|
Homebrew Equipment A place to show, design and discuss the weird and wonderful electronic creations from the hands of individual members. |
|
Thread Tools |
21st Jul 2010, 9:39 pm | #1 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Salt Spring Island, BC, Canada
Posts: 368
|
One Tube Superhet
An interesting project for homebrewers is this one tube superhet. The article appeared in 1956 Popular Electronics entitled "Build the Minidyne"
It uses the pentode half of a 6U8 as a reflexed IF amp/audio output. the mixer is a diode. A second diode is used as the detector. The triode of the 6U8 is the local oscillator. The article can be found at http://home.gwi.net/~jdebell/pe/1956/ John. |
21st Jul 2010, 9:44 pm | #2 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Croydon, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 7,550
|
Re: One Tube Superhet
Gives real meaning to 'short superhet'...!
SB
__________________
There are lots of brilliant keyboard players and then there is Rick Wakeman..... |
22nd Jul 2010, 2:41 am | #3 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Salt Spring Island, BC, Canada
Posts: 368
|
Re: One Tube Superhet
I see an error on the schematic, the bottom of the volume control should be earthed.
John. Sorry, my error, the volume control is earthed through the secondary of the output transformer. John. Last edited by JHGibson; 22nd Jul 2010 at 2:43 am. Reason: My error |
22nd Jul 2010, 12:48 pm | #4 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: One Tube Superhet
Compared with this 1-valve reflex receiver, I see the following:
Minidyne has 3 tuned circuits giving selectivity (1 at RF, 2 at IF); the PW circuit has 2 (both at RF). Minidyne has 2 stages of amplification (pentode at IF, pentode at AF); the PW circuit has 3 (Pentode at RF; triode leaky-grid detector giving AF gain; pentode at AF). Minidyne has 2 diodes in signal path (cheating!); the PW circuit has none. My gut feeling is that the PW circuit should have the edge on sensitivity, plus lower noise and no oscillator radiation. But, interesting all the same! |
22nd Jul 2010, 6:00 pm | #5 |
Pentode
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 236
|
Re: One Tube Superhet
Here's a one-valve double-reflex superhet circuit, using a 6ME8 gated-beam valve to do, well, everything:
http://www.antiqueradios.com/forums/...ic.php?t=96539 |
24th Jul 2010, 10:10 pm | #6 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Salt Spring Island, BC, Canada
Posts: 368
|
Re: One Tube Superhet
After looking at the "One Tube Superhet" article, if you go to the parent directory, you will find a wealth of similar circuits.
John. |
24th Jul 2010, 10:34 pm | #7 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Croydon, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 7,550
|
Re: One Tube Superhet
Quote:
SB
__________________
There are lots of brilliant keyboard players and then there is Rick Wakeman..... |
|
24th Jul 2010, 11:02 pm | #8 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bewdley, Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 4,736
|
Re: One Tube Superhet
I have several spare ECF82s if you'd like one, free for the cost of postage - drop me a PM.
__________________
Phil Optimist [n]: One who is not in possession of the full facts |
5th Jul 2013, 5:41 pm | #9 | |
Triode
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wiles-Barre, PA USA
Posts: 34
|
Re: One Tube Superhet
Quote:
It turns out that the 6U8 tube makes a nice mixer/oscillator tube for small superhets, as seen in the 'SimpleX' circuit that was featured in QST and the Radio Amateur's Handbook in the 1960's: http://www.bignick.net/simple_x/images/SimpleX.pdf ....and here, subbing a 6EA8 for the 6U8: http://home.comcast.net/~btse1/vintrad/hb/1960s.htm The SimpleX is a nice circuit, but I'm thinking about just improving the original Minidyne. Then I looked in Phil's Valve Radio site: http://philsvalveradiosite.co.uk/phi...eceivers_1.htm ....and saw this: http://philsvalveradiosite.co.uk/phi...nverterone.jpg ECF82 = 6U8 I believe that Phil's circuit combined with the reflexed IF/AF stage using, perhaps, a 6AU6 in place of the 6U8's pentode section would be just the ticket to a much improved 'Minidyne' circuit. Perhaps call it a 'Minidyne 2' because it will then have 2 tubes. 6AU6 = EF94 Any thoughts about this idea? Last edited by Norm_N_Tam; 5th Jul 2013 at 6:09 pm. |
|
5th Jul 2013, 9:26 pm | #10 |
Triode
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wiles-Barre, PA USA
Posts: 34
|
Re: One Tube Superhet
I received the following reply from Phil, via email, regarding the above posts:
"Hi my friend. I have this moment had a look at the circuit and although the oscillator circuit is the same the mixer works slightly different which I will briefly explain. It is designed to reflex audio as well as RF which is the purpose of the diode mixer to give it that extra kick in gain and isolate the oscillator from audio so there for the pentode is acting as an AF and RF amplifier. As a result of this my circuit would be unsuitable. If you have not yet built the receiver then I would take my simple advice regarding reflex circuits. I built a 1 transistor reflex in the 70s and found it could only receive BBC Radio 4 at usable earphone volume and all the other stations were very faint, No better then a crystal set. Reflex receivers are also very critical in their layout and can be very temperamental. There are some very good circuits for regenerative receivers around and are much advised as a starter receiver and when experience is gained and funds allow you could also then move on to a superhet receiver. The choice is yours but I would stick to the original circuit and talking of the 250V HT line this set needs I don't think it would have stand a chance of giving speaker reception at lower voltages like some of the receivers of mine that you may come across due to only one active valve. The reason I mentioned this later statement is because 250V DC is a very lethal voltage to be dealing with if you have never worked with mains valved receivers before. I Wish you all the success in radio building and I hope you do get this receiver to work but take my advice, There are much better circuits around that will work at much safer voltages. Bye for now." Therefore, beginners beware of high HT circuits like this! Last edited by Norm_N_Tam; 5th Jul 2013 at 9:49 pm. |