6th Oct 2019, 12:54 pm | #81 |
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Glasgow, UK.
Posts: 1,840
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
I've used the voltage chart on page 11 of the KB service manual previously and you will see my valve pin readings in a couple of Posts above. My specific point related to Mike's (crackle) annotations on the schematic where there is nothing shown for V1 Pin 3 (cathode). I appreciate that page 11 of the KB service manual states that this should be 1.0V.
Rechecking all my voltages it is clear that the HT is low right across this set and this can be traced back (?) to the output from the Westinghouse rectifier which is only 181V DC from an AC input of 205V. The KB service manual states that this should be 235V DC, Mike's annotation shows 218V DC while the Trader Service Sheet 1233 states 225V DC. So I'm at least 20% down on what the rectifier DC output should be - as David G4EBT has advised me "The AM and FM frequency changer must be close to losing oscillation." So I'm going to focus my attention on the low HT and replacing the rectifier - my options would appear to be to install four 1N4007 silicon diodes or a modern solid state bridge rectifier? Looking more generally at the low volume on FM I remembered some advice from a previous restoration from boxdoctor (Tony) that: - "Once the signal strength is enough to operate the limiter action in the I.F.amplifiers, the volume of the output will not materially increase further, regardless of any further increase in input signal. The proof of the effectiveness of the aerial will ultimately be revealed on the improvement to weaker stations, which will show mainly as an improvement in signal-to-noise ratio, i.e. less background 'hiss'." - interesting?
__________________
BVWS Member |
6th Oct 2019, 1:32 pm | #82 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,788
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
It's normal to have to replace the metal rectifier in these. You can use any suitably rated bridge, with either 4 separate diodes or a dedicated bridge. Use a 100-300 ohm resistor in the HT line to limit the switchon surge and reduce the HT voltage. You may want to experiment with the value so that the HT is absolutely spot on, but it's not really necessary.
Ideally you would use fast rectifiers such as UF4007s in the bridge to minimise noise, but bog standard 1N4007s will probably be fine. |
6th Oct 2019, 2:32 pm | #83 | ||
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Glasgow, UK.
Posts: 1,840
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
Quote:
KB service manual: 235V DC, Mike's annotation: 218V DC Trader Service Sheet 1233: 225V DC. Somewhere in the middle is where I'd aim for? Quote:
https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/recti...iodes/6715470/
__________________
BVWS Member |
||
6th Oct 2019, 2:38 pm | #84 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,788
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
The HT voltage isn't all that critical, so it looks as if 220-230V would be fine.
The diode in your link should be as good as any. I mentioned the UF4007 as an example of a cheap fast recovery diode that would do the job, but there are many other types that would work just as well. |
6th Oct 2019, 10:09 pm | #85 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Basildon, Essex, UK.
Posts: 4,100
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
You may find it easier to mount a bridge rectifier, for instance one with a hole for mounting direct to the chassis, rather than 4 separate diodes. (bit of an overkill on current wise but that wont do any harm. https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/bridg...fiers/1656141/)
It is quite possible that the selenium rectifier is not performing correctly, but I have not had to replace one of these in a KB set yet. The questions I would be asking my self now are; Can anything else be pulling the voltage down? Have I replaced all of the paper capacitors including all the crumbling hunts and any of those little double ended bullet shaped ones? (they look similar to resistors and normally seem to be 1nF brown black red, I cant remember if there are any in this radio) Is V5 cathode resistor correct, and the cathode/grid voltage correct? Mike Last edited by crackle; 6th Oct 2019 at 10:19 pm. |
7th Oct 2019, 8:46 am | #86 | |
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Glasgow, UK.
Posts: 1,840
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
Quote:
Not sure though how those would affect the voltage back at the rectifier where I am only getting 181V DC?
__________________
BVWS Member |
|
7th Oct 2019, 11:54 am | #87 |
Nonode
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Bristol, UK.
Posts: 2,368
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
It's worth trying a replacement diode regardless as they are so cheap and cheerful. You can get 50 x 1N4007 here for £1.49 + P&P https://store.brightcomponents.co.uk...ode-50-pieces/ . I haven't found noise to be a problem in domestic receivers. Cheers, Jerry
|
7th Oct 2019, 1:08 pm | #88 | |
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Glasgow, UK.
Posts: 1,840
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
Quote:
It may even fit inside the existing metal rectifier case?
__________________
BVWS Member |
|
7th Oct 2019, 1:59 pm | #89 | |
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Glasgow, UK.
Posts: 1,840
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
Quote:
V5 voltages are: - Pin 3 Cathode: 3.42V Pin 7 Anode: 164V Pin 9 Screen: 153V
__________________
BVWS Member |
|
7th Oct 2019, 2:56 pm | #90 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
I think Mike was hoping for the actual value of the cathode bias resistor as well as the voltages, that way it can be established by Ohms law what the state of things are with regard to the valve and its effect on the HT voltage etc.
Lawrence. |
7th Oct 2019, 4:16 pm | #91 |
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Glasgow, UK.
Posts: 1,840
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
Oops, sorry - got my grid and bias resistors confused!
Looking at Trader Service Sheet 1233 I think that the cathode bias resistor is R26 (KB service manual R25) which should be 100Ω - this has been replaced and is measuring 99.8Ω in circuit. The voltage on Pin 2 of V5 is 3.2V.
__________________
BVWS Member |
7th Oct 2019, 6:01 pm | #92 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Basildon, Essex, UK.
Posts: 4,100
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
If measuring the grid voltage it should be measured between grid (pin2) and cathode (pin3), not chassis.
The result should always be negative with regard to the cathode. You can also measure the voltage across the cathode resistor, (cathode to chassis), that will normally be the same as the grid voltage but it will be positive with regard to chassis. Knowing the voltage across the cathode resistor will enable you to get a rough indication of the current through the valve.. Mike |
7th Oct 2019, 6:34 pm | #93 | ||
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Glasgow, UK.
Posts: 1,840
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
BVWS Member |
||
7th Oct 2019, 6:46 pm | #94 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
If measuring the voltage between the cathode and the grid you need to be aware of the loading effect of the meter, especially with an analog or some of the cheapo DMM's.
Scenario....The chassis to cathode voltage across a 100 ohm resistor is actually say 4.5 volts, but you measure between cathode and grid with a DMM that has a 1meg input resistance, the grid return resistor is say 680k, the voltage indicated will be approx. 2.69 volts (bad enough) With a 20kohm per volt analog meter set to the 25 volt range and measuring between the same two points the voltage indicated will be approx. 1.9 volts With the same meter set to the 10 volt range the voltage indicated will be approx. 1 volt In reality the actual voltage at the grid would be 4.5 volts.... All circuits are potential dividers: https://www.electronics2000.co.uk/ca...calculator.php Lawrence. Last edited by ms660; 7th Oct 2019 at 6:55 pm. Reason: word swop |
7th Oct 2019, 10:59 pm | #95 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Seaford, East Sussex, UK.
Posts: 5,997
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
R=100, V=3.2 and I=V/R so the cathode current is 32mA which is very much less than the trader values for combined anode and screen current of 44mA. It is therefore not the EL84 pulling the HT rail down.
It's a long thread and I am not sure if you have replaced the 3 way electrolytic but if you have then this almost certainly confirms the rectifier needs replacing. |
8th Oct 2019, 1:59 pm | #96 |
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Glasgow, UK.
Posts: 1,840
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
Thanks for your input PJL.
(All references below are to the KB service manual.) The HT smoothing electrolytics have not been replaced - they are measuring: - 1st electrolytic C39 (30μF) : 181V should be 235V as we already know 2nd electrolytic C37 (20μF) : 159V should be 214V 3rd electrolytic C36 (10μF) : 142V should be 198V One of the HT smoothing resistors i.e. R22, has been replaced: - R22 : 1kΩ - Measuring 991Ω and 17.8V R24 : 820Ω - Measuring 902Ω and 21.6V
__________________
BVWS Member |
8th Oct 2019, 2:38 pm | #97 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,788
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
The numbers you are measuring seem broadly OK to me, apart from the low HT.
|
8th Oct 2019, 2:57 pm | #98 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
According to what's been measured the rectifier is on its way out....Vout from the rectifier is less than Vin, could have gone from full to half wave due to being overstressed or an age related internal contact problem.
Lawrence. |
8th Oct 2019, 3:17 pm | #99 |
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Glasgow, UK.
Posts: 1,840
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
What I did next was to disconnect the HT + connection at the rectifier, and to connect my meter on the DC mA range between the rectifier + tag and the HT lead, so that the meter was in series with the HT line.
On FM : 55mA (should be 75mA) On AM : 53mA (should be 70mA)
__________________
BVWS Member |
8th Oct 2019, 3:27 pm | #100 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,788
|
Re: Kolster-Brandes MR10
The rectifier is obviously knackered. The current consumption will be reduced if the HT is low, so your numbers are again plausible.
|