 11:38 pm   #3
Neil Purling
Nonode
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hull, East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 2,085
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

I thought they were 3.7V or a different make-up of CR123 made the extra voltage when fresh.
It is purely a space consideration choosing this battery rather than a pair of AA's.
How many mAh is average vs the pair of AA for the same chemical make-up?
Neil Purling is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2018, 12:22 am   #4
Nuvistor
Dekatron
 
Nuvistor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,431
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

Primary CR123 Lithium batteries are 3 volt, rechargeable CR123 Li-ion are 3.6 volts.
Information from Wikipedia.
__________________
Frank
Nuvistor is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2018, 7:13 am   #5
Neil Purling
Nonode
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hull, East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 2,085
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

I was looking at the re-chargeable CR123.
I figured i'd need to lose 0.6V, assuming the voltage remained constant until the charge was exhausted.
Neil Purling is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2018, 8:25 am   #6
Diabolical Artificer
Dekatron
 
Diabolical Artificer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sleaford, Lincs. UK.
Posts: 7,657
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

Almost all things powered by batteries I've come across are tolerant of over voltage. I've powered 9v radio's off car batteries for instance without harm. 0.6v in the scheme of things is nowt.

Andy.
__________________
Curiosity hasn't killed this cat...so far.
Diabolical Artificer is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2018, 9:19 am   #7
trh01uk
Octode
 
trh01uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 1,652
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

While pondering this query I came across this post about problems with this specific battery format, which you might want to consider:

https://www.knivesandtools.co.uk/en/...ry-rcr123a.htm
trh01uk is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2019, 8:48 am   #8
Neil Purling
Nonode
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hull, East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 2,085
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

The little pocket radio kits I am making mean I am not drawing more than 10mA & the CR123 is for these. A re-chargeable CR123 would be OK here?
I know just how damn hot these cells can get if inadvertently shorted
Neil Purling is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2019, 4:04 pm   #9
Hunts smoothing bomb
Octode
 
Hunts smoothing bomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wimborne, Dorset, UK.
Posts: 1,407
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diabolical Artificer View Post
0.6v in the scheme of things is nowt.

Andy.

I'm always happy to be proved wrong but 0.6v in relation to a supply voltage of 3v is 20%

The appliances in my house run on 230v but I don't think I'd be willing to test that theory by winding them up to 276v on the variac...

Cheers
__________________
Lee
Hunts smoothing bomb is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2019, 5:08 pm   #10
Jolly 7
Octode
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Posts: 1,061
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

If I am not mistaken, the voltage of a fully-charged CR123 lithium battery will be 4.2 V, similar to a 18650 battery. That's quite a bit over the 3V or more expected from a fresh pair of AA alkaline cells. Personally I would be reluctant to use this long-term but I don't think it would cause any immediate damage as most 3V radio components would have higher voltage ratings. Some unregulated radio and Walkman AC adaptors often provide an output well over their specified voltage e.g. 9V instead of the rated 6V.

If using a CR123 is a must, a 3 V zener diode circuit might be the best solution. AFAIK there are no ICs that would regulate down to 3V without requiring a much higher input voltage. I am not fan of IC based voltage regulators in radio circuits as they can cause RF noise.

One important point is to make sure to add a fuse to the power supply circuit if using a rechargeable battery.

Last edited by Jolly 7; 10th Jan 2019 at 5:17 pm.
Jolly 7 is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2019, 5:15 pm   #11
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,996
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly 7 View Post
AFAIK there are no ICs that would regulate down to 3V without requiring a much higher input voltage.
Modern LDO regulators often only need a few hundred millivolts more supply than their regulated-output voltage.

Example - the TDA3663 which is used in laptops etc. to provide the 3.3V rail.
G6Tanuki is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2019, 5:20 pm   #12
Jolly 7
Octode
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Posts: 1,061
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

The TDA3663 is SMD only if I am not mistaken ?
Jolly 7 is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2019, 5:50 pm   #13
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,996
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly 7 View Post
The TDA3663 is SMD only if I am not mistaken ?
SO-8, yes. I generally solder these sorts of chips to something like this:

http://www.hobbytronics.co.uk/soic-dip-breakout-8-ht

so I don't lose the SMD chips if I sneeze. ((my most-recent bit of 'gash' electronics involved a NE602/SA602 type SMD chip as a mixer)).
G6Tanuki is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2019, 6:23 pm   #14
Jolly 7
Octode
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Posts: 1,061
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

It's the flu season after all
In your experience have you found RF noise being generated from the TDA3663 ? I once tried to use a 78LO5 in a radio circuit but was forced to remove it because of the interference from it.
Jolly 7 is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2019, 6:41 pm   #15
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,996
Default Re: CR123 rather than 2xAA cells

I've not had noise issues with the likes of the 3663 - or 78xx-series for that matter. I've used 78xx etc. to regulate the supply to VFOs/post-VFO buffer-amps and found the result to be a lot smoother than the classic resistor-Zener regulators.

But there again - anything with gain can oscillate if you tempt it correctly!
G6Tanuki is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 2:34 am.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.