26th May 2012, 7:41 pm | #141 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: N.W. Oxfordshire(Chipping Norton)
Posts: 7,306
|
Re: This forum
Presumably most members are aware that some other forums, such as, e.g., diyaudio.com., allow limited commercial advertising (usually by companies in the electronics industry, IIRC-haven't visited DIY Audio lately) and voluntary donations. I believe Hi Fi Engine and Vinyl Engine both operate in a similar manner. Might something along these lines be a way to finance this forum too?
Like others, I would be prepared to pay a modest fee or make donations to help if need be. |
26th May 2012, 8:08 pm | #142 |
Heptode
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Duffort, Gers, France
Posts: 714
|
Re: This forum
This site:
http://www.cigarettecardcollecting.com/ finances itself by allowing advertizing to be inserted. It's easy to ignore it so it isn't too intrusive. Might be another way of doing it. I'm sure the webmaster could provide further details if necessary.
__________________
Stuart The golden age is always yesterday - Asa Briggs |
26th May 2012, 8:41 pm | #143 |
Octode
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Willand, Devon, UK.
Posts: 1,023
|
Re: This forum
I've always thought advertising on websites lowers the tone and clutters everything up, especially if you don't have a large monitor. I'd be more than happy to pay to use this forum if it means advertising is avoided.
|
26th May 2012, 8:48 pm | #144 |
Heptode
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Dorset, UK.
Posts: 519
|
Re: This forum
Forums such as those provided by Yuku in the USA have a scheme where, for example every $10 paid, the system will remove adverts for 50,000 page views. Each member can decide on how many adverts are tolerable and subscribe accordingly. The downside is that adverts will be a bandwidth hog for those on dial-up or with slow ADSL connections.
Cheers Rich
__________________
To an optimist a glass is half full; a pessimist half empty; an engineer twice as big as need be! |
26th May 2012, 9:27 pm | #145 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bristol, UK.
Posts: 981
|
Re: This forum
Hi,
I did send a PM to Paul but I think it probably went somewhere. I would be more than willing to put a few quid in the kitty. This happened to a forum that I frequent reasonably often and it worked out at something like 60P per month. This is not a suggestion price wise for this forum but just used as an example. I don't think that we can afford to lose this invaluable resource. Cheers, Geoff. |
26th May 2012, 10:36 pm | #146 | ||
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,820
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
Having come back to this thread after a day away from the PC, the one thing that strikes me is how passionate people are about this forum. Quote:
True, colllecting old radios may only be a silly old hobby, but it's a wonderful distraction from the harsh realities of day-to-day life, and I'm sure has been responsible for keeping many of us sane Nick |
||
26th May 2012, 10:48 pm | #147 |
Octode
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Newport, Gwent, UK.
Posts: 1,623
|
Re: This forum
Hi,
Without this forum I might well be reduced to sending myself a Christmas card (as in Mr Bean). I have made several friends on here. Michael |
26th May 2012, 11:24 pm | #148 |
Pentode
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Forres, Moray, UK.
Posts: 194
|
Re: This forum
If the forum stayed separate from the BVWS, I'd be willing to put something in the kitty, despite not being half as active at the moment as I'd like to be. A few pounds a year is not much for the information exchanged here. I would however, at the very least, expect some form of financial accountability, and preferably organisational accountability also. It has always struck me as a very well run forum for the vast majority of the time, but that doesn't mean that accountability would not go amiss. It is the de facto forum for the hobby, at least in the UK, and with the power that represents then saying that if you don't like it you can always leave, whilst entirely true, is an abuse of that power.
Alternatively I would be more than happy to see it go under BVWS management, if that was possible. Thats possibly not the best way of putting it though - as I'd hope the BVWS would delegate the day to day running to the current team of mods, who may or may not be BVWS members. As a BVWS member I would have no objection to it still being a public forum. I wouldn't feel miffed at all in indirectly subsidising other's free access - though perhaps it is fair if non-members should pay a small fee to have posting rights? I wouldn't under any circumstances want to see it be totally private with neither read nor write access unless that person has paid - I think that would be a shot in the foot for the hobby, the forum itself, and maybe the BVWS. A forum is not just a source of information, its a marketing device for that which it represents - be it the hobby, the forum itself as a body, or any body (e.g. the BVWS) that might take ownership in the future. -- Tim. |
26th May 2012, 11:49 pm | #149 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
But, other posts - there could be no reason to keep them. This thread is 150+ posts already, with no technical content whatever. So if in the fullness of time the whole thread were to be deleted, then it would not be much of a loss. Sure, members' post counts would go down a bit, but I would not lose much sleep about that. |
|
27th May 2012, 12:00 am | #150 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fakenham, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 4,246
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
Paul |
|
27th May 2012, 12:19 am | #151 |
Nonode
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Virginia Water, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 2,872
|
Re: This forum
I have watched this generally very well-mannered debate proceed with interest, but have felt I can add little.
As a recently-retired chap this forum has changed a minor hobby back into the passion it was years ago. So: The BVWS might chose to make an ex-gratia payment to help the forum. It can afford it. Not full costs, just a contribution.U The BVWS is not the right body to run an open forum but should encourage it. I for one like the idea of users from all backgrounds having open, free access. A lot of people myself included will happily press a "donate now" button as soon as one is installed. Donations are a healthy way of funding. Subscriptions imply a sort of inertia and are less satisfying to the individual. I happen to think that firm regulation is better than anarchy but that consistent and transparent regulation is essential. As for culling data, I can't believe that an "archive" section can't be provided. I ran a large mySQL database for a while and regular archiving was essential to keep performance up. But the archive is stall accessible. This is not a major contribution to the debate, but thanks to Paul et al for sticking with it so I can associate with such a helpful and generous bunch of forum members. - Jeremy
__________________
Jeremy, G8MLK, BVWTVM Friend, VMARS, BVWS Secretary. www.pamphonic.co.uk www.bttt.org.uk |
27th May 2012, 12:23 am | #152 |
Heptode
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 990
|
Re: This forum
We have been told on several occasions now that the size of the forum content in terms of the space it occupies on a hard drive is not the problem, rather the volume of traffic accessing various threads loading the server.
That being the case could someone please explain why the 'skip' of 46000 posts, which was already inaccessible to members, needed to be deleted at all to reduce server load. Surely because it was inaccessible it would have no bearing on the volume of traffic whether it existed or not? Regards |
27th May 2012, 12:40 am | #153 |
Octode
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Posts: 1,522
|
Re: This forum
Ok, it seems clear that members here appreciate and value the archive of material here, an excellent example being the Avo 8 survey.
It is also quite clear the majority are willing to pay for this, especially if this ensures it's preservation. But we also want to maintain a forum that is free to use and unilateral. Passing members are to be welcomed, even encouraged. They'll come back eventually. No badges declaring who's paid up and who hasn't. We also need a mechanism to remove the dross democratically. So here's the idea. All forum posts can be viewed for up to six weeks after the last post. During that time, any member can nominate it for archive. This could be achieved with a button, similar to the report post button. If after six weeks it has received no nominations, then the post is deleted. To view the archive, there is a annual fee. This would subsidise the "free" forum. If people want to ask the odd simple question, that's fine. These are usually answered in a matter of hours, even minutes. If people want to go back and look at historical data, then this is a value added service and is only right this should be charged for. So, we will need to appoint a curator. You may have just talked yourself into a job, Jeffrey. On a final note, and I apologise now for being flippant, I can't help but think of the poor child who has just discovered that Tony Hart doesn't actually keep all the paintings he has been sent. Cheers, Rob.
__________________
We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing. |
27th May 2012, 1:05 am | #154 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fakenham, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 4,246
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
All else aside, why create more work for someone when, apparently, pretty much everything has been working really quite well here but for the requirement of some cash to secure adequate and unproblematic hosting with accommodation for all that anyone's ever cared to say? There seems ample evidence in this thread that a good many of us are ready, willing and able to dip our hands into our pockets in that cause, without looking for any privileges, simply to maintain the forum we have come to know and to value. Paul |
|
27th May 2012, 1:19 am | #155 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: This forum
To clarify things, why don't we have a forum rule to state something like "The moderators of this forum reserve the right, without reason or notice, to edit, move or permanently delete any content posted on this forum"?
Regards David
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/ My Nixie Clocks |
27th May 2012, 2:28 am | #156 | |||
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK.
Posts: 749
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
|
|||
27th May 2012, 2:40 am | #157 |
Heptode
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 990
|
Re: This forum
I for one have no intention of trying to write technically accurate posts, to the best of my ability, for the benefit of other members only to have them deleted without apparent just cause . Perhaps you are happy to waste your time, I am not.
|
27th May 2012, 3:35 am | #158 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK.
Posts: 749
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
I fully accept that we must pay for goods or services that we use, and am fully prepared to do so...but... IMHO, We need to be very careful how we proceed. If I am a paying customer, I will have a different idea of what I pay money to accept. As a free member I have the choice to accept OR not the Moderation and style of the Forum as it stands (which is "If you don't like it...the door is over there) That's fine BUT If I am to be a paying customer, I will want to be treat as one ( a company who treats it's paying customers with this attitude will soon have no customers left) I would not pay to be given a lesson in English with my mistakes highlighted in red (are the moderators all qualified English teachers?) As far as thread deletion is concerned... I would err on the side of caution when deleting threads as lots of good info could be lost, but if we really do need to loose threads why not start with things like the CATS thread before a technical one. I love the little critters as much as anyone, but if we need the space...come on! I also noticed a recent post about the Olympic Torch was locked as OT for this forum, yet the CAT thread is not?? We need a consistent rule, and it must be seen to be fair...That was not. If I pay for a service it needs to be a much more professional and polished, accountable version of the current "Privately owned house arrangement" If I open my house as a free coffee shop I can institute as many rules as I like, but if I open a shop to sell coffee I will need to be a whole lot more on the ball, otherwise I will loose customers and go bust. I really do not want to see us self destruct here guy's, I am not a word perfect typist, I am an Anorak that loves old telly's, video recorders and for most here radio's, so are most of the people reading this Forum, we really don't need to have a grammatically perfect Forum with perfect capital letters and full stops, as long as it is readable and not in text speak...Do we? History tells us of someone else who wanted a perfect world with perfect people...and look what happened to him! Let's not look for differences to squabble about, save that for the Electricity or Gas companies...or those annoying bs that try to sell us things on our doorsteps We have a great hobby and a couple of great places to chat to other like minded guy's (and Girls) Do we really want to see it all go just because we can not agree on how to talk to each other? PS. Just because I am not paying for this yet, don't highlight the myriad of mistakes that I have no doubt made in red |
|
27th May 2012, 7:30 am | #159 |
Octode
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southport, Merseyside, UK.
Posts: 1,156
|
Re: This forum
I think post #158 by Chris, repairman 1234, more or less sums up how I feel as well, on the few occasions that I've made a typing error which has been highlighted, or a post disappearing without explanation ( and I'm very careful when posting in view of the moderation policy ) I've never queried these as doing so would no doubt bring a response something like “the forums free, if you don't like it go and play somewhere else”, now I've accepted this on a free forum, but would strongly object to paying to be on a forum where I'm transported back 65 years to my days in infants school for making the odd mistake.
John. |
27th May 2012, 8:29 am | #160 | |
Octode
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Posts: 1,522
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
I'm just trying to find a solution that will work and be agreeable to all. How about if the achive had a preview function, so it does appear on search engines, perhaps with reduced sized thumb nails and the first couple of lines of text. In fact maybe something as simple as the size of photo accessible, I'd gladly pay to be able to post or view larger photo's. Like it or not, the service is going to have to be paid for somehow, to keep the cash flowing some sort of incentive has to be offered. Rob.
__________________
We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing. |
|