|
Homebrew Equipment A place to show, design and discuss the weird and wonderful electronic creations from the hands of individual members. |
|
Thread Tools |
5th Feb 2009, 6:27 pm | #1 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,864
|
Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
First of all, I do hope that this topic is not considered too OT for this forum. My sincere apologies if it is. If, as I suspect, it is just borderline, I would be very grateful if it could be allowed to stay for a few days.
I have recently acquired a home-built 1930s electric clock. Not the usual mains-driven synchronous sort, but a battery-operated design based on the "Hipp Toggle". Essentially, when the pendulum's amplitude of swing becomes too small, a switch operates momentarily, putting a pulse of current through an solenoid on the pendulum's bob, which gives the pendulum a little "kick" to get it swinging more vigorously. This happens every half minute or so. Sadly, both I and the previous owner/repairer have struggled to get things going the way they were designed. It seems impossible to get it to run accurately, in spite of many hours of tinkering. The problem is that the amplitude of swing varies too much. The Hipp contact only closes when the swing becomes too small to advance the train, and then the solenoid gives it such a boost that the first wheel is advanced twice for the subsequent few swings (it’s driven by a ratchet and pawl arrangement). So I'd like to cheat, in such a way that the original design can be easily re-instated of course. My idea is simply to pass a pulse of current through the pendulum’s solenoid every two seconds, to keep it swinging with constant amplitude, and leave the Hipp toggle's contacts completely out of circuit. The solenoid has a resistance of about 200 ohms, and momentarily passing about 25-50mA through it (i.e. with about 5-10V) seems enough to keep it swinging.So what I need is a source of 0.5Hz pulses, a few volts in amplitude at a few tens of mA. I thought I could use the PCB from a modern battery-operated quartz movement as a convenient source of accurate 1Hz pulses (at about 0.5V) to trigger the circuit. So I suppose I need a divide-by two circuit and then some kind of “output stage”. Any ideas, anyone? Cheers, Nick. |
5th Feb 2009, 6:37 pm | #2 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Lake District, Cumbria (CA20) - UK
Posts: 2,136
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Nick,
You need something very basic. How about a small transformer 6 volt primary for example. Use a half wave rectifier and the result is 100Hz. Then all you might need is a simple pulse shaping circuit, perhaps a Schmitt trigger or even a good old fashioned relay. Regards,
__________________
Brian |
5th Feb 2009, 6:43 pm | #3 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,864
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Thanks for your reply, Brian!
But I have to admit that I'm confused - circuit design is not my forte How do I get 0.5Hz I need from the mains-derived 100Hz? Thanks, Nick. |
5th Feb 2009, 6:45 pm | #4 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Lake District, Cumbria (CA20) - UK
Posts: 2,136
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Sorry Nick,
I was working in metric minutes (they have 50 seconds) the cold has addled my brain. I'd still keep it simple. Use a simple CR circuit to operate the aforementioned relay. I used to run several "Pulsynetic" clocks from a small motor with a cam operating a microswitch and that gave pretty good results. Regards,
__________________
Brian |
5th Feb 2009, 6:46 pm | #5 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,311
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
The only thing you haven't said Nick, explicitly at least, is how long you want the output pulses to be. Are they meant to be "high" for 1 sec then "low" for 1 sec or do you just want a "short" pulse every couple of seconds ?
Depending on the answer you'll then need just a CMOS flip-flop (cheap as chips) followed by a transistor to handle the current and probably an input transistor to amplify the 0.5V trigger pulses. That'd give you 50% duty cycle. If you want shorter pulses you'll probably need to use the other flip-flop in the package to shorten the output. Cheers, GJ |
5th Feb 2009, 6:59 pm | #6 |
Octode
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Southport, Merseyside, UK.
Posts: 1,156
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Won't the 555 timer IC do for an application like this? Just been looking in the Radio Shack booklet and they got a Metronome and a Pulse Generator circuit, besides various other oscillators.
John |
5th Feb 2009, 7:07 pm | #7 | ||
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,864
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Hi, GJ!
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks, Nick. |
||
5th Feb 2009, 7:11 pm | #8 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,864
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Hi John,
Yes, I thought "555" to start with too, they're very versatile things. But accuracy wouldn't be good enough for running a clock - unless I used one to provide the pulse, and manually triggered it from my 1Hz quartz signal via a divide-by-two arrangement. Nick. |
5th Feb 2009, 7:33 pm | #9 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,967
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
A simple R-C controlled multivibrator can be quite accurate, though it needs to be adjusted to run at the right speed just like a mechanical clock. Lots of battery clocks used this arrangement before the widespread adoption of crystal control.
If you build one with two transistors rather than using a 555, you can put the solenoid in one of the collector lines and can dispense with a driver transistor. It would be very easy to knock something together and experiment. http://www.hobbyprojects.com/multivi...s/astable.html Paul |
5th Feb 2009, 7:46 pm | #10 |
Nonode
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 2,573
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Trying to adjust a low frequency RC oscillator can be a very frustrating and time consuming exercise. A better solution might be to use a divider such as the CMOS 4060 which has a 14 stage binary divider. This has a section which can be used as an oscillator which can be run at 8.192kHz. The output of the final divider would be 0.5Hz. This can be used to trigger a 555 configured as a monostable to give a short pulse for the solenoid.
Keith |
5th Feb 2009, 8:01 pm | #11 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
A 4060 and a standard 32768Hz watch crystal will give you 2Hz. Another 4060, partially used will give 0.5Hz square wave. Alternatively the 2 halves of a 4013, part of a 4040 etc etc will do the divide by 4. This will run on anything from 3V to 15V. Then a single transistor circuit with a couple of Rs and a C to differentiate the square wave to get a pulse. Or maybe a 4098 monostable.
I can probably give you a selection of these chips from stock. Data on 4000 series CMOS should be readily available on line. |
6th Feb 2009, 7:48 am | #12 | |
Tetrode
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Walton on the Naze Essex Uk
Posts: 91
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
I'm so out of practice that I may be missing the point entirely, but isn't the aim to get the pendulum to do the timing?
I'm assuming that it is operating as a true pendulum. Quote:
I know you mentioned the ability to change back to the original design, but even trying to 'push the time into the pendulum' in the short term, seems counter (Groan) to the aims of a restorer...furthermore, wouldn't there be an issue of the energy being applied not having any feedback? Frivolous mode: On (But it says what I'm trying to get at.) Ah, I have it! You could fit micro switches onto the sides of the case that would cut the power for a few seconds if the pendulum's stride got too great. I'm full of bright ideas at one in the morning. Last edited by Top Anode; 6th Feb 2009 at 7:54 am. |
|
6th Feb 2009, 9:49 am | #13 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,289
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
It will also be necessary to make sure that the pulse occurs at the correct time ie when the pendulum comes close to the electromagnet.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
6th Feb 2009, 10:04 am | #14 | |||||
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Near Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 4,609
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Hi Nick
I've only just spotted this thread - a few thoughts about the various replies and a few solutions - especially the last paragraph: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
A non-crystal controlled like a 555 would not be accurate at all. A 32768 Hz Xtal could be divided down with bistables from the CMOS or TTL chips, or even transistors. As in the frequency dividers on an electronic organ. However, you don;t really need any of that. Far too complicated. You only need an impulse every 30 seconds or less to keep the pendulum maintained, not every half-second. This could be done by an optocoupler and the seconds hand on a cheap quartz clock. The impulse needs to be very short - exactly how short depends on the mechanical construction. Finally, and this is the real problem that no-one has spotted yet: Quote:
There are two possible reasons for this, neither of them electronic.
HTH
__________________
Mike. |
|||||
6th Feb 2009, 11:34 pm | #15 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ellesmere, Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 188
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Hello Nick,
On the face of it, the solenoid is overpowerful - would it be adequate to reduce the current through the solenoid? Lower the supply voltage or insert a series resistance? Regards Ant |
7th Feb 2009, 9:15 am | #16 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Seaford, East Sussex, UK.
Posts: 5,997
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
I think I would stick to trying to solve it mechanically. My suggestions are:
Dirty contacts in the switch means too much hysterisis resulting in the extra long pulse when it does finally make. I guess you have tried cleaning the switch, can you fit something else? Modern alkaline batteries have low resistance, try a series resistor to reduce the current? Put a stop in to take out the excess momentum in the pendulum, perhaps a bit of spring steel? |
7th Feb 2009, 9:42 am | #17 | ||
Tetrode
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Walton on the Naze Essex Uk
Posts: 91
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Okay, no jokes. Mike says:
Quote:
My statement: I'm assuming that it is operating as a true pendulum. Quote:
EDIT: Perhaps I should. My interpretation of the first post is that it's wished to get the clock going, abandoning the "Hipp Toggle", but allowing the old tech method to be recoverable if so desired. This would leave the question of the pendulum. If it's still going, then by my argument, it would not be a true pendulum, more an interesting visual feature. I was simply trying to make quite sure that the pendulum was the fundamental source of the timing. I did this because I was confused. How could firing a pulse at a timed interval, be integrated with the natural physical laws of a pendulum? Accurate enough, yes, but it would have to stay in phase for days. Very tall order, unless there is a feedback from a pendulum position sensor. The thinnest wisp of wire would trigger a 555 for instance. But this all seems to be spoiling what is a rather interesting machine. This toggle I see was in use for 'over one-hundred years'...please keep it original. If there is to be no feedback, then as I see it, the pendulum simply has to be given energy to overcome aerodynamic and mechanical friction, and also the more esoteric disturbances of the Earth's gravitational anomalies and perturbations. As far as I can see, this energy input has to be applied in a manner that will not alter the pendulum's timing, or the charm of the timepiece will be lost. |
||
7th Feb 2009, 9:53 am | #18 | ||
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Near Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 4,609
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Absolutely!
Quote:
Quote:
I still maintain the poor timekeeping is purely due to the fact that the count wheel is sometimes missing a tooth, sometimes catching two teeth. That cannot work properly! Nick - have you watched how often the contacts operate (how many swings) over a period? I made a similar Hipp-derived clock that runs on three HP2 batteries; with new batteries it takes about 8 swings to impulse, then for the next six months settles down to 6. As the batteries go down to less than a volt, it will stop after a few weeks whan the impulses get to every other swing. Timekeeping is a minute or two a week.
__________________
Mike. |
||
7th Feb 2009, 10:38 am | #19 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 638
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
This problem sounds familiar!
I have a similar problem with a partially built clock, which seems to work in a similar way to Nicks. It has a one second pendulum and the clock mechanism relay needs a pulse every 30 seconds. I did maintain the pendulum momentum initially by just using the relay contacts in a sort of mechanical bi-stable. This meant that the pendulum was energised at every swing. Not how it's supposed to work, but the pendulum kept going for the 24 hours that I trialled it. My next idea was to use opto techniques to sense the pendulum swings, count these up and every thirty seconds, send a pulse to the clock mechanism and also energise the bit that gives the pendulum a kick so that the pendulum momentum is retained and also resets the mechanism.The pendulum weight is a huge lump of lead encased in brass. There are two bits to the pendulum control, one relay energises and drops the weight onto the brass bit on the pendulum and the other relay resets it all. I don't see any reason why the clock bit cannot be used being driven from a modern xtal controlled osc with some arrangement to operate the pendulum control relays. I have pictured my clock bits below. The pendulum is not shown because the threads holding the weight onto the end of the pendulum shaft require renewing. |
7th Feb 2009, 10:50 am | #20 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,311
|
Re: Help wanted designing a source of 0.5Hz pulses, please
Quote:
I agree with Mike. In principle if this thing ever worked then it can be made to work again. However this may involve re-making worn mechanical parts. If it's just a few, if they don't need specialist tools to make them and set them up and if you're "good with your hands" (unlike me) then this would be the way to go. But if any of these is not the case then you may do more harm than good and the electronic fix should at least be completely reversible when someone with the necessary tools/time/expertise to fix the mechanics comes along. Cheers, GJ |
|