UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > Specific Vintage Equipment > Vintage Test Gear and Workshop Equipment

Notices

Vintage Test Gear and Workshop Equipment For discussions about vintage test gear and workshop equipment such as coil winders.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 11th May 2022, 8:40 pm   #41
Radio Wrangler
Moderator
 
Radio Wrangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,871
Default Re: Mr.French's Dynamic Mutual Conductance Tester.

34mA in the triode-connected list, 48mA in the pentode-connected list for the EL84, with appropriately different Vg1 bias values.... Enough to give a noticeable difference in Gm just from that, so the ratio of Ia to Ig2 is easily lost.

David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done
Radio Wrangler is online now  
Old 12th May 2022, 9:52 am   #42
ms660
Dekatron
 
ms660's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
Default Re: Mr.French's Dynamic Mutual Conductance Tester.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Radio Wrangler View Post
34mA in the triode-connected list, 48mA in the pentode-connected list for the EL84, with appropriately different Vg1 bias values.... Enough to give a noticeable difference in Gm just from that, so the ratio of Ia to Ig2 is easily lost.
I think there's a misunderstanding, do the calcs using the same Va-Vg voltages as the pentode, I make it not a lot of difference, compared to the KT88.

Lawrence.
ms660 is offline  
Old 12th May 2022, 11:40 am   #43
Radio Wrangler
Moderator
 
Radio Wrangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,871
Default Re: Mr.French's Dynamic Mutual Conductance Tester.

True, there is not a lot of difference. But we're going round the same circle again.

Strapping G2 to A to put a pentode or a tetrode into 'triode mode' for the purpose of measuring its Gm, as asked in post 33, does introduce a SMALL error in the result. Not strapping it avoids this error, so why not avoid the error and get a more accurate result.

Most people, if offered a choice between a 100 gramme and a 105 gramme bar of the same chocolate for the same price in a shop would not choose the disadvantaged deal. Even though the difference is small.

Errors are best avoided if they can be. If avoidance has a cost, then a judgement has to be made on whether it's worthwhile, but if it's easy then it's the proverbial no-brainer.

Small errors can be insidious, they can be cumulative, and systematic errors tend in this direction, so minimising errors is a good habit.

David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done
Radio Wrangler is online now  
Closed Thread




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:50 am.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.