|
Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets. |
|
Thread Tools |
3rd Oct 2018, 10:43 am | #1 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
I am about to try and increase the Q of my home brew BPF for RX on
2200 meters. Are polypropylene capacitors good for this application? I have been using film caps and wire ended miniature chokes, (the ones that look like 1/4W resistors)so I have ordered some #26 mix cores in 1.3" OD hoping I can get enough turns on them. I have the required caps in polyester film but am wondering if polypropylene are both different and better. I need to achieve circa 616nF so have been using 47nF and 560nF in parallel. As physical size doesn't really matter I was also wondering if part of the paralleling could practically be done with multi gang air spaced variable caps so I can trim the thing a useful amount to centre it where I want it. The schematic is at http://www.chriswilson.tv/filter.jpg I am aiming at a pass band that is as tight on 135 to 139kHz as possible. Thanks.
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
3rd Oct 2018, 10:48 am | #2 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
Almost any capacitor will have higher Q than almost any inductor. Miniature chokes usually have quite low Q. As a general rule, the bigger the inductor the higher the Q - assuming that physical size remains well below wavelength.
|
3rd Oct 2018, 11:21 am | #3 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
OK, thanks a lot Dave, so these cores should be a big improvement on the leaded inductors hopefully?
http://micrometalsarnoldpowdercores....-DataSheet.pdf
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
3rd Oct 2018, 11:57 am | #4 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,082
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
Iron powder toroidal cores are good, but not massively low-loss. They make excellent chokes.
Chokes exist to put inductive impedance in a circuit. Usually, losses are not important as long as they don't make it get too hot! Sometimes, losses are actually a bonus, as they can stop unwanted resonances (which is the opposite of what you want). Personally, I'd look at a ferrite core, something like a gapped RM10 size. Almost all the losses will be in the winding resistance; with iron-powder, there will be core losses. The design is not trivial, because skin effect and proximity effect will kick in. Yes, polypropylene capacitors are good - about 10 times better than polyester (look for the tan-delta in the spec). Though as Dave says, the losses in the inductor are likely to dominate. |
3rd Oct 2018, 12:08 pm | #5 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
Thanks again for another reply, are you able to recommend a specific core material?
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
3rd Oct 2018, 4:15 pm | #6 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,082
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
I've just looked at the schematic - and assimilated the capacitor value.
Wow. I'd read 616pF - you are actually 616nF, so looking for only 2.2uH. That's low! At 137kHz, you have a reactance of 1.89 ohms. So if you want a circuit Q of 100, then R must be 0.0189 milliohms. That's a challenge! With a core having a fairly low Al of 160nH, you would still need just 4 turns (this will give 2.56uH). Advantage is that you can keep the turns well apart, minimising self-capacitance (which tends to be lossy capacitance). But you'll need to use thick wire. What material? Well, 137kHz is right in the middle of typical SMPS frequencies, so anything optimised for that would be good (Q is not an issue, but temperature rise is - and they both correlate directly to a low-loss material). So Ferroxcube 3C90, 3C92, 3C94, 3F3, 3F4 would all be applicable. Last edited by kalee20; 3rd Oct 2018 at 4:15 pm. Reason: Typo |
3rd Oct 2018, 4:23 pm | #7 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
Please bear in mind that temperature rise is no issue, this BPF is solely for reception purposes!
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
3rd Oct 2018, 4:34 pm | #8 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bewdley, Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 4,748
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
There was an old rule of thumb which suggested 1.5pF per metre of wavelength. This equates to 3,300pF with a consequent increase in inductor value and L/C ratio.
__________________
Phil Optimist [n]: One who is not in possession of the full facts |
4th Oct 2018, 11:48 am | #9 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
You might be better running the filter at a higher impedance, and then matching to 50 ohms. Tuned circuit reactances in the region of 100-200 ohms (i.e. 1.3-2.6pF/m - so the same region as Phil suggests) may be easier to make at reasonable Q.
|
4th Oct 2018, 12:00 pm | #10 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
Some great advice, thanks! Would there be any mileage in looking at a resonant filter or are they not tight enough?
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |
5th Oct 2018, 12:15 pm | #11 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
Not sure what you mean by a 'resonant filter'. Your filter already uses resonance, but requires an inductor which is difficult to make with sufficiently high Q.
135 to 139kHz passband would need a loaded Q of 34 for a single resonator, assuming -3dB edges. Perhaps loaded Q around 50 for a critically coupled pair? That means an unloaded Q around 200-300 for lowish loss, which should be achievable - or maybe loss is not a problem? |
5th Oct 2018, 1:35 pm | #12 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bewdley, Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 4,748
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
Would an active preselector like this http://http://www.alg.myzen.co.uk/radio/136/pre_sel.htm possibly be easier to build?
__________________
Phil Optimist [n]: One who is not in possession of the full facts |
5th Oct 2018, 2:07 pm | #13 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
Throwing a random idea on the table... can you use a low noise high slew opamp for this and lose the inductors in favour of capacitors in a gyrator arrangement? Solves a lot of problems. May create different ones.
http://sound.whsites.net/articles/gyrator-filters.htm I've built a couple which are very sharp bandpass filters around the 100khz mark based on the above. |
5th Oct 2018, 8:44 pm | #14 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,998
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
1.5pF per metre of wavelength stirs some ad-hoc memories too.
There are similar ad-hoc length:diameter 'rules' for winding coils to achieve the highest Q (basically getting the most inductance for the shortest length of wire). Depends on whether you're using a single winding or overlapped windings (overlapped windings add self-capacitance which complicates the resonance calculations). Given that it's for reception only, have you thought of wrapping a "Q-multiplier" around your coil/capacitor, just as we did with elderly radios using 465KHz transformer-coupled IF-stages back in the 1960s to narrow the bandwidth for better SSB/CW reception? |
5th Oct 2018, 11:17 pm | #15 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,082
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
Quote:
Completely different end result, but which puts similar requirements on the ferrite. |
|
6th Oct 2018, 8:00 am | #16 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sleaford, Lincs. UK.
Posts: 7,662
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
As Mr Bungle says, an active filter using op amp's would be easier probably especially as there is a really good filter design tool available on the Texas site.
Andy.
__________________
Curiosity hasn't killed this cat...so far. |
6th Oct 2018, 11:39 am | #17 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
and smaller!
|
8th Oct 2018, 2:58 pm | #18 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
A really smart idea and pretty much guaranteed to give far better results than with LC experimentation! Nice one!
__________________
Al |
11th Oct 2018, 12:39 pm | #19 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Whitchurch, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: Increasing the Q of a home made band pass filter for LF
Some excellent help and advice here thank you all very much indeed. I have made a good improvement by using proper toroids, home wound instead of the little mini chokes and by using polypropylene capacitors. When i am feeling more adventurous I may look at an active filter too. Thanks again
__________________
Best Regards, CW. 2E0ILY |