|
Vintage Television and Video Vintage television and video equipment, programmes, VCRs etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
25th Jul 2019, 9:45 am | #61 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Who designed these sets, was it Bush?
Peter |
25th Jul 2019, 10:39 am | #62 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Posts: 7,444
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Nothing to do with Bush Radio although some design elements of the T5 were incorporated in the Theatreland models. Most notable is the frame scanning system which employ extended pole pieces from the oscillator transformer.
There is evidence that the first Ambassador TVs used some of the technology from the Theatreland Baird sets. Wasn't the post-war Baird TV manufacturing financed by J.L.Baird's friend Jack Buchanan? http://www.bairdtelevision.com/Buchanan.html DFWB. |
25th Jul 2019, 11:41 am | #63 |
Nonode
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 2,533
|
Re: Baird Garrick
|
25th Jul 2019, 1:44 pm | #64 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ware, Hertfordshire, UK.
Posts: 988
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Hi Peter,
well as Fernseh points out obviously not Bush, but then again Bush must get some credit as most of the design is lifted from the pre-war Baird T18. The timebase has seen the simple change from B5 Cossor 41MP output triodes to Mazda octal PEN46 pentodes which are triode connected. Similar changes are found elsewhere in the set, but the design is really the television part of a T18 with updated valves. The only new parts of the design are the RF stages. Anyway, I have no clue as to who updated the design and re-designed the sound and vision RF stages. I've included a picture of the scanning yoke from the T18 so you can compare it with the photo in my last post. I should measure the coil resistance values and check them against the T18 manual. Cheers Andy
__________________
www.youtube.com/user/andyvalve100 |
25th Jul 2019, 3:09 pm | #65 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Quote:
Yes, thumbing through Baird's biography co-authored by Malcolm Baird it looks as if in July 1944 Baird wrote to Buchanan with a view to setting up "John Logie Baird Ltd" along with his lawyer Shelley for the manufacture of television receivers and also cinema television. In terms of receivers, their first was the giant Grosvenor of which only one was ever made and it appeared in early 1946. It looks as if the 27" CRT was an in house product but Plessey provided the television chassis, radiogram and cabinet. After Baird's death and under Buchanan's chairmanship the theatreland models were apparently built at a factory in Rayner's Lane, Harrow and the Grosvenor was intended to be the top of the line model. Peter |
|
25th Jul 2019, 3:52 pm | #66 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Posts: 7,444
|
Re: Baird Garrick
A similar frame timebase circuit was used in the Ambassador TV2. See post #14. It would be interesting to find out which company designed the frame timebase. The original Baird company had links with Fernseh AG.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernseh DFWB. |
25th Jul 2019, 4:14 pm | #67 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
I see a reference to a Baird Patented vertical deflection here:
https://www.earlytelevision.org/fernseh.html I've emailed Darius asking if he knows the patent number. Peter |
26th Jul 2019, 10:05 am | #68 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
I've had a look through a stack (180) of Baird patents but I can't find it and unfortunately Darius can't locate it either.
In the biography there is a reference to "Baird's former assistant Anderson, who had continued with the company as technical partner, was asked to develop a table-top television set for the American standards." The name EDWARD GEORGE ORME ANDERSON does appear in some of the Baird patents so he may have been the circuit designer of the "vertical deflection" circuit. Peter |
26th Jul 2019, 10:31 am | #69 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Posts: 7,444
|
Re: Baird Garrick
From google patents, an amplifier attributed to Edward George Orme Anderson.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US2537807 Patent filed 1951 as a phase splitting amplifier. But this amplifier which employed the Mullard TSE4 secondary emission valve was used in this application in 1938 in the Baird T20 and T23 TV receivers. DFWB. |
26th Jul 2019, 12:52 pm | #70 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
There are lots of Baird patents from the mechanical era and I didn't inspect many from the early 1930s but I think I looked at most of the mid 30s onwards. I did come across the video amp one but nothing that looked like a vertical deflection circuit. I am skeptical about JLB being a circuit designer. I was just clutching at straws with Anderson in my ignorance of any other obvious name. I did try looking at Geoffrey George Bernard, A. G. D. West, Paul Vernon Reveley, Alfred Sommer apart from JLB himself without success.
Peter Last edited by peter_scott; 26th Jul 2019 at 1:10 pm. |
26th Jul 2019, 1:16 pm | #71 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
I wonder if it might be Rudolf Jan Hamilton Forman?
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publ...=&locale=en_EP Peter |
26th Jul 2019, 1:31 pm | #72 | |
Heptode
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ware, Hertfordshire, UK.
Posts: 988
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Quote:
you might be on to something. However this patent is about line deflection. Note that it mentions 6kHz which is 25Hz x 240 lines. It could well be the same person who designed the frame deflection as well though. Cheers Andy
__________________
www.youtube.com/user/andyvalve100 |
|
26th Jul 2019, 1:35 pm | #73 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Hi Andy,
There is some similarity. Peter |
26th Jul 2019, 2:53 pm | #74 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Also:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publ...FT=D&DB=EPODOC https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publ...FT=D&DB=EPODOC https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publ...FT=D&DB=EPODOC https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publ...C&locale=en_EP Last edited by peter_scott; 26th Jul 2019 at 3:00 pm. |
26th Jul 2019, 5:17 pm | #75 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Posts: 7,444
|
Re: Baird Garrick
|
28th Jul 2019, 11:03 am | #76 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
I think this is the patent that describes the combined frame oscillator transformer and scan coil.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publ...C&locale=en_EP There are also some further patents from George Richard Tingley relating to the front scanned CRT used in the 27" Grosvenor and the 11" front scanned projection tubes. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publ...C&locale=en_EP Peter |
29th Jul 2019, 2:00 am | #77 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Posts: 7,444
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Hi Peter,
That looks like the frame scanning patent we're looking for although the text doesn't mention anything about the pole extension pole pieces. The text does mention extra the winding on the transformer used to counter the standing valve anode current. Without this winding the picture will be deflected off the screen. The Murphy V136 of 1948 employed a self oscillating frame timebase. In this receiver the frame oscillator transformer is also the scanning yoke. That projection CRT used in the Grosvenor set is an interesting device. Some provision for keystone correction of the raster will be necessary. DFWB. |
29th Jul 2019, 8:44 am | #78 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Hi David,
Perhaps Tingley thought it unnecessary to show the pole piece configuration because anyone using the GB463972 description would be forced to use extended pole pieces anyway. The other Tingley patents I mentioned do show extended poles in their figures. As I understand it there were two televisions showing the 1946 victory parade in the Savoy. One had a 5' projection display that magnified the image from an 11" front scanned CRT and the other was the "Grosvenor" which had a 27¾" front scanned CRT viewed directly. I think there was talk of using the "Grosvenor" CRT for larger projections but that probably got overtaken by the "Teapot" projection CRTs. Peter Last edited by peter_scott; 29th Jul 2019 at 8:54 am. |
29th Jul 2019, 7:56 pm | #79 | |
Heptode
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ware, Hertfordshire, UK.
Posts: 988
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Quote:
Peter, How do you find all this stuff? Cheers Andy
__________________
www.youtube.com/user/andyvalve100 |
|
29th Jul 2019, 8:20 pm | #80 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Baird Garrick
Hi Andy,
Nothing clever I'm afraid. Just searching in Espacenet for any likely inventor names and sometimes one leads to another. "John Logie Baird: A Life" also gave a few starting points. Thanks for the page 5. I missed that. Peter Last edited by peter_scott; 29th Jul 2019 at 8:28 pm. |