UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > General Vintage Technology > Components and Circuits

Notices

Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th Sep 2019, 6:17 pm   #1
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,925
Default VFO TX/RX switching - frequency sideslipper?

I'm looking at building a classic "table-top" 25-Watt 80M AM transmitter - 807 or 6146 PA, pair-of-6L6 as the modulator and a Woden UM1.

I'm thinking of using a transistor VFO, something like the classic "synthetic rock" circuit.

While looking at the VFO design I had an idea.

Traditionally the VFO has been de-powered on receive to avoid any carrier-leakage desensitising the receiver (or causing an annoying heterodyne with stations you're trying to receive) but I've never liked this since it varies the amount of self-heating of rthe VFO and this can cause drift.

What came to me at about 00:15z today was to leave the VFO running all the time, but to include a PIN-diode-switched capacitor across the tuned-circuit and controlled by the TX/RX/mute line, so when on receive the PIN-diode is forward-biased and the additional capacitor comes into play, sideslipping the VFO a couple of hundred KHz away from the receive-frequency to somewhere it can't cause trouble.

On TX the PIN-diode is reverse-biased so the extra capacitor is isolated.

I don't see any reason why this wouldn't work - but I've never seen it mentioned in any of the usual ham-radio mags or handbooks, which to me means either the idea has been tried and it doesn't work, it works but someone's got a patent on it and some good lawyers, or nobody's thought of it before!

What think you, good people?
G6Tanuki is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 7:24 pm   #2
Bazz4CQJ
Dekatron
 
Bazz4CQJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,920
Default Re: VFO TX/RX switching - frequency sideslipper?

Quote:
Originally Posted by G6Tanuki View Post
I'm looking at building a classic "table-top" 25-Watt 80M AM transmitter - 807 or 6146 PA, pair-of-6L6 as the modulator and a Woden UM1.
Just below the surface, I suspect that very many of us want to build such a rig, or something very similar.

Sometime ago, I considered the possibility of allowing a receiver BFO (455kHz) to be continually powered, but using a varicap diode on it to pull it sufficiently off frequency so that it was effectively 'switched off'. On paper, it actually appeared possible to set up a circuit where the BFO was functionally tuned by the varicap when needed as a BFO, but then a separate switch put sufficient DC on it to push it "out of bounds".

I got as far as buying the varicaps.... and now it's somewhere on the to do list.

B
__________________
Saturn V had 6 million pounds of fuel. It would take thirty thousand strong men to lift it an inch.

Last edited by Bazz4CQJ; 18th Sep 2019 at 7:37 pm.
Bazz4CQJ is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 8:06 pm   #3
G6Tanuki
Dekatron
 
G6Tanuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,925
Default Re: VFO TX/RX switching - frequency sideslipper?

The idea of mixing the BFO and Rx LO to generate the Tx carrier is well-established [the 19-set used it]; equally the idea of using a common 450-470KHz "IF/SSB-generator" strip and filters in a transceiver with one VFO/LO.

Alas that idea won't work here because my 'default' HF receiver is a RA217D so there's no convenient "LO" related-to-transmitter-frequency source to be extracted-and-mixed... which is in a way a shame considering the efforts Racal went to in order to make their tunable LO so stable.
G6Tanuki is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 8:23 pm   #4
frsimen
Heptode
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Croydon, London, UK.
Posts: 760
Default Re: VFO TX/RX switching - frequency sideslipper?

That sideslipping idea works perfectly well. I have used it a number of times and I think the circuit featured in ARRL publications such as Solid State Design for the Radio Amateur.

From memory, I used 1N914 diodes for the switching.
frsimen is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2019, 9:17 pm   #5
Radio Wrangler
Moderator
 
Radio Wrangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,761
Default Re: VFO TX/RX switching - frequency sideslipper?

I think the RA217/1217 receivers use the same frequency plan as the RA117, and the MA79 exciter would work with that, so you could use the Rx VFO (for the 2-3 MHz tuneable IF) and either mix it with a crystal oscillator for your band or else build a reversed wadley converter.

G3ROO did a transceiver mod for the FRG7!

David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done
Radio Wrangler is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 4:24 am.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.