UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > General Vintage Technology > General Vintage Technology Discussions

Notices

General Vintage Technology Discussions For general discussions about vintage radio and other vintage electronics etc.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 1:12 pm   #1
HamishBoxer
Dekatron
 
HamishBoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: W.Butterwick, near Doncaster UK.
Posts: 8,923
Default Sputnik 1

The world’s first satellite, Sputnik 1, was launched on October 4, 1957, by the then Soviet Union that heralded it as a national triumph, and started the space race.

Not only was this an important achievement, but an historical milestone that opened space exploration.

The Russian language Radio magazine for radio amateurs published articles on the proposed telemetry system and the intended downlink frequencies. An English language version later appeared in the QST magazine of the ARRL.

The United States also revealed its intent to launch a satellite during the International Geophysical Year 1957 – but the USSR was first.

When launched it had four external antennas to transmit on 20.005 and 40.002 MHz at about 1 watt heard throughout the world by radio amateurs including those in Australia.

Sputnik, a 58 centimetre diameter polished metal sphere, was seen from Earth as it travelled 29,000 km/h taking 96.2 minutes for each orbit. It had no stabilisation system.

There were two aluminium casings that bolted together using a seal to create an air tight housing for two transmitters plus a simple temperature and pressure sensing system.

Scientists studying it garnered information, like the density of the upper atmosphere deduced from its drag on the orbit, and the propagation of its signals that helped better understand the ionosphere.

At a time the WWV time and frequency standard station near Fort Collins, Colorado USA stopped its night transmission on 20 MHz to avoid interference with the telemetry.

The signals continued for 21 days until the life of three silver-zinc batteries, two for the transmitters and the other for ventilation, ended 26 October. Sputnik burnt up and re-entered earth’s atmosphere on 4 January 1958.

To commemorate Sputnik 1, special callsign R60SAT will be on air from October 1 to 8. For further information including the awards available, please visit the qrz.com website.

Jim Linton VK3PC


PS I have 2 x R208 sat here from that era
__________________
G8JET BVWS Archivist and Member V.M.A.R.S
HamishBoxer is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 3:46 pm   #2
Nuvistor
Dekatron
 
Nuvistor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,427
Default Re: Sputnik 1

Yes I heard the 20 MHz signal, I also saw the trail in the sky, I thought it was the satellite but have since been told it was the launch rocket traveling somewhere behind Sputnik.

I don’t know which it was but I only heard the signal about the same time as the trail in the sky.
__________________
Frank
Nuvistor is online now  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 3:50 pm   #3
SteveCG
Nonode
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 2,495
Default Re: Sputnik 1

Just think of all those channel B1 TV sets where a small adjustment on the fine-tuning control may have revealed the new space age from the loud-speaker...
SteveCG is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 6:38 pm   #4
Dave Moll
Dekatron
 
Dave Moll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Cumbria (CA13), UK
Posts: 6,118
Default Re: Sputnik 1

I thought the sound on B1 was 41.5MHz, so 20MHz seems a bit of a stretch for fine-tuning.
__________________
Mending is better than Ending (cf Brave New World by Aldous Huxley)
Dave Moll is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 6:53 pm   #5
ms660
Dekatron
 
ms660's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
Default Re: Sputnik 1

40MHz?

Lawrence.
ms660 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 6:53 pm   #6
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,953
Default Re: Sputnik 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Moll View Post
I thought the sound on B1 was 41.5MHz, so 20MHz seems a bit of a stretch for fine-tuning.
But they could have heard the 40.02MHz Sputnik.

However back then pretty much all B1 TV transmitters were vertically-polarised, likewise the receiver-antennas - which would have had a significant polarisation-loss when trying to receive a transmitter located essentially straight-up!
G6Tanuki is online now  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 7:19 pm   #7
HamishBoxer
Dekatron
 
HamishBoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: W.Butterwick, near Doncaster UK.
Posts: 8,923
Default Re: Sputnik 1

http://www.northantstelegraph.co.uk/...aser-1-6678765 The R208 covers 40 MHz etc. Time to fire it up!
__________________
G8JET BVWS Archivist and Member V.M.A.R.S
HamishBoxer is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 7:36 pm   #8
AC/HL
Dekatron
 
AC/HL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 9,637
Default Re: Sputnik 1

With the exception of travelling wave tubes, this could be the only valved satellite flown?
AC/HL is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 7:44 pm   #9
Panrock
Nonode
 
Panrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 2,525
Default Re: Sputnik 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by G6Tanuki View Post
But they could have heard the 40.02MHz Sputnik.

However back then pretty much all B1 TV transmitters were vertically-polarised, likewise the receiver-antennas - which would have had a significant polarisation-loss when trying to receive a transmitter located essentially straight-up!
I was 7 years old but I remember the excitement! I seem to remember my Dad tried manipulating the fine tuner ring on our 17-inch Ekco in an attempt to pick up something, but was unsuccessful.
Panrock is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 7:55 pm   #10
AC/HL
Dekatron
 
AC/HL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 9,637
Default Re: Sputnik 1

Not all sets had the full complement of biscuits fitted, so depending where you lived CH1 might have been inoperative.
AC/HL is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 8:09 pm   #11
ParcGwyn
Hexode
 
ParcGwyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aberystwyth, Wales, UK.
Posts: 358
Default Re: Sputnik 1

Here is the schematic:
ftp://ftp.radio.ru/pub/2013/04/55.pdf

Dave

GW7ONS
ParcGwyn is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 8:17 pm   #12
VT FUSE
Hexode
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Malvern, Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 340
Default Re: Sputnik 1

Interesting point Bill.

The US made a point in their advertising of Nuvistors and use in the Mercury missions pre-Apollo,wonder if they did use them in satellite tech as well? I bet they did.
Fascinating how Sputnik used the rod pentodes and how well it all functioned on battery power alone inc powering onboard fans.
60 years ago, well, how time passes....
VT FUSE is online now  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 9:21 pm   #13
Panrock
Nonode
 
Panrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 2,525
Default Re: Sputnik 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC/HL View Post
Not all sets had the full complement of biscuits fitted, so depending where you lived CH1 might have been inoperative.
True. However, this was in Sundridge, near Sevenoaks, and Crystal Palace Ch.1 was our BBC transmitter.

Of more concern would have been the likely poor overhead response of our loft aerial and of course, the need to listen at the right time. I presume the tuner had a relatively broad sound IF bandwidth and this might have helped obtain reception, of some sort, down to 40 MHz.

Steve
Panrock is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 3:22 am   #14
egrandUS
Retired Dormant Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: St. Louis, Illinois, USA.
Posts: 22
Default Re: Sputnik 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by VT FUSE View Post
The US made a point in their advertising of Nuvistors and use in the Mercury missions pre-Apollo,wonder if they did use them in satellite tech as well? I bet they did.
Fascinating how Sputnik used the rod pentodes and how well it all functioned on battery power alone inc powering onboard fans.
60 years ago, well, how time passes....
I'm not sure Nuvistors were used in any satellites. Videcon tubes were the eyes of many early weather satellites though.

What RCA often failed to mention in their ads was that the Nuvistor tubes were actually part of the ground receiving equipment instead of satellites. However, they did make it into some other spacecraft and RCA did make some specialty tubes for Mercury onboard radios. And, the Soviets copied many Nuvistors for use in their equipment for decades.

If I remember correctly the first US satellite, Explorer I, was originally designed to use small long lead glass tubes. However, before its first launch it was redesigned for transistors.
egrandUS is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 3:27 am   #15
egrandUS
Retired Dormant Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: St. Louis, Illinois, USA.
Posts: 22
Default Re: Sputnik 1

One of the most interesting books I've ever read is called Sputnik: The Shock of the Century by Paul Dickson. It describes the roots of the US-Soviet space race and the earliest unmanned missions.
egrandUS is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 1:08 pm   #16
SteveCG
Nonode
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 2,495
Default Re: Sputnik 1

... yes, I was thinking of the 40 Mc/s signals with regard to B1 set fine tuning ...

As for getting the right time to listen for the short duration the sputnik would have been above the horizon - now there was a challenge in 1957!
SteveCG is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 2:10 pm   #17
Dave Moll
Dekatron
 
Dave Moll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Cumbria (CA13), UK
Posts: 6,118
Default Re: Sputnik 1

Apologies that I had been distracted away from the 40MHz signal (mentioned in the OP) by subsequent discussion of the 20MHz signal.
__________________
Mending is better than Ending (cf Brave New World by Aldous Huxley)
Dave Moll is offline  
Old 3rd Oct 2017, 6:54 pm   #18
emeritus
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brentwood, Essex, UK.
Posts: 5,316
Default Re: Sputnik 1

I did read of a proposal to use valves for at least some of the electronics of a probe for landing on the surface of Venus or Mercury, where the surface temperature is greater than the maximum operating temperature of semiconductors, but don't know if it was implemented.
emeritus is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2017, 6:57 am   #19
dsergeant
Octode
 
dsergeant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire,UK.
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: Sputnik 1

I think there will be quite a lot of coverage in the media today. They played a clip of Sputnik at the start of the Today programme this morning with an item on it to follow sometime.
Dave
dsergeant is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2017, 8:08 am   #20
ParcGwyn
Hexode
 
ParcGwyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Aberystwyth, Wales, UK.
Posts: 358
Default Re: Sputnik 1

This is an interesting program about a school in Northamptonshire that tracked early Soviet satellites and calculated the launch site:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59s_d7YVC6o&t=5s

Dave

GW7ONS
ParcGwyn is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 9:52 pm.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.