|
Vintage Television and Video Vintage television and video equipment, programmes, VCRs etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
10th Jan 2022, 4:29 pm | #1 |
Pentode
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wombourne, South Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 225
|
BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
Some rather wordy advice for viewers in the Radio Times, on how to correctly adjust their 5:4 sets to the new 4:3 standard. Advice, I feel, that would not be followed for long.
__________________
G8KBG - BVWS Member - BATC Member |
10th Jan 2022, 5:43 pm | #2 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 18,723
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
An I not right in thinking that rectangular 5:4 CRTs were being made well into the 1960s and the advice in Thorn service manuals was to set the height normally, and overscan the width so the test card "C"side castellations were off the screen?
What with the effects of changing mains voltage and general poor HT and EHT regulation on a typical domestic set, perhaps the BBC should have not even bothered to tell the public about the change. It's a bit like when Radio 4 LW dropped by 2kHz, did anyone notice?
__________________
-- Graham. G3ZVT Last edited by Graham G3ZVT; 10th Jan 2022 at 5:51 pm. |
10th Jan 2022, 6:26 pm | #3 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
Same problem today fitting 16:9 into 5:4 or 4:3. My preferred option is to lose picture content at the sides instead of compressing the height.
Peter |
10th Jan 2022, 7:13 pm | #4 |
Octode
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Stevenage, Herts. UK.
Posts: 1,518
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
I wonder why EMI picked 5:4 when 4:3 was already established as the cinema standard?
|
10th Jan 2022, 7:54 pm | #5 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,087
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
Possibly because, with a circular CRT screen, masked-off, that gives a rectangle of slightly greater area?
The maximum area would be a square of course, but that's not so visually appealing, so 5:4 was the compromise. (Actually, I thought TV aspect ratios were quoted as height:width traditionally, and cinema width:height) |
10th Jan 2022, 8:11 pm | #6 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Cumbria (CA13), UK
Posts: 6,130
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
I can't say that I've ever seen TV aspect ratios quoted as height:width, i.e. 3:4 or 4:5 (and certainly not 9:16).
__________________
Mending is better than Ending (cf Brave New World by Aldous Huxley) |
10th Jan 2022, 8:30 pm | #7 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 14,005
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
I wonder how many of the BBC's customers would have noticed the change?
And if they did they'd probably complain that "The damned gasometer down in Railway Cuttings is messing with the picture again", fiddle around with the vertical/horizontal hold controls and then go back to watching whatever interminably-worthy 'drama' was being broadcast that night.
__________________
I'm the Operator of my Pocket Calculator. -Kraftwerk. |
10th Jan 2022, 8:31 pm | #8 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
I remember the CRT's that had a width to height ratio of 5/4, to get a circle on the test card the height was set as per normal and the width was set to over scan.
Lawrence. |
10th Jan 2022, 10:31 pm | #9 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 18,723
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
Quote:
I am sure I have seen film footage of the person concerned reminiscing on how he felt unqualified to make the decision.
__________________
-- Graham. G3ZVT |
|
10th Jan 2022, 10:46 pm | #10 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 18,723
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
Quote:
16:9 = 1.77:1 4:3 = 1.33:1 I have a piece of software that used that convention (1.77 vs 1.78 is just a rounding issue apparently) Then again sometimes they are expressed as ninths, 16:9 (obviously) and 12:9 (4:3)
__________________
-- Graham. G3ZVT |
|
11th Jan 2022, 9:49 am | #11 |
Heptode
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West London, UK.
Posts: 867
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
Now we have two suffer another aspect ratio change with programmes made for TV like Dr Who or Around the world in 80 days being in the new format of Univisium a compromise between cinemas wide screen and TV wide screen
https://www.reddit.com/r/Filmmakers/...ing_over_film/ John |
11th Jan 2022, 10:53 am | #12 |
Octode
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Co. Durham, UK.
Posts: 1,117
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
The Baird system aspect ratio is often misquoted as 7:3, rather than 3:7.
Curiously, if you take into consideration the graduated scanning, the actual picture ratio is very nearly 1:2. |
11th Jan 2022, 11:05 am | #13 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kington, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 3,675
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
This clip appeared on All Our Yesterdays - it would have been about 1971, given that the programme dealt with the events of twenty five years previously. If I remember right, this was the man appointed to be Controller of Television Service after the war. - Maurice Gorham, I think. He said almost the first piece of paper on his desk was to decide whether the aspect ratio should be 5:4 or 4:3. He frankly admitted he had no idea what this was about.
Last edited by Ted Kendall; 11th Jan 2022 at 11:21 am. |
11th Jan 2022, 11:18 am | #14 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 8,832
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
Because CRTs are (were) circular, thus enabling maximum usage of the CRT screen.
__________________
A digital radio is the latest thing, but a vintage wireless is forever.. |
11th Jan 2022, 11:36 am | #15 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Posts: 7,444
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
After changing the aspect ratio from 5:4 to 4:3 in order to maintain the same number of picture elements per line, the bandwidth of the video was increased from 2.7Mhz to closer 3Mhz.
The active video part of a line was in those days about 81 to 82 microseconds. DFWB. |
11th Jan 2022, 11:37 am | #16 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Warnham, West Sussex. 10 miles south of DORKING.
Posts: 9,147
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
My thoughts are that it was a bad move at the time. The change definitely reduced the size of the viewing area especially regarding the small tubes that were in use back then.
I suppose it was inevitable and a later change would probably have caused problems when picture tubes became larger. It was easier to change when viewing numbers were small. The pictures show the differences showing between 5.4 and 4.3. PYE LV30 [1950], PYE D/B16T [1946] and Philips 683U [1949] Bush TV12 1949 and Bush TV22 [1950] I believe replacement masks were available for some models but who would have bothered? John |
11th Jan 2022, 12:21 pm | #17 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Posts: 7,444
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
It's most likely the BBC was aware that the next generation of CRTs will have rectangular 4:3 aspect ratio faceplates.
The early 110degree CRTs introduced in 1958 did indeed have 5:4 screens. DFWB. |
11th Jan 2022, 1:31 pm | #18 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
I must say I don't like the American approach to round CRTs of vignetting the corners.
Peter |
11th Jan 2022, 1:46 pm | #19 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,433
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
You also may not like this 1951 Zenith, 165 sq in CRT, approx 14inch diameter.
__________________
Frank |
11th Jan 2022, 1:49 pm | #20 |
Triode
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire, UK.
Posts: 32
|
Re: BBC Aspect Ratio Change 1950
It's surprising the variation in sensitivity to aspect ratio accuracy.
I'm fairly sensitive, cannot bear the regular inaccuracies. Many people would watch a 16:9 squashed onto 4:3 and visa versa without either noticing or being bothered. A colleague (while doing QC) visually picked up a sub 1% line length inaccuracy due to a codec misconfiguration. Other staff had not noticed this for months. And how do our eyes and brains compensate for off-axis viewing?
__________________
John |