|
Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets. |
|
Thread Tools |
31st May 2016, 9:31 am | #1 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire, UK.
Posts: 3,762
|
Capacitor polarity ID.
Which is the pos the thin one or the thick one?
Cheers, Mick. |
31st May 2016, 10:43 am | #2 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,433
|
Re: Capacitor polarity ID.
Without more info I would go for the thin one being positive.
Hopefully there are some markings on the body or the pins. Frank |
31st May 2016, 10:54 am | #3 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,288
|
Re: Capacitor polarity ID.
I have a lot of these green capacitors and hadn't realised that they had no polarity markings.
Give me a couple of hours and I'll test one (hopefully not to destruction!) and let you know the result.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
31st May 2016, 11:04 am | #4 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 2,508
|
Re: Capacitor polarity ID.
Is that a commercially-applied re-forming date label? What does it say and how does it compare to the manufacture date?
Perhaps there's continuity from neg tag to case? |
31st May 2016, 11:22 am | #5 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,288
|
Re: Capacitor polarity ID.
I have several of the caps which are made by Plessey. There are no polarity markings at all. The can isn't accessible for continuity testing as it's entirely covered in plastic.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
31st May 2016, 11:28 am | #6 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 4,396
|
Re: Capacitor polarity ID.
It has all the air of a military label, from the era of large, regular intake- possibly even National Service- and the need to occupy idle hands, the "whitewashing coal" syndrome! Would a commercial organisation really bother with re-forming, or would they just sling them out and buy new?
|
31st May 2016, 11:52 am | #7 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,288
|
Re: Capacitor polarity ID.
Wide tag negative.
Narrow tag positive. Final answer.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
2nd Jun 2016, 11:11 am | #8 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chesterfield, Derbyshire, UK.
Posts: 3,762
|
Re: Capacitor polarity ID.
Thank's for the info Graham, the reform date is June 1972. Mick.
|
2nd Jun 2016, 12:07 pm | #9 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 4,396
|
Re: Capacitor polarity ID.
It's a diversion from OP, but I'm still intrigued that it has undergone formal reformation as late as 1972 when electrolytics were no longer remotely exotic/expensive components. It seems difficult to believe that a commercial organisation would be able to justify any cost/benefit over discarding/replacement and it also seems difficult to believe that the military would countenance putting superannuated stock of such a relatively trivially priced component into, well, just about anything.
Reforming electrolytics is something I occasionally do when working on old stuff, but I'd classify it as recreational/curiosity more than anything else and only if it is a fairly key mechanical/appearance/presentation sort of thing. I'm not a profligate sort of person but if there's the slightest doubt about a capacitor or the chance of it ruining an expensive rectifier/transformer/whatever, it'll be swapped for a good quality modern component. Just a tad intrigued! |
2nd Jun 2016, 4:40 pm | #10 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Solihull, West Midlands, UK.
Posts: 4,872
|
Re: Capacitor polarity ID.
Perhaps reforming avoided the paperwork required for replacing an old component with a slightly different modern component?
|