|
Hints, Tips and Solutions (Do NOT post requests for help here) If you have any useful general hints and tips for vintage technology repair and restoration, please share them here. PLEASE DO NOT POST REQUESTS FOR HELP HERE! |
|
Thread Tools |
11th Aug 2006, 11:35 pm | #1 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Blackpool, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 4,061
|
Decca TP85 transistor problems.
I've today revived an ex carboot Decca TP85 which needed a replacement for TR5 which is an AF116 ( as are TR3 and 4 ).
Problem was, this transistor needs long legs to pass through a narrow gap between two capacitors, otherwise the transistor can fouls the caps and the legs won't reach to the pcb. The only transistor I could find with long enough legs was an AF115. I fitted this and the radio now works fine. I was wondering, will it cause any problems running the radio with AF116-AF116-AF115 instead of the correct three AF116s ? or should I replace all three with the same coded transistors ? ( At present I have no better ones such as AF125/7 etc to use ). Having fitted the AF115 I did find it necessary to tweak the alignment a little but that may have been needed anyway, transistor swap or not. As an aside, the radio showed a non related additional fault. There was an uneven rumbling at the 'speaker and a horrible feedback-type howl with volume set roughly above midway. I eventually traced this to a duff OC71. I've not come across that fault before now |
12th Aug 2006, 11:44 pm | #2 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Harlaxton, Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 3,944
|
Re: Decca TP85
The AF115 and AF116 have very similar characteristics, the main difference being in frequency response. The AF115 is able to handle signals up to around 100 MHz but the AF116 although fine at 10.7 MHz would be poor at much higher frequencies.
I would guess that in the manufacturing process they started life as the same transistor and were then labelled after their parameters had been measured. As you have found the AF115 works fine in place of an AF116 but if you had wanted to replace an AF115 with an AF116 you probably would have had a problem as the AF116 would not have been able to handle the higher frequencies. |
13th Aug 2006, 12:18 am | #3 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Blackpool, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 4,061
|
Re: Decca TP85
Thanks for that Colin, I'll leave the radio as it is then
|
13th Aug 2006, 11:00 am | #4 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 1966-1976 Coverack in Cornwall and Helston Cornwall. 1976-present Bristol/Bath area.
Posts: 2,965
|
Re: Decca TP85
Hi Darren
As Colin said the AF115 was designed to work on the higher frequiencies notably those used in television IF stages. We came across these in the early hybrid and all transistorised tv sets dating back to the mid 1960's. Strangely enough despite the higher temeperatures and voltages they were reliable so perhaps you may have fitted a more reliable replacement.
__________________
Simon BVWS member |
14th Aug 2006, 11:10 am | #5 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hexham, Northumberland, UK.
Posts: 2,234
|
Re: Decca TP85
Sounds like a microphonic OC71 Darren. I have come across light sensitive ones before if the paint gets damaged. Can cause a buzz if working under fluorescent light with the transistor exposed. Guess who found this out after wasting a lot of time trying to find a strange fault.
Biggles. |
14th Aug 2006, 5:41 pm | #6 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Blackpool, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 4,061
|
Re: Decca TP85
Quote:
No it wasn't damaged black paint as I checked it for that. All I know is changing the OC71 cured the problem |
|
15th Aug 2006, 8:59 pm | #7 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bradford on Avon, Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 3,310
|
Re: Decca TP85
Quote:
Just scrape the paint from an old one, pop some sleeving over it leaving the end of the sleeving proud of the transistor. Connect an ohmeter across the base and emitter. Then see what happens when the open end of the sleeving is covered and uncovered.
__________________
"Nothing is as dangerous as being too modern;one is apt to grow old fashioned quite suddenly." |
|
21st Sep 2007, 4:30 pm | #8 |
Nonode
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 2,533
|
Re: Decca TP85 transistor problems.
Mine on the bench today had a duff OC71(TR6) too.
Another point I noticed... on both trader sheet 1634 and the Newnes book entry, C71 (10μF) is shown connected the wrong way round. In fact the negative (not positive) side should be facing R52. Fortunately in the actual set, this was connected correctly. Steve
__________________
https://www.radiocraft.co.uk |
14th Oct 2007, 9:55 am | #9 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ripon, N.Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 782
|
Re: Decca TP85 transistor problems.
Re-microphonic Germanium transistors. Many years ago I came across the opposite of this, i.e. a transistor which produced sound. It was an unmarked Germanium one in a TO5 can and I was using it in a class A output stage. The output transformer somehow became disconnected but I found I could still hear sound coming from the transistor itself - presumably from some sort of piezoelectric/magnetostriction effect,
Jim |
19th Oct 2007, 12:43 pm | #10 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,287
|
Re: Decca TP85 transistor problems.
Quote:
I can remember buying OC71s etc in the mid 60's. They came in a Mullard logoed box about 3" x 1" by 1/4". A far cry from the bagfuls we get today.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
|
19th Oct 2007, 6:07 pm | #11 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 2,533
|
Re: Decca TP85 transistor problems.
Quote:
S
__________________
https://www.radiocraft.co.uk |
|
20th Oct 2007, 11:12 am | #12 |
Heptode
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ripon, N.Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 782
|
Re: Decca TP85 transistor problems.
If anyone wants a black-painted OC71 to scrape the paint off I have a few unmarked ones which make great OCP71s,
Jim |