|
General Vintage Technology Discussions For general discussions about vintage radio and other vintage electronics etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
24th Jun 2018, 7:59 am | #61 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,868
|
Re: Valve sound?
Quote:
I'd add that it applies to 'very good' amplifiers when not driven into clipping. If that happens, differences can become apparent. Musicians sometimes wish to do this as part of their performance and their amplifier becomes an extension of their effects pedals. It's worth noting that only a single instrument's output is passing through this treatment. Things would be very different if all the band's instruments were distorted together. This is the big divide between guitar (and Jon Lord's organ) amps and hifi ones. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
|
24th Jun 2018, 12:54 pm | #62 |
No Longer a Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 2,679
|
Re: Valve sound?
I have attached a pdf (as images of text don't do too well) It should be readable with a bit of zooming. It was Authored by Sidney Corderman Vice President of R&D at McIntosh Labs.
It appears to be as they were transitioning into transistor amps. It looks at differences in output transformer-less amps (OTL's) and transformer amps in transistor power amplifiers. A lot about getting max output power while still in the safe operating limits of the transistors (see fig 11 & 12). Also though some interesting points about McIntosh's low leakage reactance output transformers too. I'm sorry I do not know the publication origin or date, it is a photocopy from my archives. |
24th Jun 2018, 1:59 pm | #63 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,431
|
Re: Valve sound?
There is a footnote re the FTC Nov 1974 regulations so it must be later than that. According to Wikipedia the MC2500 was introduced in 1980.
__________________
Frank |
24th Jun 2018, 2:14 pm | #64 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,868
|
Re: Valve sound?
1974 would be very late for even considering transformer coupled transistor amplifiers.
It's easy to think that as the amplifier output is going to wind up in magnetic form in the speaker anyway, so what is so evil in having an added trip to magnetism and back along the way? There are at least two issues with this consideration: The speaker's magnetic bit isn't within the feedback loop, so any accumulation of phase shift doesn't put a stability-imposed limitation on the feedback. Secondly, the chunky iron polepieces in the speaker are carrying the massive flux of the speaker's magnet, not that of the signal. (This is why the pole pieces don't need to be laminated to keep losses down) David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
24th Jun 2018, 2:20 pm | #65 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,431
|
Re: Valve sound?
I understand the article but I don’t have the knowledge to question it, I just noticed the date and found what appears to be the release date of one of the amplifiers noted in the article.
__________________
Frank |
24th Jun 2018, 5:44 pm | #66 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,311
|
Re: Valve sound?
Quote:
OK, this amp didn't compete with a Radford STA25, which measures hugely better in every respect and whose output stages only use four EL34s in total (interestingly both amps had near-identical small-signal and drive stages - the OTL designer had clearly learned from Bailey !). The Radford would definitely pass your 'sounds just like the transistor one' double-blind test. Cheers, GJ
__________________
http://www.ampregen.com |
|
24th Jun 2018, 8:20 pm | #67 | |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: Valve sound?
Quote:
|
|
24th Jun 2018, 9:13 pm | #68 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,868
|
Re: Valve sound?
It's very difficult to avoid distortion of one sort or another in the crossover region. I've always considered both a gap in between the areas covered by the source and sink transistors and the case of them overlapping as being crossover distortion. On the whole the overlap condition is nicer because at least you always have some Gm to provide influence over the output.
(16 PL519s in the output stage of a mono amp, similar to Futterman. I was out to equal what I'd done with transistors, peak current, bandwidth, distortion and all. The driver stages were cascoded and quite low impedance to get the bandwidth. Stage gains were somewhat restrained. Yes I did realise that if I'd decided to put it into production there would be a few idiots who'd have considered buying one, but I didn't want to deal with them. It was made to do a job. To prove to myself that I could engineer the valve sound out of an all valve [except rectifiers!] amplifier and to find out if anyone could hear the difference.) David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
24th Jun 2018, 9:42 pm | #69 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Worksop, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Posts: 5,553
|
Re: Valve sound?
Did Phillips not do an amp with a feedback sensor on the speaker cone itself a few years ago?
|
24th Jun 2018, 11:06 pm | #70 | |
No Longer a Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 2,679
|
Re: Valve sound?
Quote:
But in most reasonable grade Hi Fi amps (with BJT's) there is adjustable bias with a pot and a transistor Vbe multiplier arrangement and emitter resistors too, and the designers not shy to waste some quiescent power in the transistors and the resistors. Then the cross over distortion is not a major issue, that is, if its adjusted properly. The global negative feedback cleans up the gain related square law non linearity in the region of cross over. This is completely unlike peak clipping though, once that occurs, the feedback is effectively useless and cannot correct it. |
|
24th Jun 2018, 11:08 pm | #71 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,868
|
Re: Valve sound?
They did. Philips Motional Feedback loudspeaker.
It had an accelerometer on the cone of the bass driver. The bandwidth of this loop was limited to just equalising the bass output at the bottom end. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
24th Jun 2018, 11:21 pm | #72 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Derby, UK.
Posts: 7,735
|
Re: Valve sound?
The OTL valve amplifier certainly sounds like something that would be good for those long, cold winter nights ..... Under consumer law, you'd probably have to describe it as a space heater you can listen to music with, if you wanted to sell such a beast!
Gain is gain, irrespective whether it's being achieved by turning back some of the charge carriers in a stream, narrowing the pipe so only some of them can get through or attracting them towards yourself but they overshoot. Any "characteristic sound" associated with a particular technology really is just a consequence of its inherent deviations from the ideal; and once those imperfections are understood and dealt with, all you are left with is a faithful reproduction of the original sound. Which, as I've alluded to previously, turns out to be a lot less interesting than it sounds as though it should be. So if the destination is boring, then you might as well at least try to have an interesting journey -- hence some people opt to mountain-bike, pony-trek, hang-glide or run dressed as chickens. And there's a certain undeniable, sadistic pleasure to be taken in watching a grown adult run 26 miles through the streets in an ill-fitting costume, not because they're actually having fun -- which they quite evidently aren't -- but because they think that's what they are supposed to do.
__________________
If I have seen further than others, it is because I was standing on a pile of failed experiments. Last edited by julie_m; 24th Jun 2018 at 11:23 pm. Reason: Added context due to intervening posts |
24th Jun 2018, 11:54 pm | #73 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,311
|
Re: Valve sound?
Quote:
Cheers, GJ
__________________
http://www.ampregen.com |
|
25th Jun 2018, 12:43 am | #74 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Papamoa Beach, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
Posts: 2,944
|
Re: Valve sound?
Regarding the use of output transformers in transistor amplifiers, my understanding is that McIntosh did this with its first solid-state model, the MC2505 of 1967, and then continued the practice for quite a few years afterwards. But as far as I know, the transformer was used simply as an impedance matching device, and was outside of the main feedback loop. The attached block schematic for the later MC2205, attached, confirms this arrangement.
Cheers, |
25th Jun 2018, 12:49 am | #75 | |
No Longer a Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 2,679
|
Re: Valve sound?
Quote:
Last edited by Argus25; 25th Jun 2018 at 12:58 am. Reason: typo |
|
25th Jun 2018, 7:55 am | #76 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,311
|
Re: Valve sound?
Quad's first valve amplifier, the 50D (later revised to the 50E) also used an output transformer http://www.geocities.ws/ResearchTria...22/q50ecir.jpg. This allowed relatively easy choice of load matching and, in this case, was inside the feedback loop.
Cheers, GJ
__________________
http://www.ampregen.com |
25th Jun 2018, 1:00 pm | #77 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,868
|
Re: Valve sound?
First non-valve amplifier ?
Just trying to prove I'm awake and paying attention... David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
25th Jun 2018, 1:02 pm | #78 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,311
|
Re: Valve sound?
Yes (I clearly wasn't at 07:55 today ).
Cheers, GJ
__________________
http://www.ampregen.com |
25th Jun 2018, 9:17 pm | #79 | |
Octode
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 1,874
|
Re: Valve sound?
Quote:
Oh - and your point above about putting a whole band through the same non-linear transfer function made me smile and think how it is that Deep Purple songs don't contain so many jazz chords - Fm7b5 etc - the root and fifth being about all you can get away with with 'fuzz' before sum and difference inter-modulation products get seriously dissonant, and not in a good way |
|
25th Jun 2018, 10:28 pm | #80 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,868
|
Re: Valve sound?
There's a good minute of a Hammond C being distorted to hell and back at the beginning of the Machine Head version of 'Lazy' It's quite obvious that the fuzz is well pedalled back when he wants to play a chord. There's a whole lotta expression going on!
For jazz chords in rock, it has to be Rick Wright. There are some gorgeous key change sequences in Dark side of the moon, and as for Celestial Voices, Ah Now I've got to go listen to it. There's a Farfisa Compact Duo recreated version on youtube by nickhirst999 which is superb! David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |