20th Sep 2021, 9:02 am | #61 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 14,007
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
What a great story about how AMS came to own Sinclair ..
I have always been just as interested in the business side of the electronic industry as the technology ,, stories about the entrepreneurs involved in making money from the technology always warm my heart .. |
20th Sep 2021, 10:45 am | #62 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
Quote:
Peter |
|
20th Sep 2021, 6:33 pm | #63 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brentwood, Essex, UK.
Posts: 5,349
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
Excellent read, thanks.
Sinclair did also file at least one patent application for a memory chip that would configure itself automatically to avoid any defective elements. It came across my desk when I was a patent examiner in the UK Patent Office examining semiconductor memory applications.By the time the file reached me it had been assigned to Anamartic via or Ternland (or possibly vice versa I can't now remember the order of the chain). I do remember the file did not contain the complete chain of assignment documents effecting the transfers of title and I had to ask for copies of the missing ones. Belatedly finding you don't own the copyright is unfortunately not uncommon. If you pay someone who is not an employee (such as a freelance consultant) to design something for you, then the copyright remains their property unless there is a written agreement to the contrary. We had an example of this when I was with GEC, where one of the subsidiary companies had a consultant make them something without getting an assignment first, and then they had to buy the rights from him at considerable expense in order to go into production. |
21st Sep 2021, 1:12 am | #64 |
Octode
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Knutsford, Cheshire, UK.
Posts: 1,500
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
Ouch! Must be careful with due processes in the legal world!
__________________
...where on earth did that spring/screw go?? |
21st Sep 2021, 10:03 am | #65 |
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Exeter, Devon and Poole, Dorset UK.
Posts: 6,879
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
Please stay on topic one post deleted.
__________________
Invisible airwaves crackle with life or at least they used to Mike T BVWS member. www.cossor.co.uk |
21st Sep 2021, 10:21 am | #66 |
Heptode
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Accrington, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 978
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
Had loads of his gear, but what I found good were his q16 speakers. very low power but they were so crisp. And the Sinclair IC12. Think it was based on the SN76013 ic. For what it was it was a nice sound, 6 watts but it was clean.
|
23rd Sep 2021, 9:53 pm | #67 |
Heptode
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Täby, Sweden
Posts: 709
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
1977 and the Sinclair Cambridge: 36 steps of programmable memory, but it was still possible to have a lunar lander program. For a 16 year old it was pure magic, and dictated the path of my life.
A dream maker. |
24th Sep 2021, 9:23 am | #68 |
Hexode
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cirencester, Gloucestershire, UK.
Posts: 391
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
I used Sinclair audio amplifiers back in the day.
You had to be careful with the over-Marketing of their output power. I reckoned about 3 "Sinclair" watts = 1 "normal" watt. |
24th Sep 2021, 10:17 am | #69 |
Pentode
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brackley Northamptonshire, UK.
Posts: 240
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
I made my then girlfriend, now my Wife, a Sinclair Calculator which she still has. Impressed with it, I made the Scientific. The good thing about that was no one else at work knew how to drive it with the Reverse Polish notation. I'm not sure what happened to that but in one of my component drawers is a solitary spare blue button for it. Later I made one of his amplifier modules which became part of my first home made TV. I still have a ZX81 and 16k RAM pack but was never a fan. I preferred the Tangerine Microtan. The ZX81 is however just the right shape for a door stop. It's good to recycle things.....
__________________
If you take something apart often enough, eventually you'll have two of them.... |
24th Sep 2021, 4:56 pm | #70 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Posts: 11,586
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
As anticipated in #57, Radio 4's 'Last Word' programme of 24th September 21 does have a spot about Sir Clive, with input from Jason Fitzpatrick from the Centre For Computing History and also from Chris Curry, the Sinclair colleague who went on to form Acorn.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000zv8y The Clive 'spot' is from about 14:20 minutes in to 21:55 minutes in, but as usual the whole programme is worth listening to. |
25th Sep 2021, 8:55 am | #71 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Wales, UK.
Posts: 6,927
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
The link in post 60 is fascinating and puts into sharp focus the difference between the amiable boffin and the ruthless entrepeneur.
Judging by the posts in this thread, many of us remember with affection our first calculator, ZX, Microvision or Spectrum. I wonder how many of us even remember the £139 Amstrad Sinclair, let alone with affection? Perhaps I'm wrong. When Mr Sugar dies, maybe this forum will be packed with fond reminiscences of the AVS systems, unopenable tower music centres or perhaps the CTV2200. Perhaps. |
25th Sep 2021, 9:11 pm | #72 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland and Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,681
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
Quote:
As a snobbish technically-minded teenager at the time, of course I turned my nose up at the Amstrad/Sinclair computers. But looking back, the computers marked a real change for Amstrad. While the tower systems and TVs were unashamedly cheap and simple dressed up to look like something they weren't, the computers were the opposite. They were affordable machines that turned out to be capable, reliable (if you can excuse the hard card issues in the later PC1640 et al) and practical, and were wildly popular as a result. I think we have Lord Sugar to thank for a reasonably happy ending to the Sinclair computing story, which could have been so much worse for all involved, including the hobbyists and users like me. Chris
__________________
What's going on in the workshop? http://martin-jones.com/ |
|
26th Sep 2021, 4:08 pm | #73 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kington, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 3,675
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
When old man Munns decided he needed some amplifiers to replace the worn out Philips 3312s stuck in pause which powered the booths in the record shop he owned and where I was Saturday/holidays lad, I built him three stereo jobbies around the IC12. They lasted until he sold up a decade later.
|
28th Sep 2021, 7:33 pm | #74 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Edinburgh, UK.
Posts: 3,274
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
|
28th Sep 2021, 8:22 pm | #75 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
I did meet Nigel Searle (of the link posted in #74) once while at Sinclair, only at lunch, devastatingly clever. As a middle twenties engineer I thought I knew a lot, how wrong I was. Being sourounded by such people realy bucked my ideas up, if that was the only thing I learnt at Sinclair it was worth it.
|
28th Sep 2021, 8:45 pm | #76 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, UK.
Posts: 11,586
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
Quote:
On the Spectrum +2, Amstrad's trademark integral tape deck robbed us of the (often necessary) ability to fiddle with the loading volumes, but the thing which most offended me was the decision to replace the 48K mode power on prompt "<Copyright Symbol> Sinclair 1982" with "Amstrad 1986". That vain and wholly unnecessary change actually broke a few 'legacy' tape protection schemes which reconstructed the code as it loaded from tape by mathematically manipulating it against the original Sinclair 48K ROM content. I wasn't impressed. The (Original) Sinclair Spectrum 128, often called the 'Toastrack', is the machine I would prefer to have now, but for some reason I didn't get one of those when they were originally around. Both Sinclair and Amstrad's version of the 128 have useful features - RGB video out, and a dedicated three note channel + 1 noise channel sound chip with output through the TV - still quite primitive, but a lot better than the ghastly beeper on the original Spectrum. There have been one, maybe two recent posts where people have bought old Amstrad tower audio systems purely on the back of their having been the first 'hifi' they ever owned, so maybe it will come to pass that people will have a degree of fondness for all things Amstrad at some point in the future. There already is a sizeable Amstrad CPC computer 'scene' but there I would say the love is for the computers, which were actually quite decent, rather than their manufacturer, whereas with the Sinclair scene the fondness for the gadgets and for their creator is all bound up into one. Last edited by SiriusHardware; 28th Sep 2021 at 9:01 pm. |
|
29th Sep 2021, 4:17 pm | #77 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 18,725
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
Quote:
The cameras didn't linger on it though, because the large silver volume knob was missing.
__________________
-- Graham. G3ZVT |
|
29th Sep 2021, 7:53 pm | #78 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 14,007
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
I never really fell into Sir Clive's nasty unreliable home-computers with their typing-on-cold-liver keyboards and under-heatsinked voltage-regulators that would shut down after you'd spent 45 minutes typing-in hexcodes from a magazine article.... though their heritage extended into the Amstrad PCW series of 'integrated' word-processors which brought desktop-publishing to the masses, and by way of terminal-emulation software let loads of students engage in 1990s bulletin-board chats with their friends.
[BT 'surftime' and university-halls-of-residence deploying otherwise-obsolete CAMTEC PADs helped here].;. Though it has to be said that the LocoScript and the Amstrad PCW entirely killed-off the historic "thesis-typer-upper" second-income stream for people in University/College-towns. |
29th Sep 2021, 8:49 pm | #79 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Dukinfield, Cheshire, UK.
Posts: 2,038
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
Quote:
Our shop sold the Spectrum for a short period and we did get a fair number of returns, but almost all of them turned out to be working perfectly. Most failures seemed to be down to the inability of the customer to tune their TV into the Speccy's output signal!
__________________
Andy G1HBE. |
|
29th Sep 2021, 10:02 pm | #80 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Portland, Dorset, UK.
Posts: 874
|
Re: Sir Clive Sinclair. R.I.P.
Same thing happened to my Step-Mum who had brought an Apricot computer and would type up letters and such-like for people/businesses who wanted something that looked more professional but once businesses could buy a PCW they could do it themselves and she lost an income stream, lucky that PPI ended up paying off the Apricot and later on she did have an Amstrad PC1512/1640 that we acquired much later on.
|