|
General Vintage Technology Discussions For general discussions about vintage radio and other vintage electronics etc. |
|
Thread Tools |
16th Feb 2019, 2:51 pm | #21 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,311
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
Quote:
Cheers, GJ
__________________
http://www.ampregen.com Last edited by GrimJosef; 16th Feb 2019 at 3:20 pm. |
|
16th Feb 2019, 4:17 pm | #22 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,935
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
I think that the best discussions of the dual properties of light have been presented in one of the series made by Jim Al-Khalili. I think that he's very much the best 'presenter' of science we've had.
B
__________________
Saturn V had 6 million pounds of fuel. It would take thirty thousand strong men to lift it an inch. |
16th Feb 2019, 6:13 pm | #23 | |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
Quote:
|
|
16th Feb 2019, 7:53 pm | #24 | |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
Quote:
In a nut-shell, our human experiences are limited by our intrinsic senses. And perhaps that is just as well. Al. |
|
16th Feb 2019, 8:21 pm | #25 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,903
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
The moment a physicist decides that smugness is a physical attribute, he will have to invent a carrier particle, the smugon. And then the hunt will be on to find or create one.
The universe is, to our level of understanding, a rather strange place and much that goes on is counterintuitive to expectations learned from our direct observations at our natural scale of things. Physics is heavily engaged in modelling things at extreme scales and though the models certainly don't fit together ideally, the prediction of a further sort of particle and then subsequently finding it, predicting and finding gravity waves are evidence of some successes. The cutting edge of science isn't far away, it's inside every subatomic particle of every one of us and everything we see hear or touch. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
17th Feb 2019, 1:07 am | #26 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brentwood, Essex, UK.
Posts: 5,349
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
When I was putting my son to bed one night a couple of decades ago, (he was about 7 or 8 at the time) he asked me how radio waves travel through space. I told him that I didn't think anyone really knew. I said that there was something called Maxwell's equations that I had been taught at college that, if you energised a piece of wire of a certain length with a certain frequency, allowed you to calculate how much voltage would appear across a different wire of a certain length a certain distance away, and that this could be used to design radio and TV aerials. These equations worked, and were based on wave motion in a medium. To support this wave, physicists had come up with the concept of the aether that the waves were propagated in. Other physicists had made experiments that had proved that the aether did not exist, but had not addressed how, if it didn't exist, radio waves were propagated, and why Maxwell's equations worked. I also mentioned that some phenomena were explained by treating beams of light as balls of energy, and others by treating light as a wave, so no-one really knew what light was either.
I then said that, when I was at school, a teacher had observed that , in maths and physics, you occasionally came across things (like the value of Pi) which no-one knew exactly what they were. Specialists just gave them names and then everyone else thought that the specialists knew what they were. He was satisfied with that. |
18th Feb 2019, 12:57 pm | #27 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
We know what Pi is; we just cannot write it down in a finite number of digits in any number system. This is not because we are ignorant, but because Pi is an irrational number. (Actually, it is worse than that: Pi is transcendental, so we can't even give a simple equation for Pi)
We only believed that waves needed a medium because all the waves we knew about before EM had a medium. We therefore jumped to the false conclusion that all waves need a medium. Drop that assumption and there is no need to 'explain' how EM waves can propagate without a medium. |
18th Feb 2019, 2:02 pm | #28 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,088
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
Agree about pi definitely!
Agree also about waves needing / not needing a medium. (In fact, if you subscribe to the corpuscular theory of light, then photons would travel quicker, faster, farther, with no medium to slow them down. But that's getting very simplistic!) |
18th Feb 2019, 3:01 pm | #29 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 14,010
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
I think quite a bit of 'general' comprehension of things is compromised by simplistic analogy - I remember getting horribly confused by the various motor/generator/electromagnetism right/left-hand-rules at school because part way through the Physics O-level course the books we were using switched from using 'conventional current' to 'electron flow'!
The 'holes' concept used to explain simple semiconductor electronics also confused me deeply. Now, where did I put my bottle of Phlogiston? |
18th Feb 2019, 3:13 pm | #30 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Folkestone, Kent, UK.
Posts: 2,172
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
Quote:
|
|
18th Feb 2019, 5:34 pm | #31 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
As EM appears to be fundamental it perhaps cannot be explained in terms of anything simpler. If so, a lack of explanation is not due to lack of knowledge but is a way of expressing the knowledge that it is fundamental. Some people always search for the underlying cogs and wheels, but what if they don't exist? If there were cogs we would have to decide whether they were fundamental and so in no need of explanation.
|
18th Feb 2019, 6:18 pm | #32 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,903
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
But there might be something there... we just need the funding for the new 17 peta-electron-volt Zappatron to find out. Only lack of results from infinite effort will prove that there is nothing more. Something being fundamental is very difficult to prove.
David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
18th Feb 2019, 6:26 pm | #33 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
Probably impossible to prove. However, at present electrons, photons etc. appear to have no structure so they seem not to be made of anything else.
|
18th Feb 2019, 7:01 pm | #34 | ||
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,088
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
Quote:
I don't know if there was a few years (1940's - 50's) where an attempt was made to have currents move in the direction of electrons - and it failed? Quote:
John Dalton had the plum-pudding, uniformly constructed atom; Dave you've got your plum-pudding photon! And the plum-pudding electron is soaked with a spoonful of charge. Easy! |
||
18th Feb 2019, 8:30 pm | #35 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Cumbria (CA13), UK
Posts: 6,130
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
When I was at school, being the rebel that I was, I risked the wrath of the physics teachers by refusing to use "conventional current" - for much the same reason as kalee20 describes. It seemed to make no sense in the context of thermionics. After all, how could heating a cathode of a valve cause "current" to travel from the anode to the cathode. At least I managed to pass my physics "O" level with a respectable grade and managed a pass at "A" level, so I don't know whether I was docked any points if I used electron flow in any electronics questions.
__________________
Mending is better than Ending (cf Brave New World by Aldous Huxley) |
19th Feb 2019, 12:59 pm | #36 |
Triode
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Settle, North Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 49
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
Electrons are fundamental particles ie they are not made of any other bits. Unlike other particles such as protons and neutrons (and lots of other particles called Mesons) which are made up of Quarks. Don't get me started on Strangeness and Charm. Suffice to say that Particle Physics and Quantum Physics is a different world altogether where the rules are very complicated. As for conventional current, it was originally thought that it was the positive charges that moved, but later it was discovered that it was really the electrons. However, we stayed with the conventional current even though we know technically it is incorrect.
|
19th Feb 2019, 1:05 pm | #37 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
Those who find holes and conventional current difficult to swallow may be interested to know that Paul Dirac predicted the positron when he found negative energy solutions for his new theory of electrons. In essence, he said that a positron is a negative energy electron state which happens not to have an electron in it - very much like a hole in a semiconductor. Nowadays positrons are also sometimes thought of as an electron going backwards in time - unconventional current?
|
19th Feb 2019, 2:29 pm | #38 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,311
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
I understood that the assignation of positive and negative to the charges of the fundamental particles was due, at least in part, to a simple error made by Zeeman in the experimental investigation of the effect which carries his name https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeeman_effect.
I remember actually doing the experiment on my undergraduate physics course. Completing it successfully gained you a credit of 12 hours towards the course 'practical' requirement. It was infamous for taking either 6 hours, if no-one had laid a finger on the Fabry-Perot etalon since the previous week's students had finished, or 18 hours if they had - the thing was such a nightmare to line up and keep stable. Anyway, the point of the experiment was to determine the polarisation of the light emitted in the Zeeman-split components. Based on that and a knowledge of the direction of the applied magnetic field, you could in theory work out whether, in a planetary model of the atom, the heavy bit in the middle (nucleus) and the much lighter orbiting bits (electrons) were positive and negative respectively, or vice versa. In practice the polarisation preparation and analysis set-up was a fiendish combination of waveplates and retarders, all of which had their own directions to take into account. Get just one of them wrong and the answer would be wrong too. Poor Zeeman did. So his original publication ended up declaring the electrons to be positive. The following issue of the journal included an embarrassed correction. Cheers, GJ
__________________
http://www.ampregen.com |
20th Feb 2019, 1:12 pm | #39 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 2,495
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
This may interest:
If our eyes were sensitive to radio waves instead of light waves then the sky would seem very different. The Sun would be a dim object - with just occasional bursts of activity - likewise nearly all of the stars and planets would fade away from sight. Instead our galaxy would appear as a glow across the sky, with the two brightest objects being 1) the remnants of a Supernova explosion (called Cass A) in our galaxy and 2) An active galaxy that is millions of light years away (called Cyg A). The amounts of energy being radiated by these objects make anything we do on the Earth look rather puny... Last edited by SteveCG; 20th Feb 2019 at 1:13 pm. Reason: correction |
20th Feb 2019, 1:45 pm | #40 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,088
|
Re: The electromagnetic spectrum
But it set me thinking, what would an electric "light" be like? Probably the business end could be a coil of wire, with AC going through it. Not a lot different to now, really!
|