|
Vintage Radio (domestic) Domestic vintage radio (wireless) receivers only. |
|
Thread Tools |
1st Sep 2010, 8:39 pm | #61 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 117
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
Purely as an observation -
Before going through the pain of changing the holder, if you have, or can get hold of, a B9A plug then it would be a simple matter to do cold resistance checks between plug pins and the relevant tags of the socket. If you use clip on probes then you can give the plug a good bashing / wiggling to see if the connections are sound under stress. Just a thought, before any more major surgery occurs... Parabola Ooooerrr, what am I doing in the radio section.... |
3rd Sep 2010, 10:14 pm | #62 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sussex, UK.
Posts: 161
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
I go away for a few days and miss all the fun!
There appears to be a theme, C4 and C14 appear on most early Murphy VHF front-end designs I've seen. My assumption as to their functionality is in-line with Herald's; both are for decoupling, with C14 having the additional task of keeping RF levels the same. I assume that, as (stated by Murphy) that as C4 is super-critical, it affects neutralisation. I also assume that C2 and C3 are for neutralisation, therefore failure of either one could cause the (unwanted) oscillations described. It might be worth asking in the wanted section for a can, or a scrap tuner! Last edited by TuningIndicator; 3rd Sep 2010 at 10:21 pm. Reason: tidying-up!, like a Womble! |
9th Sep 2010, 6:55 pm | #63 |
Octode
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 1,959
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
Michael brought the chassis to me, to see if I could help.
I did an initial test and confirmed what Jeffrey had found - i.e. Injecting 10.7MHz signal at the first IFT (top of L9) produced an output at the FM discriminator, but no signals could be heard when the tuner was connected instead of the generator. The 6L12 RF amp V1a did not seem to be taking current. The oscillator section V1b was definately oscillating as there was a negative bias on the C11 / R2 network connected to the grid coil. I re-tensioned valve base pins 1-3 but it made no difference, so I changed the 6L12 for an ECC85. This sorted out the RF amp and the anode volts fell to the correct value of 80V. I noticed that the tuner heater decoupler C67 was one of those torpedo shaped capacitors with banded colour codes that makes them look like resistors. I changed it for a 0.01uF disc ceramic, in case it was the cause of instability - it wasn't! When the tuner valve was removed and the set powered up, I saw that there was a large reading on the AVO I had connected to the FM discriminator stabilising capacitor when doing the IF test above. This had to be IF instability, as there was no signal input at this time. An attempt to measure the screen grid volts on the 6C12 produced loud noises from the speaker. I saw that there was another of those 'torpedo' caps decoupling the screen - C23. I changed that and immediately the discriminator output fell to zero, indicating the instability had been fixed. I could hear weak signals on FM from that point on, so I re-aligned the IF, and tuner using the procedures in the Murphy manual (damping C-R networks etc), which made a massive improvement. There was one further 'torpedo' cap that I found -C47, coupling the discriminator output to the volume control, so I changed that as well. It performs very well now and sounds excellent on FM, with its push-pull output. Ron Last edited by ronbryan; 9th Sep 2010 at 7:09 pm. |
9th Sep 2010, 7:05 pm | #64 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
Ron, well done. I made the wrong assumption that the IF was OK because I could inject 10.7MHz and hear something. Apart from the non-conducting RF amp the poor old tuner was OK all along. Shows how much experience I haven't got of working on FM radios. I had a feeling that I was having to inject rather too much signal at 10.7MHz to make it audible but I had absolutely no feel for what the sensitivity should be at the IF input.
|
9th Sep 2010, 7:13 pm | #65 |
Hexode
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bristol, UK.
Posts: 480
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
Ron is the man!
|
9th Sep 2010, 7:41 pm | #66 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,288
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
Yes. Well done Ron.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
9th Sep 2010, 8:19 pm | #67 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 6,644
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
Thank goodness that's sorted!!!!
Cheers, Steve P.
__________________
If we've always had it, why is the Car Boot open? You're not sneaking another Old TV in are you...? |
9th Sep 2010, 11:35 pm | #68 |
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wembley, Middlesex
Posts: 7,224
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
Believe it or not this is my first radio restoration.
Now I know that waxies must be generally be replaced on sight especially if they're in a position where they're blocking DC but i've never heard of those torpedo type capacitors. Of course my mistake was to think that just because a stage works on MW/LW it should be working on VHF just because the components around it are common to both. But I've never really worked on radio or should I say RF to that extent. My sincere thanks to Ron who had the patience to lovingly repair and realign the set for me. I'll take some pictures tomorrow when i reassemble the whole radiogram. |
10th Sep 2010, 12:56 am | #69 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 2,008
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
Quote:
__________________
I won't tell you how I discovered that. |
|
10th Sep 2010, 3:08 pm | #70 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sussex, UK.
Posts: 161
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
That's good news!
|
10th Sep 2010, 3:47 pm | #71 |
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wembley, Middlesex
Posts: 7,224
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
Some pictures,
The cabinet does need touching up but I'll leave that to the owner. Note the elongated controls on the Collaro conquest deck. |
10th Sep 2010, 3:49 pm | #72 |
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wembley, Middlesex
Posts: 7,224
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
And yet one more picture
|
13th Sep 2010, 8:08 am | #73 |
Nonode
Join Date: May 2006
Location: St Albans, Herts, UK.
Posts: 2,193
|
Re: Murphy A492 radiogram
A happy conclusion. Excellent news
__________________
All the very best, Tas |