UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > General Vintage Technology > Components and Circuits

Notices

Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 20th Apr 2019, 10:44 pm   #1
line sync
Heptode
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kinver, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 634
Default Capacitors values

I have some capacitors with values I don't understand , 102 , 104 , 223 , 474, etc.
Does anyone know how to convert to pf , nf or mfd ?

Robin
line sync is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2019, 10:51 pm   #2
sortedradio
Heptode
 
sortedradio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 655
Default Re: capacitors values

The first two digits are the value, the last digit is the number of zeros giving the capacitance in pF. eg 104 is 100000pF or 0.1uF
__________________
Martin
BVWS member
GQRP Club
sortedradio is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2019, 6:46 am   #3
Diabolical Artificer
Dekatron
 
Diabolical Artificer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sleaford, Lincs. UK.
Posts: 7,658
Default Re: capacitors values

A 1u or 1 micro farad cap is 0.000,001, a 1p or 1 picofarad is 0.000,000,000,001, as Martin says the last digit = how many zero's is after the value, but if you write out 100n as 10/0,000, 10n as 10,/000 1n as 1,/000 etc, etc light dawns . It can get mindbending as 1n is 1000p and some folk don't use nano, especially older schematic's and some suppliers search engines. Some caps are marked mmf, which is micro, micro farads, easier if all caps (or any components come to that) came with a big label with big clear print on like the bottles Alice had : )

Andy.

Andy.
__________________
Curiosity hasn't killed this cat...so far.
Diabolical Artificer is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2019, 6:18 pm   #4
Maarten
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Haarlem, Netherlands
Posts: 4,199
Default Re: capacitors values

Just read them as if they were colour codes on resistors with pf as a base unit.

103 = brown black orange = 10k = 10kpf = 10nf = 0.01uf

Before standardisation, sometimes k or kpf was indeed used in schematics in stead of nf.
Maarten is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2019, 6:30 pm   #5
julie_m
Dekatron
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Derby, UK.
Posts: 7,735
Default Re: capacitors values

What was the aversion to "nano" all about?
__________________
If I have seen further than others, it is because I was standing on a pile of failed experiments.
julie_m is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2019, 6:33 pm   #6
stevehertz
Dekatron
 
stevehertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 8,831
Default Re: capacitors values

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maarten View Post
Just read them as if they were colour codes on resistors with pf as a base unit.

103 = brown black orange = 10k = 10kpf = 10nf = 0.01uf

Before standardisation, sometimes k or kpf was indeed used in schematics in stead of nf.
How to bring in another step of confusion! As explained, the basic meaning is adequate and easy to understand. No need to complicate matters IMO.
__________________
A digital radio is the latest thing, but a vintage wireless is forever..
stevehertz is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2019, 8:51 pm   #7
G8HQP Dave
Rest in Peace
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
Default Re: Capacitors values

Be careful with 'mfd'. It could be that the person meant 'uF' (microfarad) or 'mF' (millifarad), although the former is more likely.
G8HQP Dave is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2019, 9:06 pm   #8
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,998
Default Re: Capacitors values

Quote:
Originally Posted by G8HQP Dave View Post
Be careful with 'mfd'. It could be that the person meant 'uF' (microfarad) or 'mF' (millifarad), although the former is more likely.
Yes it can be very confusing: equally, in the 1930s/early-1940s it was quite common to come across US circuit-diagrams where "M" was used to indicate Kilohms. I've got an official RCA schematic for the AR88 which has grid-resistors labelled as "330M" which at first glance makes no sense, until you look further and find a potentiometer labelled "2MEG" and so get to retune your powers-of-ten-sense.
G6Tanuki is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2019, 11:07 pm   #9
line sync
Heptode
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kinver, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 634
Default Re: Capacitors values

Thanks for all your help guys.

Robin
line sync is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2019, 12:29 am   #10
Maarten
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Haarlem, Netherlands
Posts: 4,199
Default Re: capacitors values

Quote:
Originally Posted by julie_m View Post
What was the aversion to "nano" all about?
I don't think it was aversion, just not the usual way to express values.
Maarten is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2019, 12:32 am   #11
Maarten
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Haarlem, Netherlands
Posts: 4,199
Default Re: capacitors values

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevehertz View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maarten View Post
Just read them as if they were colour codes on resistors with pf as a base unit.

103 = brown black orange = 10k = 10kpf = 10nf = 0.01uf

Before standardisation, sometimes k or kpf was indeed used in schematics in stead of nf.
How to bring in another step of confusion! As explained, the basic meaning is adequate and easy to understand. No need to complicate matters IMO.
Well, it makes a good parallel with the way resistors are marked so you could also think of it as easy to remember. 103 is always 10k, whether it be a resistor or a capacitor. Also: some capacitors use colour codes (bumble bees, MELF, axial ceramics) and some resistors (specifically SMD) use the same numbering system.

Last edited by Maarten; 22nd Apr 2019 at 12:38 am.
Maarten is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2019, 1:42 am   #12
joebog1
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mareeba, North Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,704
Default Re: Capacitors values

Perhaps this read is OK? from Homo Ludens website:



Q: Your schematic so-and-so shows a capacitor having a value of 33n. I've never in my life seen anything like that. I only know uF and pF as units for capacitance. Is the n a typo?

A: You surely live in the USA, where nF (or just plain n, when it's obvious that it refers to a capacitance value) strangely is seldom used. Instead it is widely used all over the rest of the world. The basic unit of capacitance is the Farad, its symbol being F. This basic unit can be used together with any of the prefixes of the International System of Units, such as m for milli, u (or more correctly the Greek letter mu) for micro, n for nano, or p for pico. So, 1F = 1,000mF = 1,000,000uF = 1,000,000,000nF = 1,000,000,000,000pF. And in a schematic, often the F isn't printed because it's obvious, so you will see capacitances specified in p, n, u, or sometimes even m.

To an excellent website :https://ludens.cl/index.html

Joe
joebog1 is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2019, 8:59 am   #13
Restoration73
Nonode
 
Restoration73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Surbiton, SW London, UK.
Posts: 2,801
Default Re: Capacitors values

What was BS1852 brought in using the unit as a decimal point for values exceeding 1 unit.

e.g. 2.2k = 2k2, and for capacitors 2.2n = 2n2. It is possible to see n47 = 470p, but less
common. One magazine adopted 0u1 (= 100nF = 0.1uF) but no manufacturer used this.

The numerical system on inductors relates to 1uH, so 103 = 10,000uH = 10mH.
Restoration73 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:48 pm.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.