![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Success Stories If you have successfully repaired or restored a piece of equipment, why not write up what you did and post details here. Particularly if it was interesting, unusual or challenging. PLEASE DO NOT POST REQUESTS FOR HELP HERE! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Isle of Wight, UK.
Posts: 819
|
Just thought I would share this.
I have the above which despite thorough cleaning of all turret band selector contacts FM was still very poor. On max volume and aerial fully extended it was only just audible on the strong stations. Pulled a few caps around IF cans, and tested and to my surprise C5, C19, C27, C32 and C53 were testing at between 1n to 7n when they should be either 51p or 24p. Fitted replacements and it is excellent now, very loud and clear on all FM stations even without the aerial extended. If you have one of these sets, it is easy to repair and very worthwhile. Photo of offenders. Cheers Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Octode
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bath, Somerset, UK.
Posts: 1,972
|
Thanks for posting this Rob. I have had two of these sets recently and neither of them worked on FM which is a known weak spot on these radios. There are a few electrolytics in there too which also affect FM performance. Nice sets all the same.
Neil
__________________
preserving the recent past, for the distant future. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 30,590
|
Indeed, thanks for this. The 21x series does have a general reputation for disappointing FM performance, so I wonder if this is the explanation. My 215 is perfectly usable on FM, but it's certainly nothing special, unlike the AM performance which is outstanding for a single conversion design.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Heptode
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ryde, Isle of Wight, UK.
Posts: 617
|
Robsradio, many thanks for that info, I have one up in the loft, waiting for that fault to be sorted. Also needs a set of vol and tone knobs, not much hope there
![]() Ken G6HZG.
__________________
Life is not Hollywood, life is Cricklewood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Pentode
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Devon, UK.
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
The AM performance was indeed impressive. Was there an RF amp before the local osc/mixer stage? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Nonode
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bristol, UK.
Posts: 2,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 30,590
|
There is an AM RF stage before the mixer, unusual in a domestic transistor radio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Nonode
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bristol, UK.
Posts: 2,311
|
You may be right - "Tuning Indicator"? What tuning indicator? Another bad Friday afternoon in Minsk? Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 30,590
|
I don't think this was a quality control issue. At one stage they deleted the tuning/voltage meter but didn't bother changing the printing. As I've said in other threads, these sets are a strange mixture of overengineering and shoddy materials. Maybe everything in the USSR was made like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Isle of Wight, UK.
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
Hope you get a chance to look at it, but if not, i’d give it a new home if you ever decide to release it, i’m in Newport ;-) Cheers Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Isle of Wight, UK.
Posts: 819
|
Ive uncovered a couple more sets, one very deaf on FM, the other had nothing on FM.
Did the above capacitor swap outs and both are now excellent on FM even with the aerial retracted. So if anyone is considering trying it, 3 out of 3 successes, give it a go. Last edited by Robsradio; 20th Oct 2025 at 3:14 pm. Reason: Didn't read well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Tetrode
Join Date: May 2014
Location: South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
For all that I do like them though; on the two I have FM performance is pretty decent, so it is worth the effort involved in fixing one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
Nonode
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bristol, UK.
Posts: 2,311
|
Quote:
I agree - structurally the things are a nightmare - plastic that disintegrates if you as much as touch it, threads used that don't seem to match anything you've ever seen, and some parts, such as the threaded steel supporting pillars seemingly just driven by force into the plasic casing (perhaps while it was still hot from the mould). I spent weeks putting the thing back together with two-part epoxy, and it's never going to look respectable or anything other than shonky. The schematics are a nightmare to work with. I agree, however, that performance is quite good. |
||
|
|
|