|
Vintage Test Gear and Workshop Equipment For discussions about vintage test gear and workshop equipment such as coil winders. |
|
Thread Tools |
4th Dec 2016, 1:28 pm | #1 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
Found on the 'Net: original source unknown, probably QST.
Two aspects puzzle me: (a) the range switching, in particular the 'gain trimmers' arrangement: I would have expected separate pots. for each range and (b) there are 6 switchable ranges, yet only 4 shown on the meter scale. Finally, would anyone like to estimate the freq. range of this proposed instrument? Your thoughts & comments will be appreciated: thank you. Al. |
4th Dec 2016, 2:32 pm | #2 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cottingham, East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 5,737
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
As to the meter scale, to keep it uncluttered, as is commonplace, for the additional two scales not shown on the dial, the two top ranges would be maked on the switch x 10. Hence, the 0-30 RF Volts on the range switch would be read on the 0-3V range, so 30V would be FSD and 0-100 RF Volts on the range switch would be read on the 0-10V range. However, I wouldn't want to suggest that the diodes in the probe circuit or the transistors would stand that sort of Voltage, and couldn't say what frequency it would operate to. I assume that it's meant for tweaking homebrew QRP transmitter stages with just a few Volts of RF, up to say 30MHz.
Just my thoughts, for what they're worth.
__________________
David. BVWS Member. G-QRP Club member 1339. |
4th Dec 2016, 2:41 pm | #3 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 3,077
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
At first glance it looks like this meter uses a remote head for measurement with temperature compensating diodes.
The diode detector will operate up into the linear region on the top two scales on the dial so the ranges 4, 5 and 6 will probably be 10V, 30V and 100V. So you only need 4 scales for 6 ranges? I haven't checked the resistor dividers to see if this is the case though... The diode PIV rating will limit the voltage that can be measured without damage... The JFETs are drawn as N but I think they should be P. I would have expected to see three gain trimming pots. One for the bottom range (close to square law?) one for range two (transition region ?) and then one for the top ranges that will all be linear. I think that the diodes will limit the frequency range and I'd expect it to work OK over the HF range but the accuracy would begin to suffer in the VHF range. A modern version would use Schottky diodes (eg 1N5711) but these diodes have a lower PIV rating. But the probe would then work with a flat response up into the UHF region if the head was built with good RF layout etc. The temperature compensation would be (most) needed for the bottom two ranges.
__________________
Regards, Jeremy G0HZU Last edited by G0HZU_JMR; 4th Dec 2016 at 2:47 pm. |
4th Dec 2016, 2:44 pm | #4 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 3,077
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
Looks like I was writing my post at the same time as David
__________________
Regards, Jeremy G0HZU |
4th Dec 2016, 3:22 pm | #5 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,800
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
Freq range will depend on the construction of the head and probe. 1N914 suggests no more than HF. Could go lots higher with schottky diodes and careful construction.
If building, an opamp would be far better and the right one would make the offset adjustment unnecessary. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
4th Dec 2016, 4:50 pm | #6 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
1n270 (bitsbox/farnell) has PIV of 100v, 0.8pF capacitance and is good to 200MHz-ish. Also being Ge based the forward drop and linear region is closer to zero than an Si or Schottky diode.
I've built an RF voltmeter. I won't detail it here as the schematic is long lost so I will summarise that I decided to avoid all linearity problems by using a basic attenuator, then a FET follower (J113) followed by a switchable 40dB amplifier, followed only then by detector and then the meter driver. Peak is nearly always in the linear region and it doesn't load the circuit due to the FET follower. This drives a £2.68 DMM from CPC as a readout |
4th Dec 2016, 5:32 pm | #7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
Isn't there a chip that does all of this with a logarithmic scale (saves all that switching) up to a few hundred MHz?
|
4th Dec 2016, 7:11 pm | #9 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
Thank you, gentlemen. Good answers to all my questions. Plenty of things there for further thoughts.
Al. |
4th Dec 2016, 7:20 pm | #10 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
|
4th Dec 2016, 8:22 pm | #11 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,800
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
Try Analog Devices AD8357 500MHz 92dB dynamic range. £8 at farnell in singles. I use them rather a lot. Easy to use and very dependable. Much more expensive than a vanilla opamp and a diode, but a good price for what it does.
David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
4th Dec 2016, 8:33 pm | #12 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,924
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
Speaking of chips, attached is a Power Meter circuit from QST which seems to have attracted attention over the years, with a couple refinements being published subsequently. Wide range of input levels and good to 500MHz...apparently. Perhaps of interest?
B |
4th Dec 2016, 9:05 pm | #13 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
|
8th Dec 2016, 5:53 pm | #14 |
Diode
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 4
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
Hi, this circuit was published in 73 Magazine, Dec/1973 issue, with a full explanation for construction. I have built one, it works very fine until 150MHz.
I downloaded the magazine from the web, it's free. I dont have the link, try with Google. Happy new year. Ruben. |
9th Dec 2016, 1:03 pm | #15 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
Thank you, Ruben: your post refers to my opening post, q.v.: cct. of an R.F. voltmeter.
The article to which you refer is indeed in that issue of 73 magazine. It can be found here: http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A7x9U...dA6JoJwxjbJx4- I used the offered facility to download it as a .pdf file. There are many pages in that magazine issue, so it does take some searching to find it - but yes, it is there. Unlike in my OP, the '73 mag.' article goes into a lot of detail - which helps in not only fully understanding the cct. but also the construction of it. Then there is the fact that you state you have tried it with success: that accreditation is worth quite a lot. Thanks again - and a merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year to you. Al. Last edited by Skywave; 9th Dec 2016 at 1:15 pm. |
9th Dec 2016, 3:03 pm | #16 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 3,077
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
If the temperature compensation works well on the bottom (mV) range it might be worth making a series of external (Hi Z) attenuators for it because the bottom range looks like it will operate in square law. This means you could use it to measure the Vrms of various complex waveforms on this range and the attenuators would extend the range up for higher voltages than 20mV. On the upper ranges on the meter where the detector operates in the linear region you are kind of limited to measuring sine waves unless you can accept a fair bit of measurement uncertainty if there is much in the way of odd order harmonic distortion for example.
It might be worth having the zero control on the front panel if there is a bit of drift over temperature despite the temp comp that is already there. This could be useful on the bottom (mV) range.
__________________
Regards, Jeremy G0HZU |
9th Dec 2016, 11:45 pm | #17 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
I've now extracted the relevant pages from that magazine and stored them as .jpg files. If anyone needs a copy of them, please send me a P.M.
► Incidentally, there is a drawing error on the cct. diag. The two FETs, Q1 and Q2 are drawn as N-channel types. However, Q1 and Q2 are 2N4360, which are P-channel types. That is confirmed since the source of Q1 and Q2 are commoned and via R12 go to the +ve rail - which is chassis / earth. The drains of Q1 and Q2 eventually go to the -ve supply rail. OTOH, Q3 and Q4 - both NPN types - are drawn O.K.: their collectors (eventually) go to the +ve rail (chassis / earth); their emitters (eventually) go to the -ve supply rail. Al. |
10th Dec 2016, 2:57 pm | #18 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 3,077
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
Quote:
__________________
Regards, Jeremy G0HZU |
|
13th Dec 2016, 2:06 pm | #19 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
For those who are following this thread: an update.
On account of preparation for Christmas plus routine household tasks and chores, input to this thread from me has temporarily ceased. But now and again when time permits, 'behind the scenes', I am still investigating this circuit and others associated to it. It is my expectation and desire that when I have something useful to add to this thread, I will do so. Your patience is thus respectfully requested: thank you. Al. |
13th Dec 2016, 10:39 pm | #20 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
Re: R.F. voltmeter: your thoughts, please
An idea: is what follows sound?
For various reasons, it would be convenient to replace the two P-channel FETs with N-channel types. To do this, the following changes will need to be made: 1. Replace both FETs with N-channel types; R12 stays same value 2. The -9v. rail becomes + 9v. But all the 0v. / gnd. connections stay the same. 3. CR5 and CR6 stay in the same position in the circuit, but they are reversed (the cathodes become the anodes, and vice-versa); but R11 stays same value. 4. The four rectifying diodes, CR1 - CR4 similarly will need anode and cathode 'swop'. 5. Q3 and Q4 (NPN) are replaced by PNP types. And just as an after-thought, would replacing the FET's common source resistor, R12, with a constant-current sink, be worthwhile? I cannot think of any other changes that may be necessary. And there are no polarized capacitors to consider! Can anyone spot any flaws in my thinking and proposed changes here? Thanks, Al. |