UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > Other Discussions > Homebrew Equipment

Notices

Homebrew Equipment A place to show, design and discuss the weird and wonderful electronic creations from the hands of individual members.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 16th Feb 2007, 5:24 pm   #1
Pete_kaye
Octode
 
Pete_kaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 1,227
Default Converting from MW to Lw

I have been building various simple one transistor sets using crytal set ideas from various forums.I want to extend coverage on my present home made coil to cover 1500m or 198 KHZ.Presently It covers 100m ~600m with using only one gang of 2X500pf tuner.I have other tuner and fixed caps in my 'bits and pieces'.Is it possible to extend the coverage by adding in extra caps in parallel to bring in Lw or do I have to make up a bigger coil?I have done some calculations and it seems that the 'LC' product must be about 20 times larger or another 2000pF adding in .Is it as simple as this in practice ?Are there other ways?
TIA
Pete_kaye is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2007, 5:37 pm   #2
Steve_P
Dekatron
 
Steve_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 6,644
Default Re: Converting from MW to Lw

Every single set design I've ever seen involves a bigger coil for Long Wave. Certainly that's the case in the Practical Wireless designs book.

Cheers,

Steve P
__________________
If we've always had it, why is the Car Boot open? You're not sneaking another Old TV in are you...?
Steve_P is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2007, 5:45 pm   #3
paulsherwin
Moderator
 
paulsherwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,970
Default Re: Converting from MW to Lw

It's possible to do it by padding with a cap and a few commercial sets did do it this way. You do lose sensitivity compared with a coil though. You'll need about 1000-2000pF.

If you don't want to wind a coil you could always use one from a scrap transistor set.

Paul
paulsherwin is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2007, 10:15 am   #4
Ian - G4JQT
Octode
 
Ian - G4JQT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Reading/Fakenham, UK.
Posts: 1,326
Default Re: Converting from MW to Lw

Easy way is to put a fixed cap across the tuning cap, although as Paul says you will lose sensitivity. If posible use a silver mica cap, or failing that polystyrene to keep the Q as high as possible.

Ian
Ian - G4JQT is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2007, 11:05 pm   #5
oldoddbod
Retired Dormant Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lincoln, UK
Posts: 1
Smile Re: Converting from MW to Lw

I would definitely go for the increase in inductor value, particularly in simple receivers. Just adding a cap. across the existing coil gives an inefficient L to C ratio and poorer results as has been mentioned earlier.
Brian
oldoddbod is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2007, 4:51 pm   #6
Pete_kaye
Octode
 
Pete_kaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 1,227
Default Re: Converting from MW to Lw

Yes my experiments confirm what has been said here.I am using a home made coil presently on a 3" tube with 10 turns of enemelled wire as the aerial /earth coil and on the same former 45 turns with 3 taps across the tuning condensor.The former is now full up .I have plenty more of the wire and wound this on a separate 4" plastic pipe but not sure how to add it in ,Does it need to be inline /below the original one?The circuit is found on http://www.crystalradio.net/beginners2/index.shtml as Oatbox set #2
Pete_kaye is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2007, 6:02 pm   #7
paulsherwin
Moderator
 
paulsherwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,970
Default Re: Converting from MW to Lw

The coils just have to be in series. not physically above one another.

I'm no expert on this RF stuff but I think PVC piping (sink drainage pipe etc) isn't too good as a coil former because it lowers the Q of the coil. Cardboard is better, the stuff from inside rolls of foil or clingfilm is ideal, or you can use a small glass jar such as a meat paste jar. Something to try maybe?

Paul
paulsherwin is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2007, 6:15 pm   #8
Ed_Dinning
Dekatron
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK.
Posts: 8,195
Default Re: Converting from MW to Lw

Hi Gents, cardboard is definately better as it has a lower Er or permitivitty than plastic, so the Q reducing self capacitace is reduced. If you want to be a purist air is the best, but failing that by spacing the winding off the former by means of several matchsticks round the diameter of the coil it can be improved further.

Ed
Ed_Dinning is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2007, 9:09 pm   #9
jim_jobe
Heptode
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ripon, N.Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 782
Default Re: Converting from MW to Lw

Some of Sir Douglas Hall's designs used a single coil for both LW and MW. He achieved this by putting a fairly low-value fixed capacitor in parallel with it and then using permeability tuning.
Jim
jim_jobe is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2007, 4:35 pm   #10
Biggles
Rest in Peace
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hexham, Northumberland, UK.
Posts: 2,234
Default Re: Converting from MW to Lw

I must admit I have never had much success with long wave crystal sets. I think it is because we have a high powered transmitter (Stagshaw, ERP 50KW)on Medium Wave a few miles away and this tends to break through due to the low selectivity of the set. You don't really need any components apart from a diode and headphones to pick up the transmission at our house! Most of the LW sets I have seen put the LW and MW coils in series when switched to LW.

Biggles.

Last edited by Biggles; 19th Feb 2007 at 4:38 pm. Reason: more info
Biggles is offline  
Closed Thread




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 5:28 am.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.