|
Hints, Tips and Solutions (Do NOT post requests for help here) If you have any useful general hints and tips for vintage technology repair and restoration, please share them here. PLEASE DO NOT POST REQUESTS FOR HELP HERE! |
|
Thread Tools |
8th Mar 2006, 2:48 pm | #1 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Posts: 281
|
Fighting VHF interference with a DIY balun.
I live in a tall building, quite literally within sight of some of the local FM transmitter sites. A few, quick tests quickly revealed that A) five of the unwanted stations could be picked up with no antenna connected at all, and B) the rest was picked up along the outside of the 10 metre antenna cable to the wall socket. Even though the signal on the cable network is very strong, it still didn't prevent what sounded like distortion on some of the stations due to low level interference picked up by the long 'cable antenna'. With the cable connected directly to the radio, cable shield to radio chassis and inner conductor simply to one of the balanced VHF inputs, I could identify at least 28 different stations between 87 and 101MHz. Unfortunately there are only supposed to be 18 channels on the network within that range... Baluns have been discussed here in the forum before, and it is probably well known that one of the advantages of using a 75:300 ohm balun at the antenna socket is that proper impedance transformation will significantly increase the signal strength from the cable network. However the other important property of a properly executed balun is that it will largely prevent any RF currents flowing on the outside of the cable shield, say those coming from unwanted pickup of strong local stations, from reaching the radio chassis and the balanced antenna input. This property is normally mostly of use when you couple a cable to a highly directional antenna, like an UHF TV beam, since the cable currents may severely distort the beam pattern. In my situation a balun would both increase the signals of interest, and hopefully help in reducing the unwanted ones. While preassembled baluns are available from many sources, I decided to build my own, since I had the parts, I would be sure of its specifications and it probably would take less time to make one than shopping around for a factory made unit. Since a balun is basically a coil on a toroidal powdered iron or ferrite core plus a few odds and ends, there is not much to go wrong when making one. Here is the finished unit, using a pair of banana plugs as connectors to the radio: http://www.warpspace.com/glowbugs/oz.../balun1_sm.jpg Enlarge photo. http://www.warpspace.com/glowbugs/oz.../balun2_sm.jpg Enlarge photo. http://www.warpspace.com/glowbugs/oz.../balun3_sm.jpg Enlarge photo. I had some Amidon T50-12 (50-200MHz) powdered iron toroidal cores, colourcoded white/lime green. A quick look at the datasheet and I knew that 20 windings would give an inductance of 0.72 uH. The three individual copper wires are wound lightly together before threading them onto the core as a single piece of wire. The number of windings is the number of times the 'wire' passes through the hole in the center. The toroid is affixed to the glassfibre base board with another scrap of bare PCB material and a nylon M3x15 bolt and nut. With the balun in place the number of stations found dropped to 23, equivalent to those, which are supposed to be there, plus the set of five, which manages to be heard through direct radiation into the radio. Additionally at least so far I have not noticed any intereference problems, which was the main reason for building the balun in the first place. Best regards Frank N. |
8th Mar 2006, 3:24 pm | #2 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: near Reading (and sometimes Torquay)
Posts: 3,100
|
Re: Fighting VHF interference with a DIY balun.
I have often wondered whether this would help so I am seriously interested in this as I have noticed that unwanted multi-paths are coming off our cable, and the 30 year old FM tuner must again work in spite of Heathrow since the DAB tuner has already died, aged 2.
But can you explain exactly how the aerial relates to the coax so that things are unbalanced at that end too? Do you need another balun at the dipole? If not then how does the "unbalanced" state work? Also, at these frequencies, why do you need a core at all? |
8th Mar 2006, 4:36 pm | #3 | ||
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Posts: 281
|
Re: Fighting VHF interference with a DIY balun.
Quote:
Quote:
Hope this helps a bit. Frank N. |
||
1st Jul 2006, 1:52 pm | #4 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monmouthshire,on South Wales border
Posts: 85
|
Re: Fighting VHF interference with a DIY balun.
Quote:
|
|
1st Jul 2006, 2:13 pm | #5 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Posts: 281
|
Re: Fighting VHF interference with a DIY balun.
Quote:
|
|
30th Jul 2006, 9:43 pm | #6 |
Pentode
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Crawley Down, West Sussex, UK.
Posts: 151
|
Re: Fighting VHF interference with a DIY balun.
Maybe a passive bandpass filter or trap could be fitted to the aerial input? Is the set earthed? It could be the signals are being picked up by the chassis as your in line of sight?
Only a guess though...
__________________
My Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/simonspiers |
1st Aug 2006, 8:13 am | #7 | |||
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Posts: 281
|
Re: Fighting VHF interference with a DIY balun.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Frank N. |
|||