|
Vintage Radio (domestic) Domestic vintage radio (wireless) receivers only. |
|
Thread Tools |
8th Nov 2014, 10:19 am | #61 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 14,007
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
The 840A has no voltage-regulation on either the LO or the BFO; unless your mains is very stable the tuning's always going to be a bit wandery. Even altering the RF Gain setting shifts the HT rail by several volts which shifts the tuning.
There are no screening cans on any of the 840A's valves. It could be worth swapping the BFO-valve with the audio-driver valve - they are both UAF42 - to see if this makes a difference. Swapping identical RF/IF valves round in TV sets to find the least-microphonic/drifty one was a sometimes-used trick in the 1950s. |
8th Nov 2014, 12:23 pm | #62 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 4,400
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
Oh, yes, I'm forgetting rather that the 840A is quite bare-bones- the C in the UCH42 doing the local oscillation and no anode feed stabilisation, either. A little like the 640. Still, resolving SSB will hone the safe-crackers fingers and develop patience...
|
8th Nov 2014, 1:13 pm | #63 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: W.Butterwick, near Doncaster UK.
Posts: 8,935
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
Think the black can will keep the heat in.
__________________
G8JET BVWS Archivist and Member V.M.A.R.S |
8th Nov 2014, 1:20 pm | #64 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,901
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
There were special corrugated spring steel cans which hugged the glass of valves and reduced temperatures. They turn up sometimes in Racal gear, but the usual bayonet screening can does increase temperature and drift.
David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
8th Nov 2014, 3:38 pm | #65 | |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
Quote:
Al. / Nov. 8, '14 // |
|
8th Nov 2014, 3:43 pm | #66 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
Just the converse. Consider aluminium heat-sinks for power transistors. For the same surface area and geometry, those that are finished in matt-black anodising have a greater heat-radiating capacity that those that are left untreated and plain aluminium. Classic physics covers all that in the concept of 'black body radiation'.
Al. |
10th Nov 2014, 10:44 pm | #67 |
Nonode
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 2,535
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
Well the drift its not so bad so as to be unmanageable, especially once it warms up. I also found it does drift a little on band 1 (11-30Mhz) as well, but given the frequencies involved thats perhaps not entirely surprising, especially given that there is no voltage regulation.
I have attached some pictures of the completed restoration. I have also added to some light to the display. Unfortunately, I made a slight mistake just before putting the vcase back on. I squirted some air duster down the display to remove some dust that had accummulated. Unfortunately, it has left a streak which is quite visible at certain angles and lighting conditions! I'm trying to figure out whether their is a way of cleaning it without disassembling it all again! |
10th Nov 2014, 11:40 pm | #68 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Papamoa Beach, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
Posts: 2,944
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
Quote:
One has the impression that the intention was that the receiver be operated with a protective earth connected to the case, quite reasonable since a chassis-to-case fault could result in a live case. But instead of having the case earthed via the power lead, it was done by a separate connection. Not the safest way to do things, but probably in keeping with the way things were often done in the 1950s. It looks as if it were done that way to allow a single earth connection to be used for both protective purposes and as a functional earth for the aerial system when an unbalanced aerial was used, and for that earth connection to be optimized from an RF viewpoint. Not good in today’s light; someone who thought they were installing an RF “aerial” earth might not fully address protective earth requirements, and anyway an independent protective earth would contravene code in some territories even though independent functional earths might be allowed. With the receiver fed from an outboard isolating transformer, earthing the case would be unnecessary and I think undesirable. But that would happen if the “E” socket were used to connect an “aerial” earth. With the case earthed in this way, a chassis-to-case fault would effectively earth one side of the isolating transformer secondary, something that would likely go unnoticed, but which would be potentially dangerous in that there would be a shock hazard between the other side of the secondary and earth, something unexpected in what was thought to be an isolated system. I think that there may be a “get out” though. The aerial shorting plus appears to bridge the second aerial socket to the same earthing point as is connected to the case by the “E” plug. If that is left out, then possibly the second aerial socket, normally used for the “other” side of a balanced aerial, could be connected to an independent RF functional earth (if the local code allows such). That way the case could be left unearthed to allow safe operation from an isolating transformer. Cheers, |
|
11th Nov 2014, 1:57 pm | #69 |
Nonode
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 2,535
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
Thanks Synchrodyne. This might explain why I found the jumper plugged into the centre pin (the second 'A'), while the other end sat unconnected in a hole at the position actually marked with the second 'A', i.e. in storage mode. The antenna wire was left plugged into the first 'A'. I was baffled by that especially when I saw that the instructions suggest that for a random wire antenna the jumper should connect the second 'A' to 'E'.
Since completing the electrical work I have been running it as per the instructions with the jumper bridging the second 'A' with the 'E' but I have also tried it with the jumper removed and could discern no difference in the reception. Given your observations, I will be running it without that jumper connected from now on. If I can get hold of another wander plug then I might perhaps connect a ground earth to the other 'A' rather than the 'E' socket. |
12th Nov 2014, 9:43 pm | #70 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 14,007
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
Quote:
The connections between the windings of the LO coil and the tags had clearly been soldered by someone with a room-temperature IQ and a soldering-iron only a few degrees hotter. On this basis I'm minded that you might find high-resistance-tending-towards-infinity issues in the windings of your coilbox. |
|
12th Nov 2014, 11:08 pm | #71 | ||
Nonode
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Leicester, UK
Posts: 2,535
|
Re: Eddystone 840A
Quote:
Quote:
Anyone added a 5th band to the spare set of contacts on one of these, say LW to VLF? |
||