UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > General Vintage Technology > General Vintage Technology Discussions

Notices

General Vintage Technology Discussions For general discussions about vintage radio and other vintage electronics etc.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 14th May 2018, 4:02 pm   #1
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,953
Default TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Pondering the makeup of an old-style analog TV signal, I wondered:

Why was the line-scan done by scanning a line then doing a hard 'flyback' ? It would have made more sense to me if the spot scanned alternately left to right and then right to left, so no need for the dumping of vast amounts of magnetically-stored energy from the line-scan coils. Swinging a spot from side to side would surely have been more efficient than doing a sawtooth?

The only downside I can see for this 'alternate' scan would be that by the time the spot got back to the side of the screen it started from, the phosphor glow would have diminished more so it could cause alternate lines to have slightly different brightnesses?
G6Tanuki is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 4:23 pm   #2
russell_w_b
Dekatron
 
russell_w_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Penrith, Cumbria, UK.
Posts: 3,684
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Quote:
Originally Posted by G6Tanuki View Post

The only downside I can see for this 'alternate' scan would be that by the time the spot got back to the side of the screen it started from, the phosphor glow would have diminished more so it could cause alternate lines to have slightly different brightnesses?
There would be no space for the line sync pulses which occur during flyback time, so a different method of synchronisation would need to be used. Also there'd be no 'back porch' and so no black level reference. So the overall picture black-levels would be all over the place!
__________________
Regds,

Russell W. B.
G4YLI.
russell_w_b is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 4:30 pm   #3
Dave Moll
Dekatron
 
Dave Moll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Cumbria (CA13), UK
Posts: 6,118
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

I would have thought that this Boustrophedon type of scanning method would also complicate the waveform to the scanning system, requiring sawtooths alternately of a rising and falling form.
__________________
Mending is better than Ending (cf Brave New World by Aldous Huxley)
Dave Moll is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 4:36 pm   #4
barrymagrec
Octode
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Morden, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 1,552
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Apart from the sync and black level problems already mentioned the raster would consist of a series of zig zag lines rather than a series of parallel scans.
barrymagrec is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 4:54 pm   #5
Nuvistor
Dekatron
 
Nuvistor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,428
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

I think we have to view this as to what was possible when the TV system was invented. To use a scan from side to side would have required the removal of interlaced scanning. This was introduced for two reasons, one flicker reduction and the other bandwidth reduction of the vision signal.

The bandwidth was a problem in that components for wide bandwidth and high gain were not easily available and would have raised the cost of transmission and reception equipment.

The side to side scanning would not reduce the problem of flicker, a higher repetition rate could have been used but that would complicate equipment design I.e more bandwidth and increase costs.

Just my thoughts, of course I could be completely wrong.
__________________
Frank
Nuvistor is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 4:57 pm   #6
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,953
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Hadn't thought about the back-porch issue; must admit, I've been thinking about this having recently done battle with a dot-matrix printer where the printing was bi-directional rather than doing-it-like-a-flyback-TV, and it just seemed such an obvious way of delivering a 'raster' that I wondered why it wasn't done!

Perhaps the original TV-standard designers also made some underlying acknowledgement to the difficulties of doing anything 'intelligent' while still accomodating baird/Scophony-style mechanical scanning? A Boustrephodon spinning-mirror scanner or Jeffree cell would be an intriguing animal to have to design!

Another thought: do the line- and frame-scans have to be linear? I'm thinking here that since most 'action' in a TV (or movie) image tends to take place in the centre of the screen - which is where the viewer's eyes naturally settle - a 'smart' TV system could use non-linear scanning in order to present greater detail in the centre of the screen at the expense of that at the outer edges.
G6Tanuki is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 6:03 pm   #7
russell_w_b
Dekatron
 
russell_w_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Penrith, Cumbria, UK.
Posts: 3,684
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Quote:
Originally Posted by G6Tanuki View Post
'a 'smart' TV system could use non-linear scanning in order to present greater detail in the centre of the screen at the expense of that at the outer edges.'
I think it would over-complicate things and, again, there'd be synchronisation issues: you'd need defined points of resynchronisation or a sort of sync 'frequency-hopping' as the image parameters change.

And you'd have to keep stagecoach wagon-wheels in one part of the screen, especially when viewed from the corner of one's eye! Unless you used a varying gradation of phosphors on the tube.
__________________
Regds,

Russell W. B.
G4YLI.
russell_w_b is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 6:47 pm   #8
PJL
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Seaford, East Sussex, UK.
Posts: 5,997
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Incompatible with mechanical scanning systems?
PJL is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 7:08 pm   #9
Cobaltblue
Moderator
 
Cobaltblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Exeter, Devon and Poole, Dorset UK.
Posts: 6,824
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

I suppose what you could do is an Apollo 13 excercise.

Only have what they had in 1936.

Then see what was possible.

And bear in mind valves were expensive so you couldn't throw unlimited bottles at the solution.

I suspect PJL's suggestion about mechanical scanning was a factor should be taken into account.

Cheers

Mike T
__________________
Invisible airwaves crackle with life or at least they used to
Mike T BVWS member.
www.cossor.co.uk
Cobaltblue is online now  
Old 14th May 2018, 7:09 pm   #10
GMB
Dekatron
 
GMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: near Reading (and sometimes Torquay)
Posts: 3,086
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Surely the main reason is that there would be no chance to get the "pixels" to line up vertically.

By sweeping each line in the same way, whatever the non-linearities of the scan it would at least be the same in each line.
By scanning alternate lines backwards the scan would have to be astonishingly linear and accurate otherwise large horizontal discrepancies would be very obvious between adjacent lines.

I am sure this is overwhelmingly the reason. I think it would even be hard to make a CRT system work that way properly with modern technology.
GMB is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 7:15 pm   #11
Radio Wrangler
Moderator
 
Radio Wrangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,803
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Any delay in sync to the scan running shifts existing technlogy pictures a little sideways but doesn't do any damage.

with reciprocating scand, alternate lines get shifted right and left confusing the picture. MUch more noticeable.

David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done
Radio Wrangler is online now  
Old 14th May 2018, 7:45 pm   #12
PaulM
Hexode
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Near Lincoln, UK.
Posts: 481
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

I tried to do this years ago on a new design of linear scan (power amplifier driven) flight simulator monitor. It was a very high resolution 26" delta-gun job with no expense spared. The snag was that a hybrid power amplifier driving the line scan very precisely still needed fast flyback to get it back to the start of the line within the blanking period.

There were three solutions. One was a high voltage asymmetric supply power amplifier capable of carrying out the flyback voltage excursion. The second was an 'injector' whereby a high voltage was switched in during flyback and the third was 'zig-zag' scan, as it became known, or Boustrophedon if you're posh.

The injected higher voltage needed for flyback wasn't too bad as the coils were low inductance although we were running 64 KHz line scan, but we still decided to try zig-zag scan. What a rabbit hole that turned out to be!

Firstly, you need a staircase field scan otherwise the lines cross in the middle. That took a while to organise but with digits it wasn't too bad. Then we thought that we would be in business by programming the video source (an IG - Image Generator) to display backwards/forwards video. Oh what a mess! The timing was all up the shoot and so the digital video had to be fed into a line store with adjustable timing. Almost there now, but it wouldn't line up left to right - you could have one or the other - a sort of linearity issue. That turned out to be a magnetics issue in the deflection coil but we could just about correct that with a switched linearity corrector. Boy, this was getting complicated, but it now looked good on green. Then we switched on blue and red and realised that although we had frigged the convergence waveforms for zig-zag, all our fancy zoned digital corrections didn't work anymore and the convergence was really complicated to sort out. Might have been OK on a PIL tube, but what a shebang on a delta gun. In the end we had to abandon it and go for the switched high voltage solution, but I didn't half learn a lot along the way!

Zig-zag? No thanks!

Best regards,

Paul M
PaulM is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 7:46 pm   #13
kan_turk
Hexode
 
kan_turk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 396
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Not to mention the complications at the origination end - cameras etc etc - not a runner!
kan_turk is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 7:55 pm   #14
Dave Moll
Dekatron
 
Dave Moll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Cumbria (CA13), UK
Posts: 6,118
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Quote:
Originally Posted by G6Tanuki View Post
'a 'smart' TV system could use non-linear scanning in order to present greater detail in the centre of the screen at the expense of that at the outer edges.'
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJL View Post
Incompatible with mechanical scanning systems?
Actually, Baird's 30-line system did just that, except that with vertical lines top to bottom he did it by increasing the width and spacing of the outer lines.
__________________
Mending is better than Ending (cf Brave New World by Aldous Huxley)
Dave Moll is offline  
Old 15th May 2018, 6:19 pm   #15
Brigham
Octode
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Co. Durham, UK.
Posts: 1,111
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

There were proposals for 'each-way' scanning using vibrating mirrors. I believe Dénes Mihály had a go.
Brigham is offline  
Old 15th May 2018, 11:17 pm   #16
julie_m
Dekatron
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Derby, UK.
Posts: 7,735
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

It would have been a nightmare to align the end of one scan line with the beginning of the next.

At least if the electron beam is always moving in the same direction, any delay as the signal works its way through the circuit will shift the image in the same direction. If the beam reversed on each line, then "later" would be to the right when travelling left to right, but to the left when travelling right to left. The resulting distortion would be a nasty "tearing" effect.

A dot matrix printer can print text in both directions, but this is because your eyes are less sensitive to vertical misalignment of evenly spaced rows of horizontal text -- even if it's monospaced. But most dot-matrix printers switch to one-way mode for graphics to improve the vertical alignment between dot positions. I am sure my old Citizen used to let you force it to print graphics in two-way mode, but warned against this in case of unsatisfactory results.

(It also had a test mode in which it just printed rows and rows of the letter H, for testing the horizontal alignment. There was a potentiometer which presumably set the threshhold for an optical sensor, and thus the position within the beam width at which it knew to start printing on the backward pass.)
__________________
If I have seen further than others, it is because I was standing on a pile of failed experiments.
julie_m is offline  
Old 16th May 2018, 9:23 am   #17
Argus25
No Longer a Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 2,679
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

I think the advantages of sawtooth raster scan are too great to improve on for analog representation of an image on a CRT.

In the case of the H scan, the flyback is so rapid that the beam energy delivered to the phosphor is very very low. Normally only the H scan line is seen, not the H retrace, though the H retrace is blanked in some professional monitors and computer monitors.

The V retrace is not fast enough to be effectively self blanked as it is slower and ideally the TV set has retrace blanking.

I think though the linear sweep for H & V, with a flyback, was simply a "logical and practical way" to evenly distribute the picture elements over time with even illumination on the CRT face.

Then it turned out that the H retrace interval and the L & C energy changes associated with it, had "huge utility value" in generating auxiliary voltages and EHT and in energy recovery scanning. The vertical scan & its flyback was less helpful in this respect. Also, in very early CRT TV's, a sawtooth wave was easy to generate.

So while it could "work" using a zig-zag scanning method for the H scan, for example a triangle wave with flat tops & bottoms to allow for sync and porch time, the utility value of the H flyback energy changes would be lost and nothing else obvious would be gained in its place to make it worth it. Also the time bases would be more difficult. It would still then require a vertical sawtooth scan to get the beam back to the start.

I have attached an interesting oscillogram (photo of CRT face) of how a raster scan is constructed...can anyone guess how this image was created ?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	raster.jpg
Views:	125
Size:	84.5 KB
ID:	162962  

Last edited by Argus25; 16th May 2018 at 9:32 am.
Argus25 is offline  
Old 16th May 2018, 11:22 am   #18
Al (astral highway)
Dekatron
 
Al (astral highway)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argus25 View Post

I have attached an interesting oscillogram (photo of CRT face) of how a raster scan is constructed...can anyone guess how this image was created ?
Hmm... I'll take an intutive go at it..

Sampling the current in the deflection yoke on one axis of the scope, and the current in the vertical deflection yoke on the other?

Is it showing hysteresis?
__________________
Al
Al (astral highway) is offline  
Old 16th May 2018, 12:29 pm   #19
Duke_Nukem
Octode
 
Duke_Nukem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 1,268
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Vertical = frame scan current.
Horizontal = some mix of frame and vertical scan currents + some odd/even field component from somewhere ? Or, vertical scan added to a ramp oscillator running at field rate / 2 (if your scope allows modulation of x-axis then regular scope scan could be used)

Whatever, quite neat !

TTFN,
Jon
Duke_Nukem is offline  
Old 16th May 2018, 1:05 pm   #20
Al (astral highway)
Dekatron
 
Al (astral highway)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
Default Re: TV horizontal scanning - why flyback?

Quote:
Originally Posted by astral highway View Post
Sampling the current in the [horizontal] deflection yoke on one axis of the scope
Oops, forgot the important qualifying word!
__________________
Al
Al (astral highway) is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 4:32 pm.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.