27th May 2012, 9:04 am | #161 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dorset, UK.
Posts: 947
|
Re: This forum
The funding question seems to be able to be resolved as enough people have expressed their willingness to make a contribution.
There just remains the other issues. I have been thinking about the "missing" posts. Although I have no details of them, I can imagine what I would delete were I a moderator here (and I am glad I am not!). Just before each event at Harpenden, or RWB, Jeffrey (ppppenguin) usually posts a reminder about the Bring and Buy stall. Others then post personal reminders such as "take ABC 23 for Fred, collect XYZ 32 from Bert". Once that event is over, I can see no value in retaining such reminders. It is too late to act upon them, and even with the best stretch of the imagination, I cannot see them being of interest to a future historian. Hence a lot of posts have zero value and, I believe, SHOULD be deleted. As for governance, my personal view is that a forum such as this can not be a democracy. It doesnt work. I moderate a forum that recently had a similar "uprising of discontent" that we are seeing here. From being a tightly run and regulated forum, according to rules instigated by the owner, it went to a more democratic system. That suited a few, but others left as they didnt like the way it was run. That caused even more arguments, with many people claiming they could run it better. Eventually several went off and started their own forums (two of them). At that point, the moderators convinced the owner that it wasnt working and it went back to some more sensible rules and moderation. Of the two new boards it spawned, one failed very quickly. The other, supposedly democratically run, eventually instigated rules and enforced them, and now staggers on with a few members and about 5 posts per day. (The original had 1,500 members & 200+ posts daily.) No. IMHO, the only way to run a forum such as this is to do as has been done up to now. It wont suit everybody, but then, nothing will. |
27th May 2012, 9:22 am | #162 | |
Octode
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Posts: 1,522
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
However my concern is if fund raising is left to the good will of members, this good will may be lost if we are left feeling disenfranchised. Offering an incentive is merely appealing to human nature, as much as I would love to share in the general utopian view of things. Cheers, Rob.
__________________
We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing. |
|
27th May 2012, 10:01 am | #163 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
|
|
27th May 2012, 10:07 am | #164 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
Please refer back to Paul's post #6. Basically, this forum is interfering with Paul's livelihood and it could be closed down, in a matter of weeks. Why are we arguing about some inaccessible "junk" posts and other trivial matters when the whole forum could be lost forever? Regards David
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/ My Nixie Clocks |
|
27th May 2012, 10:17 am | #165 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,864
|
Re: This forum
|
27th May 2012, 10:27 am | #166 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bristol, UK.
Posts: 808
|
Re: This forum
With regard to governance I too have no problems at all with present situation and I reiterate Dave's last comment.
If Paul has to close the Forum everything is academic. The metaphysical arguments that the forum belongs to its members, who should control the policies seem pointless. |
27th May 2012, 10:29 am | #167 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
As several of us have said before, there are now a number of forums where we can discuss our interests so the loss of UKVRR would be a nuisance but no longer earth shattering [deliberate exaggeration, no smiley available for that] At the moment, I hope that I am arguing a devil's advocate position in saying that the best way forward would be to close UKVRR altogether. |
|
27th May 2012, 10:41 am | #168 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
There maybe alternatives to this forum but there are, definitely, no substitutes. David
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/ My Nixie Clocks |
|
27th May 2012, 10:57 am | #169 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
UKVRR has devloped its own character and it is self evident that any other forum will be different, each with own unique focus. It is of the nature of life in general that organisations (I'm trying to find an all embracing word) wax and wane. |
|
27th May 2012, 11:01 am | #170 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Heckmondwike, West Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 9,642
|
Re: This forum
One off-the-cuff remark - Be careful what you wish for.
I can't speak for Paul, but if things were jogging along nicely until the thorny issue of deleted posts, which is one of the main philosophical arguments, how about making the "skip" available for paid download as is the service data. Those who are exercised by it can have the best of both worlds and the rest of us can settle down to the Status Quo. |
27th May 2012, 11:58 am | #171 |
Octode
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Watford, Hertfordshire, UK.
Posts: 1,270
|
Re: This forum
I have been recommended the following:-
www.servage.net for £4.50 per month you get unlimited disc space and unlimited transfer bandwidth. Full php support suitable for this Forum plus sql databases which should satisfy the needs of the Forum. My friend has been using this service for 10 years and has watched them grow and improve to offer this service reliably. He has 10 separate websites hosted in the one account without any issue.
__________________
Whether the Top Cap is Grid or Anode - touching it will give you a buzz either way! |
27th May 2012, 12:22 pm | #172 | ||
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fakenham, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 4,259
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
Absolutely no shooting down intended Just that from all I've gathered here the amount of cash required to secure hosting of the forum in a way that would make it less of a burden to Paul, and obviate the need to delete any old posts, would be in the order at most of £12 to £15 a week. For many of us that's an hour's pay. £12 to £15 a week between the hundreds of active members here. Certainly the service has to be paid for somehow, I'm just thinking that the best way to pay for it would be through no-strings donations from folks who, like myself, may not agree with all aspects of how things are run here but value the whole enough to want to take their part in paying for its continuance. I'm not sure adequate funding would come along that way, but from all that's been said I think the signs are good. Why opt instead for a more restricted service whose additional administration needs would probably tie one of us at least into doing something he'd really rather not for easily an hour or two a week? Let's as far as possible restrict humdrum compulsory activities to those we get paid for Paul |
||
27th May 2012, 12:38 pm | #173 | |
Heptode
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 990
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
OK the need for a 'skip' is obvious, for the genuine spam/illegible/abusive posts. But I believe we have already established that not all of the 46000 posts deleted fall into this category. I feel you fail to recognise that the forum is already being lost, in 46000 post chunks. I don't now what useful content has been ditched and neither does anyone else it appears, that is the point myself and others in this thread are trying to make and are concerned about. Was it necessary to 'cull' anything from the forum when we are all so willing to provide funds so the forum can continue complete and intact? Regards |
|
27th May 2012, 12:49 pm | #174 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Worksop, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Posts: 5,554
|
Re: This forum
I have been thinking about how the bandwidth issue can be sorted out without losing it all or scanning it needlessly.
There must be a file comparison utility that can be used in conjunction with the model lists on many museum sites. This could be used to create a live google searchable listing of model numbers found in the archive. The archive itself could be on a satellite server with a random text lock just like the one we filled in when we joined on it so that positive action needs to be taken by the user before it uses any bandwidth at all what so ever. This could answer both the archive retention issue and the bandwidth issue in one go. The other thing that has bothered some users has been raised in three messages in this thread. First time by me in message 113 on page 6, By Repairman 1234 message 156 page 8 and Robert Darwent message 157 page 8. We are all of the generation whom had to learn electronics by experience without formal teaching as none were there at the time. This involved spending time with our heads in the backs of sets while the older folk at the time were telling us we should get our spelling spot on first. If we did that we would never have got round to learning about radios that were being dumped in huge numbers at the time. If we were on a website that related to a language school the spell check reminders would be truly fitting however here a fitting compromise could be found that takes into account the time we have all had to spend with our heads in the backs of sets in order to get here. |
27th May 2012, 1:26 pm | #175 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Whittlesey, near Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Posts: 3,763
|
Re: This forum
I, too would be more than happy to pay a tenner a year to have access to a forum which has not only given me a lot of valuable advice, but has enabled me to meet a lot of interesting and generous people.
Barry |
27th May 2012, 1:54 pm | #176 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: This forum
Could Paul post an email address for contributions, then he would know how many people are prepared to contribute (a sperate thread would be good considering how long this one is) and then divi it up and ask (in the thread) for the amount required from the responders?
|
27th May 2012, 2:23 pm | #177 | ||
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK.
Posts: 749
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
|
||
27th May 2012, 2:52 pm | #178 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denbighshire, north Wales, UK.
Posts: 43
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
|
|
27th May 2012, 3:15 pm | #179 | ||
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
Quote:
Regards David
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/ My Nixie Clocks |
||
27th May 2012, 3:24 pm | #180 | ||
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK.
Posts: 749
|
Re: This forum
Quote:
So am I to imagine that 2000+ posts made by Paul Stenning were completely OT, illegible, abusive etc?? I would prefer to have been given notice of the deletions so that I could have copied any that I wanted to keep. Quote:
Regards David[/QUOTE] Jolly good then it's STRING |
||