UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > Other Discussions > Homebrew Equipment

Notices

Homebrew Equipment A place to show, design and discuss the weird and wonderful electronic creations from the hands of individual members.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st Nov 2013, 10:30 am   #1
Neil Purling
Nonode
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hull, East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 2,087
Default The well-behaved valve TRF

I have made several over the years, with different valve combinations.
It doesn't make any difference, but they are all inclined to squeal when I want to wind the volume right up.
I assume that there's still RF content in the signal that passes through the two audio stages & somehow that is getting back to the detector.
Old TRF designs of the 1920's had the detector transformer-coupled to the audio stage/s.
So, would purchase of a transformer instead of coupling the detector to the first audio stage with a 0.01uf capacitor effect a cure?
What ratio should I buy? I see 3:1 & 5:1 ratios.
I would never buy one unless it'd been resistance tested across each winding.
Neil Purling is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2013, 10:50 am   #2
GMB
Dekatron
 
GMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: near Reading (and sometimes Torquay)
Posts: 3,099
Default Re: The well-behaved valve TRF

If it is RF instability then you should see a big difference by putting a small value capacitor across the audio.

But it may well just be AF instability due to layout issues. I used to have big problems with this when I was a child, mainly because I couldn't afford to make a chassis out of metal.

Transformer coupling does make it easier to avoid such problems.
GMB is online now  
Old 21st Nov 2013, 11:04 am   #3
PJL
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Seaford, East Sussex, UK.
Posts: 5,997
Default Re: The well-behaved valve TRF

Well behaved TRF's are normally have good screening between the audio and RF stages.
PJL is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2013, 11:16 am   #4
Ed_Dinning
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK.
Posts: 8,195
Default Re: The well-behaved valve TRF

Hi Neil, quite often an RF choke was also included in the anode circuit in series with the AF transformer.

Ed
Ed_Dinning is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2013, 12:59 pm   #5
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 14,007
Default Re: The well-behaved valve TRF

Another useful trick is to put a resistor of about 10K in series with the feed to the grid of any audio-stages. Wire it *right next to* the grid terminal on the valve-base with minimal lead-length.

The resistor, coupled with the few picofarads of grid-to-cathode capacitance, acts as a low-pass filter and removes the RF without unduly attenuating the audio component.
G6Tanuki is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2014, 2:13 pm   #6
Neil Purling
Nonode
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hull, East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 2,087
Default Re: The well-behaved valve TRF

I wondered whether there was RF getting along the HT line or not.
I added another HT transformer to the PSU: One for the detector, the other for the audio stages.
A dramatic difference, but the PSU is 50% of the chassis space.
You really do need screened cable anywhere that is carrying an audio signal:
To & from the volume 'pot.
Between the anode of the pre-amp and grid #1 of the 6V6.
I can now wind the volume right up to '10' without a single squeak, no need for a grid-stopper resistor on the 6V6.

I have got a HF choke to add in the feed to the anode of the detector.
Maybe I can strip out the extra transformer even without using the choke?
Neil Purling is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2014, 4:42 pm   #7
Skywave
Rest in Peace
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
Arrow Re: The well-behaved valve TRF

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil Purling View Post
I wondered whether there was RF getting along the HT line or not.
I added another HT transformer to the PSU: One for the detector, the other for the audio stages: a dramatic difference.
Which suggests that the original design with one common PSU had inadequate decoupling between the detector and audio stages. That unwanted coupling could have been caused by several things: inadequate HT decoupling; inadequate screening; common earth currents (poor earthing arrangements), amongst other things.

Al.
Skywave is offline  
Closed Thread




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:14 pm.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.