|
Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets. |
|
Thread Tools |
22nd Mar 2018, 11:07 am | #21 | |||
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Calculating flux density in a flat conductor
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You can see from the photo that I posted in post no14 that we're getting 160nS rise time from the overcurrent monitoring current transformer and passive circuitry. This is 30 times faster than the shut-down window, if we call this just 5uS for safety. Ok, so there's an op amp and another IC as active components after this but the whole shutdown cycle will be less than 0.5us
__________________
Al Last edited by Al (astral highway); 22nd Mar 2018 at 11:16 am. |
|||
22nd Mar 2018, 12:07 pm | #22 |
Heptode
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 901
|
Re: Calculating flux density in a flat conductor
Al, for that test waveform in #14, did you gauge the delay between the squarewave input signal, and your sensed signal ?
Are you able to test the CT somehow (prior to its final application) when the input signal is say a combination of that squarewave and a separate high current signal of the level that a 150A waveform will generate, to see what core saturation may occur? Sorry, but I'm a bit hazy on the braid location. Is the braid in the tank circuit, or one switch leg of the H-bridge, or combining the currents from the top and bottom legs of the H-bridge? |
22nd Mar 2018, 3:08 pm | #23 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Calculating flux density in a flat conductor
Hello, I won’t be able to find anything like 150A pulses until I’ve built the half bridge and tested it. I might be able to rig up a class E amplifier stage to my square wave generator and get 20A pulses as a compromise, but I’d rather just build the DC bus and half bridge and get involved with the control circuitry.
Saturation is an issue with these designs : thanks for pointing it out . I note it is sometimes handled by having two cascaded CT’s. I’ll do the delay test that’ you mention in your first paragraph . The braid (if indeed I use it - I could also use silver-coated Teflon covered wire, 12 gauge ), as I have some) will be in the short conductor to the tank circuit . It will carry pulses from the DC bus, alternating +340 and -340V.
__________________
Al |
22nd Mar 2018, 3:14 pm | #24 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Calculating flux density in a flat conductor
Afterthought
Theoretically only, what would happen as the toroid internal diameter became smaller and smaller, contracting around the conductor inside it? Eventually, what if it became the same size as and then smaller than the diameter of the conductor? I visualised this as e.g a copper pipe with the toroid and CT inside it. It’s only a thought- experiment but I can’t converge on a result. Kalee20 ‘s post no. 20 is relevant and inspired this Q.
__________________
Al |
22nd Mar 2018, 3:30 pm | #25 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 4,993
|
Re: Calculating flux density in a flat conductor
The magnetic field in a conducting tube is zero. So the signal picked up by a toroid inside a conducting tube is also zero.
See eg http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~jstiles/220/...%20Current.pdf |
22nd Mar 2018, 4:26 pm | #26 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Calculating flux density in a flat conductor
I've now got a squarewave input pulse of 45nS. The output is 160nS, to there's your delay, roughly 100nS.
__________________
Al |
22nd Mar 2018, 6:32 pm | #27 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,088
|
Re: Calculating flux density in a flat conductor
Quote:
The total field around a closed path depends on the current passing through the path. So if all the current is happening outside the toroidal core, with no current going through its hole, then the field in the core will be zero. It's good to carry out these thought experiments, they serve as a good sanity check! Last edited by kalee20; 22nd Mar 2018 at 6:33 pm. Reason: Add last sentence |
|