|
Homebrew Equipment A place to show, design and discuss the weird and wonderful electronic creations from the hands of individual members. |
|
Thread Tools |
3rd Aug 2011, 1:24 pm | #1 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Rotary contact switch concerns
I'm in the process of restoring a 45 year old, homebrew, electric clock. It uses rotary, sliding contact switches to change the time (please see attached photo).
I have two concerns. Firstly I'm worried about premature wear (and interference), because of arcing, as the contacts (both made of brass) rotate. Secondly, I have a feeling metal is going to be deposited, onto the tufnol, leading to shorts. Is there anything, simple, like changing the type of metal used for the sliding contacts or some sort of lubricant that will help? TIA David |
3rd Aug 2011, 1:35 pm | #2 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 389
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Is there a sprung loaded plunger** within the post/handle or is just a solid post/handle ?
Brass is soft as you realise , there's bound to be some wear depending on the friction caused by the above? ** If not could be an idea |
3rd Aug 2011, 2:00 pm | #3 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Yep, You're spot on. They're 1/8" diameter and spring loaded.
David |
3rd Aug 2011, 2:10 pm | #4 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 389
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Quote:
Unless you're thinking of constantly adjusting it every day ? |
|
3rd Aug 2011, 2:21 pm | #5 |
Nonode
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Preston, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 2,511
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
I'm confused as to what these switches are doing. Are they just used to set the time manually, or are they rotating all the time?
What mechanism actually measures the passage of time? Andy |
3rd Aug 2011, 3:38 pm | #6 | ||
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Quote:
Hi Andy, The switches are driven by a synchronous motor. From left to right, the first switch displays minutes on nixie tubes, the second one display the tens of minutes and the third one does the hours. Regards David |
||
8th Aug 2011, 12:46 am | #7 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Leominster, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 16,536
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Looks like Meccano spindles and wiper elements...... ingenious, but as you surmise, probably not great for longevity. Did (would) the nixies go out briefly at digit change time? Or was there some latch and release circuit employed?
__________________
....__________ ....|____||__|__\_____ .=.| _---\__|__|_---_|. .........O..Chris....O |
8th Aug 2011, 10:42 am | #8 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Hi Chris,
It's early days and I haven't really paid much attention to the speed of the digits changing but it should be quite quick. If you look at the attached photo you'll see the other side to these switches and how they are moved. The switches don't move in real time (slowly) but are moved, quickly, by levers. The other, clever, part of their design is the 1/8" gap between the fixed contacts and the 1/8" diameter of the moving contact, theoretically, leaving no gap in the transition from one digit to another... Unfortunately, I suspect, it's this large, flat, surface area of the moving contact that's contributing to the arching. David |
8th Aug 2011, 11:00 am | #9 |
Octode
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 1,960
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Have you tried a series C-R snubbing network between each fixed contact and the moving contact? This technique is used to reduce arcing in relay contacts and could be tried on a few adjacent contacts without too much effort.
If you know the voltage and current you are switching, the C and R values can be calculated as per this link http://www.industrologic.com/mechrela.htm Otherwise 0.1uF and 47 to 100 ohms come to mind. Alternatively, maybe you could devise a means of electronically switching off the applied voltage during the switching process by deriving a strobe signal from the motor shaft. Ron Last edited by ronbryan; 8th Aug 2011 at 11:07 am. Reason: Added strobe idea. |
8th Aug 2011, 12:33 pm | #10 |
Octode
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southport, Merseyside, UK.
Posts: 1,156
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
|
8th Aug 2011, 1:47 pm | #11 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Hi Ron. Thanks for your suggestions. Unfortunately I don't want to, drastically, alter the original design. I did hope somebody would suggest a way of making the, easily replaced, moving contacts sacrificial (or something like that) but if I have to, I'll live with it's shortcomings and only use it occasionally.
Hi John, I've never heard of a "Geneva mechanism" but after searching about it on Google I can see the similarity. Thanks David |
8th Aug 2011, 5:51 pm | #12 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
If they are make before break it shouldn't be a problem, I also suspect the double digit phenomenom won't happen either, the striking voltage being higher than the maintaining.
|
8th Aug 2011, 6:50 pm | #13 | |
Octode
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southport, Merseyside, UK.
Posts: 1,156
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Quote:
John |
|
8th Aug 2011, 11:38 pm | #14 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Hi MM, That's a very good point! Unfortunately the contacts have a tenancy to lift their front edges as they rotate, reducing their contact area under the required 1/8". The designer of this clock made a note of this problem (I have the design notes) and he toyed with an idea to file a V into the moving contact so it would always make a contact across the, required, 1/8". Unfortunately, the ability of the round contacts to rotate spoilt this idea. You've got me thinking though and I'm wondering if should make some square moving contacts with a V in them .
Quote:
Thanks David |
|
9th Aug 2011, 12:36 am | #15 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Leominster, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 16,536
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
It does look like this served its original purpose well, it sounds like the designer learned from it that perhaps it was not the best way to control the Nixies, ingenious though it is. There is always going to be a longterm wear issue with any sort of wiping contact mechanism. Maybe the carbon brush idea, but with narrow radial slots between the fixed contacts would cure the conductive path problem?
Tricky to think of anything obvious without throwing lots of (cheap) modern technology at it!
__________________
....__________ ....|____||__|__\_____ .=.| _---\__|__|_---_|. .........O..Chris....O |
9th Aug 2011, 6:46 am | #16 | |
Octode
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southport, Merseyside, UK.
Posts: 1,156
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Quote:
That should be an improvement, it would make it like a dynamo commutator, also are the spring loaded contacts and the fixed ones both made of brass? If so making one of them, presumably the easiest to modify, the sprung one, from a different metal should help with wear, perhaps a steel ball bearing if the gap was not too big? John |
|
9th Aug 2011, 7:15 am | #17 |
Octode
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Linkoping, Sweden
Posts: 1,465
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
My mind finally worked again and I now remembered that the magazines "The Radio Constructor" and "Electronic Engineering" published designs like this during the 1960s. If I remember correctly there were special motorized "counting" units that could be bought and used for each digit. I also know that "Practical Electronics" in the March issue from 1965 has the same kind of clock on page 324 - 327. I have that magazine somewhere, but I do not know exactly where right now so if I don't send you a copy of that article in the near future (if you can't find it at a local library) please remind me again.
__________________
Martin, Sweden Last edited by Dekatron; 9th Aug 2011 at 7:16 am. Reason: Spelling..... |
9th Aug 2011, 8:01 am | #18 | |
Octode
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Posts: 1,522
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Quote:
Neon bulbs and capacitors don't really mix, you could end up with a set of disco lights! I think using a carbon brush would be beneficial, though is arcing really a problem? I'd expect the contacts would only be handling a few mA's. Leakage between contacts could be more of a problem. Rob.
__________________
We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing. |
|
9th Aug 2011, 10:34 am | #19 | |||
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Quote:
Hi John, I'll try this idea first, as it's the easiest. Hopefully the switch will move quickly enough, so the delay between numbers isn't too bad. Quote:
Quote:
Thanks David |
|||
9th Aug 2011, 2:34 pm | #20 |
Tetrode
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 85
|
Re: Rotary contact switch concerns
Hi Dave,
I built the clock mentioned by Dekatron from the March 1965 issue of Practical Electronics in 1965 and it is still running today! It relies on using standard rotary M-B-B switches to operate the nixies and I have had no real problems with contact wear. The "minute" switch required a 10 way switch and for this I used a 30 way Painton Winkler switch wired in blocks of 3 to give the 10 ways. The "tens of minutes" used a 1 pole 12 way switch wired in blocks of 2. I did have to replace the latter switch about 30 years ago. The switches are driven by a 1 rpm motor using a spider arrangement similiar to your clock. I assume the nixies are GR10M (or their equivalents Z520M/ZM1020/GN4). The total current drawn by these is only about 9mA so there is no trouble with arcing. If Dekatron can't find the article, I think I should still have it but it would require a trip up into my loft! Peter |