![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Television Standards Converters, Modulators etc Standards converters, modulators anything else for providing signals to vintage televisions. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 61
|
![]()
Noticed a few of you have had problems with this converter in previous (now closed) threads, what does the lack of shielding and/or inclusion of modulator in the box cause, interference on picture? The fault I get is frame collapse especially on peak white, but sometimes on the entire signal, I can only assume it is an alignment or input level problem? Having said that, when stable I think the Pineapple gives the best pic of all the converters I've had so far.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Octode
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Newbury, Berkshire, UK.
Posts: 1,770
|
![]()
Hi Derek
Welcome to the forum ![]() I had no end of problems with interaction between my modulator and Pineapple standards converter, such that I ended up putting them them in separate boxes. I don't think interference is likely to cause complete frame collapse, or anything as dramatic as that. In my case I got a diagonal noise pattern across the picture. Your problem sounds more like an intermittent solder joint to me ![]()
__________________
Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
![]()
Welcome to the forum.
The Pineapple converter is an extremely potent source of interference. It really needs to be in a metal box with metal shell connectors. From memory, it suffers from some some slight random noise effects near black level but these are not really visible on pictures. Also from memory the pictures are a bit sharper than a Domino because it used a higher sampling rate. The vertical interpolation on the Pineapple uses a novel and economical scheme which is not quite as accurate as the Domino and definitely not as good as the Aurora. Again this is hardly going to be visible on most pictures. Chris's (Evingar) diagnosis of your fault is sensible. I note you are in Newcastle which makes you local to Fernseh (Aka David Boynes) who is one of the UK's foremost 405 enthusiasts. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Walsham, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 516
|
![]()
Hi i have two of these and have no problems with interference one of my converters has a two modulators in the same box although there is an ally screen between them so i may be cheating the modulators are the american ones. the other converter is in separate boxes and im using the
one from the television mag this is vary good and has more output !. is your problem due to the converter or an intermitent fault on your tv? have you the same problem on diffrent sets. Danny |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 61
|
![]()
Thanks for all the replies and welcomings, as a new member I was just going to sit back and take in all the amazing info for a few weeks first but just couldn't resist posting am afraid! Actually I would say the unit is well shielded, it is in a early metal modem type box, there is a modulator in the same box, but I use it with an external one anyway. Yes I have noticed the problem on different sets, come to think of it though, this unit was assembled for me from parts and never properly aligned, I do not have the necessary knowledge to do it. (any ideas who might or if it is a user possible adjustment?) This probably explains the problems, sorry I should have remembered that before, but as I say, sometimes it is perfectly OK. Yes I am impressed so far with the Aurora, I just haven't had it long enough or used it with enough different sets to know for certain. I know of David B and have met him once, but it is Ed Dinning who I know best and who has helped me with a lot of things in the past, and as someone who had no background in TV or electronics I am most grateful.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 61
|
![]()
I've since experimented more and have found out something, the converter's behaviour is indeed very dependent on the input signal, specifically from a DVD player. I tried two different DVDs (both Region 2 PAL), one converted flawlessly through the Pineapple, the other caused collapse throughout! Can the output of DVDs be so different? Has anyone else noticed this, or that the Pineapple is very sensitive to the type of input? I've used both DVDs through the Aurora with no problems. (albeit on a different DVD player)
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
![]()
I'm wondering if there's a problem with Macrovision. Amongst other things this puts some super-white pulses in the field blanking. It is present on the output of some DVD players and its presence may depend on the disc being played. The object is to stop DVDs being copied.
Macrovision may upset the Pineapple though I have no means of proving this since I don't have a Pineapple. AFAIK the Aurora is immune to Macrovision though I have not done any tests. If you have a 'scope you can look in the field blanking for evidence of Macrovision. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Octode
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Borough of Gateshead, UK.
Posts: 1,420
|
![]()
Hi Derek,
You mentioned problems with DVD playback. I have a Dinosaur converter myself and find Macrovision copy protected DVDs replay with hooking at the top of the picture. All other DVDs playback perfectly. I wonder if this is significant to your problem? Cheers, Brian R |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Solingen, Germany
Posts: 727
|
![]()
Good morning,
I had a look at the schematic. From my UVB I know that the macrovision pulses are present at pin 1 of the LM1881 (comp. sync out)! I am sure a monostable connected to this output will solve the problems. BTW it is difficult to find a DVD with macrovision. I bought several DVDs and no macrovision, grrr. A friend sent me Independance Day, this one has macrovision. Kind regards, Darius |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 61
|
![]()
Hi sorry have been away over weekend, thanks for the helpful replies, this seems very likely, and suggests the Pineapple is OK after all, at least in this situation, I will make a note of which DVDs perform like that. Would just like to point out I am using DVDs to watch compilations of monochrome TV programmes, no colour films or anything you understand
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 61
|
![]()
What I can tell you so far is that the DVDs that have the symbol like a 'No Entry' sign on the packaging saying copy protected DO convert through the Pineapple, whereas those with the black triangle with 'CP' on it DO NOT convert properly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK.
Posts: 8,016
|
![]()
Hi Derek, you are now up to a Triode. Its all down to your number of posts.
Ed |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North East
Posts: 61
|
![]()
Thanks Ed,
I guessed it must be something like that, just couldn't find it on the site anywhere ![]() |
![]() |