|
General Vintage Technology Discussions For general discussions about vintage radio and other vintage electronics etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
17th Aug 2017, 11:16 am | #1 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 8,833
|
Shorten FM aerial elements?
My roof mounted, vertically orientated single dipole FM elements are 75cm each (each half). I want to shorten them to obtain better performance in the higher frequencies (100 - 108MHz) as stations in that frequency band are generally quite weaker than the BBC ones that are positioned at 88.3 to 92.7MHz and perform very well (I don't count BBC R1!). I also use the dipole for DAB transmissions and so they too will also be helped a tad by shortening the elements. All my feeders, distribution etc are all in place and fine. How much should each element be shortened? I'm not looking for a 100% 'spot on' perfect answer (if only aerials were so predictable) just something that will, in general terms help achieve my stated aim, so please keep it simple and to the point guys.
__________________
A digital radio is the latest thing, but a vintage wireless is forever.. |
17th Aug 2017, 11:20 am | #2 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,966
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Just calculate the wavelength from the frequency and halve it. I don't think it will make a lot of difference though, so may not be worth the hassle, especially if it involves getting on the roof.
It won't make any difference at the DAB frequencies. |
17th Aug 2017, 12:53 pm | #3 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Leominster, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 16,536
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
You won't notice any improvement less than 3dB or so and you won't see anything like that from a bit of element trimming.
If you fancy a bit of aerial building and rigging, you could try a 5/8 wave design. Popular for mobile two metres back in the day. http://www.qsl.net/w4sat/five8th.htm
__________________
....__________ ....|____||__|__\_____ .=.| _---\__|__|_---_|. .........O..Chris....O |
17th Aug 2017, 12:54 pm | #4 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,433
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Each leg being 75cm would mean it is already cut for 100Mhz, I cannot see it making a lot of difference moving it up a few MHz.
Frank |
17th Aug 2017, 2:30 pm | #5 |
Nonode
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Redruth, Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 2,579
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Hi.
I wondered about building a tunable active aerial for the VHF broadcast band so that weaker stations could be received more clearly. Has anyone gone down this route and can recommend a suitable aerial and active amplifier circuit? Regards Symon. |
17th Aug 2017, 2:33 pm | #6 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 8,833
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Ok, I tend to agree. All said and done I'll leave it as it is. Thanks guys.
__________________
A digital radio is the latest thing, but a vintage wireless is forever.. |
17th Aug 2017, 5:07 pm | #7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
A J pole might be worth a thought.
|
17th Aug 2017, 5:12 pm | #8 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Shortening the elements to get a small improvement above 100MHz would have made it worse for DAB, so good that you have decided not to do it. This is because improving the quarterwave match at, say 105MHz, would worsen the halfwave match at 210MHz.
|
18th Aug 2017, 9:42 am | #9 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 8,833
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Brilliant deduction, I hadn't thought of it in 'wavelength terms', just length!
__________________
A digital radio is the latest thing, but a vintage wireless is forever.. |
18th Aug 2017, 10:16 am | #10 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Quarter wave?
Lawrence. |
18th Aug 2017, 12:30 pm | #11 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,433
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Steves FM aerial is indeed a half wave dipole, this will have an impedance of around 75ohms at 100 MHz, at 200 MHz the impedance will high, i.e a bad match but as these things usually are it will receive some signal on 200Mhz, just not produce the best results but if good enough that's ok.
An interesting artefact, if that's the correct term, is the 3rd harmonic will also present a reasonable match, this was useful on the amateur band 2 meters, a half wave dipole for reception works quite well on 70Cms. Possibly a reason why some Band 1 aerials worked quite well on Band 3, depending on the relationship between the channels used. Frank |
18th Aug 2017, 12:37 pm | #12 |
Hexode
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Malvern, Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 347
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
By definition,a roof mounted VHF Yagi will have sufficient gain and fair bandwidth for receiving duties in most circumstances,I note your desire to improve signals at the top end of the FM band however.
Especially important at VHF is feeder loss,maybe worth making sure that you use the best quality possible to minimise feeder loss especially if it is a fair lengthI wonder how old your present feeder is? Also a suitable masthead amplifier may yield results but unless carefully designed and implemented may just serve to raise noise. |
18th Aug 2017, 12:45 pm | #13 |
Hexode
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Malvern, Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 347
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Sorry,just re-read your post and note your comments of feeders which I failed to note.
|
18th Aug 2017, 4:22 pm | #14 | ||
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
18th Aug 2017, 4:36 pm | #15 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: near Reading (and sometimes Torquay)
Posts: 3,099
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
What will be much more significant is how the feeder is attached to a vertical dipole. If you don't have a balun then I suggest that what you consider to be the aerial is probably not doing so much, especially as it is a terrible match for DAB.
I am guessing that you are (as so often happens) just receiving using the coax outer. The dipole sort-of joins it up, rather badly. If so then the size of it will not be well defined. |
18th Aug 2017, 10:55 pm | #16 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hexham, Northumberland, UK.
Posts: 2,234
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
I have used a masthead amp on an FM antenna at my location as some of the stations are a bit weak here too. It is a Velleman kit, available from ESR, and you can configure it to be supplied with power via the coax. Makes quite a worthwhile improvement. I think Bowood also do a similar sort of thing.
Alan. |
19th Aug 2017, 6:57 am | #17 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 8,833
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
Quote:
__________________
A digital radio is the latest thing, but a vintage wireless is forever.. |
|
19th Aug 2017, 8:08 am | #18 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: near Reading (and sometimes Torquay)
Posts: 3,099
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
At VHF a balun can be done quite trivially.
So a clamp-on ferrite near the feed point is a simple solution. Better is to make a small loop of the coax so it runs more than once through the ferrite clamp (now needs a bigger hole). But not too small a loop or you damage the coax. I usually put another clamp balun a bit further along the coax, where it has got well away from the aerial itself. If you have any doubts about the tuner's balance requirements (as some were meant not for coax but twin line) then put another one down near the tuner. This should then ensure that it is the aerial and not the feeder that is doing the work. But of course, if the aerial is inappropriate as yours sounds it is (on DAB) then this may just make it worse as the coax outer acts as a great big vertical wire. |
19th Aug 2017, 8:19 am | #19 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
A folded dipole has a wider bandwidth, maybe one for FM and one for DAB, I'm sure they're available with transformers.
If you want the best reception then you need a proper antenna system. Lawrence. |
19th Aug 2017, 10:32 am | #20 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Derby, UK.
Posts: 7,735
|
Re: Shorten FM aerial elements
I made a1.5-wave (0.75 + 0.75) folded dipole for FM reception, which worked better here (deep in a valley) than an earlier, 0.25 + 0.25- wave attempt.
__________________
If I have seen further than others, it is because I was standing on a pile of failed experiments. |