UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > General Vintage Technology > Components and Circuits

Notices

Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 9th Apr 2019, 10:34 pm   #1
ColinK!
Triode
 
ColinK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
Posts: 12
Default Replacement Caps

Being new to rebuilding valve radios, I'm looking for a little advice about replacement caps'. I'm wondering where a direct value replacement isn't available, more often the case these days, is it better to go up or down to the next nearest value.

I'm currently rebuilding a Murphy TA160 and have found replacements for some of the cap's, but just as an example I'm wondering about C56 a 4uf electrolytic, do I go down to 3.3uf or up to 4.7uf ? Being that the paper caps are, Im guessing nearly 70 years old, I'm replacing them too, but again have the same issues with nearest values, up or down ?

Cheers.
ColinK! is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 10:54 pm   #2
bikerhifinut
Octode
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Penrith, Cumbria, UK
Posts: 1,540
Default Re: Replacement Caps

It probably doesn't make any real difference, I'm assuming also that the capacitors used may well have been 20% tolerance so the values may well be close to either of your alternatives.

A.
bikerhifinut is online now  
Old 10th Apr 2019, 7:30 am   #3
Diabolical Artificer
Dekatron
 
Diabolical Artificer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sleaford, Lincs. UK.
Posts: 4,655
Default Re: Replacement Caps

Up, electrolytic caps often have a -10%/+20% tolerance, from that it makes more sense to go up, but it doesn't really matter in most applications.

Andy.
__________________
Curiosity hasn't killed this cat...so far.
Diabolical Artificer is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2019, 8:31 am   #4
Lucien Nunes
Octode
 
Lucien Nunes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 1,756
Default Re: Replacement Caps

Up, generally. In many applications, such as HT decoupling and signal coupling, the capacitor simply has to be large enough to do the job. For economy the manufacturers will have used the smallest value meeting the requirements. A significant increase won't make any difference except size and cost, whereas a significant decrease might affect performance. The main exception is the HT reservoir, where using a vastly oversize cap can stress the rectifier.

In tuned circuits the actual value is critical, however the original caps are more likely to be mica or ceramic and probably won't need replacing anyway.
__________________
Three anodes good, six anodes better!
Lucien Nunes is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2019, 12:39 am   #5
ColinK!
Triode
 
ColinK!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.
Posts: 12
Default Re: Replacement Caps

Many thanks for your replies. Feeling a little more confident now and have ordered a pile of Caps, so hopefully I can get on with replacing them over the coming long weekend. Was lucky with the HT cap, found the exact value replacement, 16uf, which I believe is the correct one for the specified rectifier valve UU6. Unfortunately the valve was missing when I acquired the set, so has some diodes and dropper resister fitted temporally until I can locate one, but may become permanent.
ColinK! is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 6:43 pm.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2019, Paul Stenning.