|
Vintage Radio (domestic) Domestic vintage radio (wireless) receivers only. |
|
Thread Tools |
18th Nov 2020, 3:00 pm | #1 |
Hexode
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 391
|
Licence needed for Crystal Sets
Hello All
The attached advert from Meccano Magazine for July 1923 shows that different licences were needed for the two types of crystal set that Meccano was selling. Why did the RS1 need a license from any Post Office, whereas the RS2 needed a Postmaster General license, which presumably was harder to get? best regards ... Stef |
18th Nov 2020, 4:50 pm | #2 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 9,637
|
Re: License needed for Crystal Sets
The difference may be that one is a kit and the other ready made.
Zero to 1000m is a little exaggerated by modern standards, but this was early days and there was more than a little quackery in advertising then and for a long time after. |
18th Nov 2020, 5:14 pm | #3 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,427
|
Re: License needed for Crystal Sets
The kit one was probably an experimental licence, it seems that any radio that wasn’t complete required this type of licence. Lots of uncertainty about licences in the 1920’s lots of references to them.
23rd Dec 1922 page 394 WW. https://worldradiohistory.com/UK/Wir...ld-1922-12.pdf
__________________
Frank |
18th Nov 2020, 5:27 pm | #4 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Cumbria (CA13), UK
Posts: 6,118
|
Re: License needed for Crystal Sets
... and as much as the advertisers can get away with these days without falling foul of advertising standards!
__________________
Mending is better than Ending (cf Brave New World by Aldous Huxley) |
18th Nov 2020, 6:45 pm | #5 |
Hexode
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 391
|
Re: License needed for Crystal Sets
Many thanks Frank for the reference to WW. It would seem that the fear was that any home-built radio would oscillate and cause interference, hence the need for the more sophisticated license.
As we know once regeneration can cause interference whether the radio was home built or not. |
18th Nov 2020, 6:56 pm | #6 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,951
|
Re: License needed for Crystal Sets
There's quite a bit in "The Setmakers" about the difference between "receiving" and 'experimenter' licences and their timescales; in particular, was buying and assembling a kit [some of which were sold almost-completed, so you only just had to do a few bits yourself] really 'experimentation' or just a cunning way to escape paying the full licence-fee that would be required if you had bought a complete receiver?
|
18th Nov 2020, 8:59 pm | #7 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brentwood, Essex, UK.
Posts: 5,316
|
Re: License needed for Crystal Sets
Seems from the ad that both types of GPO licence cost the same (10/-). The set for experimental use doesn't seem to need the additional compulsory broadcasting fee (7/6d).
The ads in the WW article are fascinating! Last edited by emeritus; 18th Nov 2020 at 9:00 pm. Reason: Typos |
19th Nov 2020, 11:43 am | #8 |
Hexode
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 391
|
Re: License needed for Crystal Sets
Constructional details of the Meccano crystal set are shown in the June 1923 issue of MM.
The tuning capacitor design is clever. |
19th Nov 2020, 12:31 pm | #9 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Leominster, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 16,526
|
Re: License needed for Crystal Sets
Unless early Meccano was unpainted a fair amount of damage to finish would have been required for reliable operation
__________________
....__________ ....|____||__|__\_____ .=.| _---\__|__|_---_|. .........O..Chris....O |
19th Nov 2020, 1:01 pm | #10 |
Hexode
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 391
|
Re: License needed for Crystal Sets
That's a good point. That style of triangular plate was introduced in 1921 with nickel plating. In fact all the Meccano parts were nickel plated at that time.
The first painted (red) version didn't appear until 1926, the start of "The New Meccano" red/green era. If anyone is interested in the detailed history of various Meccano parts, see: http://www.nzmeccano.com/Parts.php |
11th Dec 2020, 3:32 pm | #11 |
Hexode
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 391
|
Re: Licence needed for Crystal Sets
Further to the licensing question, Modern Wireless for February 1923 reproduces the Experimental license.
This makes it clear that the license gives 'Authority for Receiving', allowing the license holder to experiment in receiver techniques, for which the applicant has to specify 'the nature and object of the experiments'. So how did amateurs get authority to transmit, both before and after the creation of the BBC in October 1922. best regards ... Stef |
11th Dec 2020, 5:17 pm | #12 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,799
|
Re: Licence needed for Crystal Sets
Look up "Artificial Aerial licence". You'll find out more about transmitting, and likely have a good laugh.
David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
12th Dec 2020, 3:07 am | #13 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brentwood, Essex, UK.
Posts: 5,316
|
Re: Licence needed for Crystal Sets
Wireless licences were introduced at the end of 1904. I have a facsimilie edition of the volume of "The Model Engineer and Electrician" for the second half of 1904 where this is mentioned several times, including letters from the Postmaster-General, as its implications were clarified. One thing the licence seems to have killed off at birth was Bassett-Lowke's experimental radio transmitter and receiver set which the ME had given a good review of.
|
12th Dec 2020, 10:51 am | #14 |
Hexode
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 391
|
Re: Licence needed for Crystal Sets
Many thanks for that reference. I'll take a look.
best regards ... Stef |