|
General Vintage Technology Discussions For general discussions about vintage radio and other vintage electronics etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
22nd Jan 2023, 7:59 pm | #41 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,902
|
Re: Hum in homebuilt valve amp
A copper band forming a shorted turn around the whole transformer does indeed act to confine flux to the transformer core. It's usually shaped to conform to the shape of the outside of the bobbin and its windings. This is why it's done.
They also work at excluding external fields. So in this case, one could have been applied to the mains transformer, and a second one could have been added to the output transformer as well. This is what I'd have suggested IF raising the transformers a little and insulating one end of every mounting bolt hadn't worked. The copper bands would have acted against mag field crossing the fresh air between the transformers, but not acted against the mounting bolt linkage via chassis currents. The mounting bolts being genuine turns added to the transformer and intercepting about 50% of the legitimate core flux. But with the no-valve hum now negligible, the job's done. Copper bands would have been an alternative to the steel shield. These sorts of jobs can often be done in more than one way. Davd
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
22nd Jan 2023, 8:09 pm | #42 |
Octode
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Blackburn with Darwen, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 1,573
|
Re: Hum in homebuilt valve amp
OK thank you for the answer.
Adrian |
26th Jan 2023, 3:59 pm | #43 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Croydon, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 7,580
|
Re: Hum in homebuilt valve amp
Just to show what the 'big boys' do (in this case Orange), I have been safety-testing a 200 watt bass amplifier (4 x KT88) and one thing I have to do is check the transformer construction. Here, I'm just removing the shrouds and you notice that the through-bolts have plastic collars fitted. They haven't fitted insulators to the chassis....the transformers are bolted directly to the chassis so in this case just the insulating washers are enough to reduce hum (which is barely noticeable).
__________________
There are lots of brilliant keyboard players and then there is Rick Wakeman..... |
26th Jan 2023, 4:45 pm | #44 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,902
|
Re: Hum in homebuilt valve amp
The Orange valve amps were originally badged versions of Matamps. Matt was a thoroughly competent engineer and one of the good guys (and a regular customer of dad's).
David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
26th Jan 2023, 5:51 pm | #45 |
Pentode
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Coventry, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 210
|
Re: Hum in homebuilt valve amp
I've always assumed the through-bolt head insulation washers were to stop the bolts forming a shorted turn, on a transformer I have to hand, one bolt has a steel washer for earth continuity.
|
26th Jan 2023, 8:31 pm | #46 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,902
|
Re: Hum in homebuilt valve amp
Yes, a single one doing some earthing is a good idea.
Some HP instruments had transformers mounted to the rear panel with an end bell on the outside. The shorted turn issue had been found some time in the past and plastic bushes on the end of the screws going through the panel and bell were fitted. The folk on the line just fitted them without wondering why. It was discovered that the bells and the screw heads didn't pass earth bonding tests when such tests came along with new safety standards. Some instruments had 2-pack paint on the rear panel while the steel bells had a varnish on them. Even deleting the plastic bushes didn't create reliable earthing. I got pulled into the matter, worked out why the bushes were there, and found that in most cases, the paint and/or varnish provided insulation, but not reliably. So the bushes, well at least three of them had to stay because of circulating current issues, but one screw with plain stainless washers still didn't give reliable earthing. I ended up getting our own bells pressed out of aluminium and alochrome treated. I changed the rear panels to silk screen black text on bare alochrome. So the aluminium bell was directly onto the aluminium panel, just with our standard, conductive, alochrome finish on both surfaces. Saved the cost of painting the panel and made our family of instruments look more uniform. Transformer core earthing still wasn't certain because of varnish on the lams from vacuum impregnation. Bushes were still a good idea but could be done on the inside end of the mounting bolts. The transformers had mummy-wrapped primaries and an electrostatic screen, but most importantly they were on the inside and fully covered so didn't have to be earth bonding tested. The aluminium bells passed just fine. We did leave one bolt without a bush, but that was usually not too important. Earthing transformer laminations is a difficult thing. They do their work by breaking up circulating current paths transverse to the magnetic flux paths. They work by having insulating coatings on them, well, not very conductive surface treatments. So you can't rely on all the lams of a core being connected together. Electrically, there is no singular item as 'A core'. A crinkle washer went on the bolt sans bush. That theoretically earthed the lam on the inward face of the core. The lam on the outwards face of the core was pressed against the earthed, aluminium rear panel. So to fix circulating current issues AND have all externally accessible parts meet an earth bond test requirement, the solution needing to be found is highly dependent on the arrangement of the transformer and how it's supported. No one solution can fit all the possibilities, but bits of solutions can be used... with care. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
27th Jan 2023, 1:43 am | #47 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,088
|
Re: Hum in homebuilt valve amp
That's a fascinating post, David - thanks!
|
1st Feb 2023, 2:50 pm | #48 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,088
|
Re: Hum in homebuilt valve amp
Quote:
Unsuspected signals like this could easily 'use up' some of the internal signal headroom and lead to overloading of intermediate stages, even when you think they shouldn't be. It emphasizes your point (and Radio Wrangler's point in the Quad II thread) to get the amplifier free from problems before adding feedback. |
|
1st Feb 2023, 5:08 pm | #49 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kilmarnock, Ayrshire, UK.
Posts: 5,422
|
Re: Hum in homebuilt valve amp
Hi.
I had the very same issue with my Mullard 3-3 stereo amp build. Slight hum with the Rectifier valve removed but when inserted absolutely no hum at all. I later substituted the mains transformer for a one with higher heater current of a different format with full screening only to cure the issue. I had already deduced it was magnetic leakage but when warmed I thought wrongly it may have been cancellation between the induced hum and out of phase hum from the HT, so it seems I was wrong.
__________________
Cheers, Trevor. MM0KJJ. RSGB, GQRP, WACRAL, K&LARC. Member |