|
Vintage Amateur and Military Radio Amateur/military receivers and transmitters, morse, and any other related vintage comms equipment. |
|
Thread Tools |
2nd May 2019, 10:24 am | #1 |
Heptode
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Preston, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 632
|
Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
I've got 3 15M coax cable runs to do.
One for an 11/10 vertical (sirio 2016) One for a rotatable 2 ele 6m yagi One for a rotatable 5 ele 2m yagi. do I ? 1) Forget the internet exists, wire everything with the Drum of RG58 I already have, and ignore the odd dB of loss here and there , because there's no one on the bands anyway until sporadic E season, and then I could have used bell wire. with the money I save I could buy another piece of radio related junk to play about with. 2) Spend £40 on a drum of RG8 mini, because it could be a lottery what spec its manufactured to and where, and I might get lucky, plus all the CB'ers are using it so it must be good, and I can use 25p PL259 connectors with it and solder them with my 25 watt antex. 3) Believe the hype and spend £130 on a drum of Paolo Nutini supeflex 7 linear crystal oxgygen free copper, hand braided by nymphs. with no loss figures quoted on the website, because "its so good it puts into shade the competitor cables of the same diameter " Hey, I might even get to work E-M-E. (shades of audiophoolery at RF ) 4) don't be so tight, buy a £50 drum of RG8, do all the cable runs with this, and be content in the satisfaction that nobody on facebook is going to be sneering at my antenna cabling Last edited by Steve G4WCS; 2nd May 2019 at 10:48 am. |
2nd May 2019, 10:42 am | #2 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: W.Butterwick, near Doncaster UK.
Posts: 8,935
|
Re: coax cable pontification, or dB per pound
Spend the £50 on new drum of RG8
__________________
G8JET BVWS Archivist and Member V.M.A.R.S |
2nd May 2019, 11:35 am | #3 |
Heptode
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tonbridge, Kent, UK.
Posts: 686
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Use your RG58 and buy beer. For a 15m run the only possibly significant losses will be on 2m, and with a 5 ele beam......
|
2nd May 2019, 11:48 am | #4 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Perching a deck chair on the roof and donning a rain mac is the best option.
For everything else there's stuffing more power down the feed or getting mugged for Belden H155 I find. I was going to attempt to build a masthead preamp for my 2m antics but it's hardly worth it for a slim jim on a fishing pole. |
2nd May 2019, 11:49 am | #5 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,899
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Mind you, there is some very nasty stuff being sold as RG58.
Best dissect a piece and see what the braid coverage is like before you use any. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
2nd May 2019, 11:54 am | #6 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Indeed. Moonraker palm off some half decent stuff at hamfests I've noticed. It's got excellent braid coverage. It's their "military spec" RG58. I doubt the credentials but it's what my HF antennna is fed with at the moment and I'm making contacts at 5W into the feed with it. Antenna is a poorly constructed 40/20m loaded inverted V in a tree.
Edit: this stuff: https://www.moonraker.eu/cable-conne...ohm-coax-cable |
2nd May 2019, 12:03 pm | #7 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: W.Butterwick, near Doncaster UK.
Posts: 8,935
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
I have bought that military grade from Moonraker, it is fine.
__________________
G8JET BVWS Archivist and Member V.M.A.R.S |
2nd May 2019, 12:36 pm | #8 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 14,007
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Quote:
|
|
2nd May 2019, 12:47 pm | #9 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
I can receive 15m on my antenna just about. I heard a guy about 5 miles away from me calling CQ on it via groundwave (he must have been putting out some watts!) and that was it in the last year.
|
2nd May 2019, 4:24 pm | #10 | |
Heptode
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newmarket, Suffolk, UK.
Posts: 612
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Scout around on eBay and local rallies - 15m is an "off cut" for many people
73 Fred G4BWP Quote:
|
|
2nd May 2019, 5:03 pm | #11 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St.Ippolyts, Hitchin, Hertfordshire QRA IO91UW
Posts: 3,518
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Personally, I wouldn't use RG58 above 30MHz - I use it in my shack to feed HF receivers from a distribution amplifier.
Anything that transmits starts in RG214 and transitions to Heliax as soon as it leaves the shack. Why go to the trouble of putting up beams if you are going to loose so much of the signal you want in lossy coaxial cables?
__________________
Engineers make things work and have spare bits when finished |
2nd May 2019, 7:06 pm | #12 |
Nonode
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK.
Posts: 2,015
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
RG214 for Jumpers on any band then LDF2-50 if not so far and only VHF.
Like up a tree - as mine is. House to shack at end of garden (30m?) is LDF4-50, patchable to use on VHF Low or High. All this H-100 and weird stuff - sorry don't trust it. RG223 and RG214 from a good cable house are OK for jumpers. Decent cable for long runs will cost you money. RG8 and RG58 - too many impersonators to know what you have. And in the original they were not that great anyway! |
2nd May 2019, 9:29 pm | #13 |
Octode
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bletchley, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Posts: 1,223
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
I use RG223 instead of RG58. Although it has similar loss, it has a better screen.
But the real reason is that nobody has yet ordered a Chinese factory to make the cheapest lookalike they can regardless of quality, to be shipped here by the container load and labelled as the proper stuff ... |
2nd May 2019, 9:46 pm | #14 |
Heptode
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Preston, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 632
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Don't know how I manage it but landed on a 25M length of RG-213 off of facebook for six quid. I've got a length already so will do 10 and 6 with this, will need a join but I'll do it on 10 from the bucket of N type plugs and line sockets in the shack, and invest in a length of ecoflex or paulo Nutini for 2, and I'm having a beer.
Cheers all For the replies. Trial assembled the 6M LFA tonight. |
2nd May 2019, 11:01 pm | #15 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hexham, Northumberland, UK.
Posts: 2,234
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Consider the extra cost of the connectors too. Brass LDF-xxx connectors were always pricey when I used to install it years ago. I have a box of "recycled" connectors saved over the years from de-installs so rarely actually buy them, but I would imagine that even for UR67 (or whatever the modern equivalent is) the connectors are getting pricey. I generally use decent quality RG58 but if the run is long or I need a bit of better performance I use UR67. For mobile installs I always use RG58.
Alan. |
3rd May 2019, 2:42 am | #16 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,899
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Shop around for connectors.
Compression mount N males for RG213 seemed to be twenty odd quid at Farnell and 8 quid at RS. The RS ones arrived on Tuesday, the brand formerly known as Greenpar, silver plated, fully satisfactory for my purposes. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
3rd May 2019, 9:49 am | #17 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Yeah also lurk on ebay. I managed to get a box of Amphenol BNC connectors still bagged for £30. I got 47 RG58 compression plugs, 37 bulkheads, 5 T pieces and a dead cockroach for that. They were all the nice silver plated ones. All still bagged apart from the cockroach They had N connectors as well but I didn't take them as I didn't have anything with N connectors on it at the time.
|
3rd May 2019, 10:18 am | #18 | |
Triode
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Les Salles Lavauguyon, France
Posts: 43
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Quote:
No PL259's ever escape the shack, outside it is all N Types and double covered with self-amalgamating and then insulation tape for UV resistance. LF 74m doublet is all balanced line from a Palstar BT1500A. Being in a lightning area I have a 3mm copper plate with all the grounds on bolts and tags using wide braid to the 4 ground rods and N Type bulkhead sockets for the coax feed-ins. First rumbles and I move the connectors to unused and grounded ports, a little hassle but way cheaper than a new FT-5000 or WHY, and the balanced line uses an old, ceramic, knife switch for grounding/connecting the feeders which are static bled each side with 300K resistors to ground. R. |
|
3rd May 2019, 10:39 am | #19 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
I wish they'd do away with PL259 full stop. The things are cancer. I've actually replaced the PL259 on my MFJ259 with a BNC.
My lightning protection: feed goes in the kitchen window. When there's a strike risk, the last 4m from the window into my operating position gets rolled up, chucked in a tesco bag with a cable tie around it and thrown out of the window |
3rd May 2019, 11:52 am | #20 | ||
Triode
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Les Salles Lavauguyon, France
Posts: 43
|
Re: Coax cable pontification, or dB per pound.
Quote:
Then the time I spent in Winchester fixing radios, and some that properly had a N Type for V/UHF but some gorilla had forced the de rigeur PL259 in there with water-pump pliers. . . . . . . . . Quote:
R. |
||