|
Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets. |
|
Thread Tools |
11th Aug 2018, 2:03 pm | #21 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,803
|
Re: Valve construction.
Quote:
David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
|
11th Aug 2018, 2:25 pm | #22 |
Nonode
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aberdeen, UK.
Posts: 2,839
|
Re: Valve construction.
GJ has raised a good point in mentioning clouds of electrons at the cathode, and a similar "cloud" at the anode. The cathode cloud's electrons soon mostly whizzes of to the anode when HT reaches full potential, but the anode cloud of electrons was seen as a problem as triodes, then SG(screen grid)valves, were developed in the 1920's. Hence a pentode's Grid3. G3, being connected to & at cathode(more or less -ve) potential, persuades the -ve electrons from being attracted to the screen's +ve potential, or in fact those random electrons encouraging grid current under certain biasing & signal conditions.
Back to mentioning the orientation of anodes & cathodes - have a look through The Valve Museum site. P1's, HL610's, LS2's & 3's :- very early valves, some with "Hat" type anodes, or horizontal anodes, not vertical tubular shapes. Researching those post WW1 & 1920's valves, is a good way of understanding the modern-ish valves we now take for granted in vintage pursuits. By the way, those with AVO VCM's will often notice the slow dispersal of the cathode "cloud", after completion of testing. Reveals itself under C/H INS. Regards, David |
11th Aug 2018, 9:01 pm | #23 | |||
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: Valve construction.
Quote:
I guess the same formula could be used for a pentode's µg1-g2 (obviously with the g2-k distance substituted for your a-k) Quote:
Quote:
It is the anode voltage accelerating the electrons which speeds them up - 250V on the anode means that each electron hitting it has 250eV of energy. And that's why the anode of the EL84 in your radio gets hotter than the anodes of the EZ80, even though the EZ80 carries more current than the EL84! |
|||
11th Aug 2018, 10:33 pm | #24 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,803
|
Re: Valve construction.
You still have to pour a lot of heater watts into the EZ80 to be able to emit the required rate of electrons/second to make up the set's total HT current
David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
11th Aug 2018, 10:43 pm | #25 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: Valve construction.
You certainly do. Though, the EZ80's heater draws 600mA whereas the EL84 guzzles 760mA!
I'm thinking that the EZ80's anode (which does not get anything like so hot as the EL84's) may be bright internally, thus reflecting radiated heat back to the cathode, so it will need less power to keep it up to temperature. But the EL84 has an anode that dissipates 12W, so it has to be much bigger, plus it's farther away to make room for all those grids (which have to be kept coolish else they might start emitting themselves), so the EL84 cathode loses heat quite readily and thus needs more heater power. |
12th Aug 2018, 10:39 am | #26 |
Nonode
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aberdeen, UK.
Posts: 2,839
|
Re: Valve construction.
Right enough, as kalee20 says in post 23, as well as the bog-standard orientation in most circuit diagrams, from the early days onwards there have been a number of different & sometimes weird representations of valves.
I take my hat off to Andy for spending time opening up valves & examining their electrodes. Something I've never done intentionally. Just when a valve has been accidentally damaged. Many valves which pass through the hands of vintage radio collectors are often well silvered & often grubby, so examination is limited. I was lucky, even privileged, last year in being allowed to test & catalogue a BVWS chum's valuable collection of rare early valves, many NOS & still in their boxes. The glass envelope being clear & unblemished enabled me to see primitive electrode structures, which up till then I could only study on valve museum sites. It just goes to show that, electronics wise, the learning curve still continues after 3 score years & ten. Even more wonder & enjoyment was experienced with these old valves when discovering inside some boxes - original graphs of expected Ia/Vg(gm) curves. Then - lo & behold, many of these valves were able to just about replicate their tabulated spec on a valve tester ! Regards, David |
12th Aug 2018, 11:14 am | #27 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Leominster, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 16,528
|
Re: Valve construction.
Maybe the EZ80's anodes being closer to its cathode helps, too.
__________________
....__________ ....|____||__|__\_____ .=.| _---\__|__|_---_|. .........O..Chris....O |
13th Aug 2018, 3:43 pm | #28 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: Valve construction.
The EZ80 anode being closer to the cathode means that a given anode current flow requires a smaller anode voltage, so less voltage drop in the PSU and less heat at the anode.
It could be (I am not sure) that an EZ80 needs less heater power because it has a slightly smaller cathode surface area. Or it could be that there is less concern about maintaining a full healthy cathode space charge throughout the AC cycle. In an output valve a weak cathode space charge might mean some rounding of signal peaks; in a rectifier the same phenomenon could produce a useful reduction in peak current. Sadly, the people who might know have probably gone. |
13th Aug 2018, 6:21 pm | #29 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,803
|
Re: Valve construction.
The little EZ80's cathode is having to emit every bit of current which passes through all the other valves in a set. And it runs on less than the sum of all their heater powers. And it's expected to run these currents with lower anode-cathode volts.
Oh, yeah, and it has to do it in narrower pulses than half a cycle, due to peak charging and the size of the reservoir. Bit of an unsung hero. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
15th Aug 2018, 12:42 pm | #30 | ||
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: Valve construction.
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
15th Aug 2018, 2:27 pm | #31 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: Valve construction.
Yes, ion bombardment is not good.
The effect on anode heat might be less than expected, though. Basically you have a choice between a current peak (so boosting I) or a voltage peak (boosting V) - either will boost anode heat IV. I was speculating, so quite likely to be wrong! |
22nd Aug 2018, 11:19 pm | #32 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,310
|
Re: Valve construction.
By coincidence I've had a surprising 'valve construction' experience today.
I have a preamplifier in for service which has been modified at least twice by other people in the past. I don't have a circuit for this model and even if I did I couldn't be sure about any subsequent mods. As part of the mystery there doesn't seem even to be a definitive published valve line-up. All five of the valves were clearly B9A double triodes and having traced the circuit it was clear they all had the ECC81/2/3 pin connections. Since this was a stereo pre I could at least be certain that corresponding valves in opposite channels were the same. On this basis it seemed that in fact they were all ECC83s. The first two pictures show the two valves from the phono stage, one from the left channel and one from the right. One is clearly marked ECC83 and although the other has had the end of its label wiped off it looks exactly the same as the first. The anodes are identical, as are the micas. All of the connections between the pins and the electrodes follow exactly the same paths. The getter rings match perfectly. Even the remaining printing on the second valve looks very much like the printing on the first. Imagine my surprise then when I came to check the type codes. One of them is I6 which is perhaps the most common of the ECC83 codes. But as you can see from the third picture the other is Gf. So it's not an ECC83 at all. It's an ECC82. These valves are not similar. The '83 has a mu of 100, and with 250V a-k and just -2V on the grid the valve passes 1.2mA. The '82 has a mu of 17 and with the same Va-k the grid voltage can be taken all the way to -8.5V and the valve will still be passing 10.5mA. I was so surprised I actually put the valves into my AVO CT-160. Sure enough the '83 tested just like an '83 and the '82 like an '82. To look at they are the absolute spitting image of one another. Peas in a pod. But they're very different valves. The last picture (which is a blow-up of part of the second one) shows what seems to be the only visible difference. If you look into the anodes through the small circular holes about half way up the picture and close to its left and right edges, you can just make out the grid wire wrapped around the silver-coloured grid rod. In the valve on the left (the '82) the wire is thick and coarsely spaced. In the '83, on the right, it is thin and finely spaced. The grid-cathode gap might be different too, but it's essentially impossible to see the cathode so I can't tell. This is how the valves were when the pre arrived here. The owner likes the sound. I wonder if it'll sound different to him when I've replaced the '82 in one channel with an '83 to match the other one ? Cheers, GJ
__________________
http://www.ampregen.com |
23rd Aug 2018, 7:18 am | #33 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sleaford, Lincs. UK.
Posts: 7,639
|
Re: Valve construction.
Interesting GJ, this is why I started the thread. As you say you can clearly see the grid difference on your pic 3. I'd bet the cathodes are identical, at least from a first glance, but the ECC82's must be beefier, it has to "pass" more current, 10 times more.
I'm still ploughing through some the suggested reading so havn't commented for a while but am still reading the posts. Andy.
__________________
Curiosity hasn't killed this cat...so far. |
23rd Aug 2018, 8:24 am | #34 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,310
|
Re: Valve construction.
I don't know what it is that limits the current in the ECC83 (the datasheet says it shouldn't be taken above 8mA, or the anode dissipation above 1W, whereas the '82 is rated for use up to 20mA and 2.75W). I might have guessed that in the '83 they were aiming to keep the grid temperature down, perhaps because the wire is so fine and so close to the cathode (if it is). But they haven't gone to the trouble of using copper grid rods for better conduction nor have they welded radiating fins onto the top of the grid rods, as you sometimes see in other valves.
Cheers, GJ
__________________
http://www.ampregen.com |
23rd Aug 2018, 8:51 am | #35 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: Valve construction.
ECC82 and 83... yes I've been able to tell an unmarked one by the grid, but only if I have a pair of known ones to compare against (and that's ignoring the possibility the unmarked one is an '81).
It's a good point about anode dissipation, why can the '82 tolerate nearly 3 times as much heat at its anode when they have apparently the same size and shape? Can Synchrodyne help? |
23rd Aug 2018, 8:59 am | #36 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,310
|
Re: Valve construction.
I haven't thought about what really controls the grid temperature. There are both heat inputs (electron impact heating and radiation from the cathode and the anode) and heat outputs (conduction down the grid rods to the connectors and thence to the pins and radiation back to the other electrodes) to consider. Maybe the anode temperature has to be kept low not to protect the anode itself but to help manage the grid temperature ?
Cheers, GJ
__________________
http://www.ampregen.com |
23rd Aug 2018, 9:27 am | #37 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: Valve construction.
Keeping grid temperature down is important to minimise grid emission. If a valve is intended to be operable with super-high values of permitted Rgk, then it could be inferred that grid current has been thought about and carefully minimised. But Rgk is the same for both valves, indicating that grid currents are similar.
I'd expect most of the temperature rise of the grid to be due to the cathode anyway. In the high-mu ECC83 the grid is closer to the cathode and the anode is relatively distant (as per G8HQP Dave's post #10), on that basis you'd rather think the '83 could cope with MORE anode dissipation than the '82, not less! |
23rd Aug 2018, 9:41 am | #38 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 4,385
|
Re: Valve construction.
I wonder if the observed very fine grid wires associated with the ECC83 would be more prone to microphony when thermally expanded/changed in temper than the relatively thick ECC82 wires? Also perhaps given the application implication that the ECC83 will be used in circuits offering higher gain and with lower-level signals.
|
23rd Aug 2018, 10:28 am | #39 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,310
|
Re: Valve construction.
Quote:
Cheers, GJ
__________________
http://www.ampregen.com |
|
23rd Aug 2018, 1:07 pm | #40 | |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Hykeham, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 515
|
Re: Valve construction.
Quote:
Ignore the second row of etched characters - these indicate factory and date of manufacture and will obviously vary from valve to valve. |
|