|
Vintage Audio (record players, hi-fi etc) Amplifiers, speakers, gramophones and other audio equipment. |
|
Thread Tools |
26th May 2008, 8:26 pm | #1 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
Quad 405 overheating
After 30 years of faithful service from new my Quad 405 was getting very hot this evening. I haven't done any serious fault finding yet - I don't think I've ever had the lid off before - so I thought I'd ask the experts first.
Amp was getting very hot so switched off in a hurry. Didn't even listen to see which channel wasn't working, if any. Amp is marked Quad 405 but my booklet is marked 405-2. It has the earlier bronze heatsink and serial number is 25561. The channel PCBs are marked Quad 405 and M12368 ISS9. The Quad booklet doesn't have a full circuit diagram but I have Peter Walker's December 1975 Wireless World article which does. That article says the output transistors are BDY77. My amp has Toshiba 2SD424. First tests show that on one channel:
PS: Found a Quad service manual online which seems to have schematics for all the PCB variants. Last edited by ppppenguin; 26th May 2008 at 8:41 pm. |
26th May 2008, 8:41 pm | #2 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: North West Northamptonshire, UK.
Posts: 346
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
Hi Jeffrey
Try Googleing BDY77. Quite reasonable price. Regards ALAN |
26th May 2008, 8:55 pm | #3 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
RS have got the 2N3773G (the G means lead free) for £3.72+VAT. This seems to be a recommended replacement.
|
26th May 2008, 8:58 pm | #4 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 6,644
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
Change both O/P transistors! And check around them too for shorts and duff parts which caused them to fail.
Cheers, Steve P.
__________________
If we've always had it, why is the Car Boot open? You're not sneaking another Old TV in are you...? |
26th May 2008, 9:06 pm | #5 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 366
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
My 405 is Serial 32XXX so of similar vintage, the O/P transistors are, as you say 2SD424. Your booklet must be much later than the amp. I have my original booklet and circuit diagram. Will look for it now, I can scan it if you like.
It's gone wrong because I looked at it! |
26th May 2008, 9:07 pm | #6 |
Hexode
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Posts: 329
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
Hi Jeffrey,
I've repaired several Quad 405's in a previous life... The small signal transistors in the early stages have a habit of dying (short) which takes out the output trannies as the whole amp is DC coupled. I'm sure you're already aware of this, but you need to run the amp up on test very gently on a current-limited supply after repair as they have a nasty habit of taking out your new o/p trannies if there's a rougue fault still lurking in an earlier stage. Often, for speed, we would blanket replace all the transistors on the board. Cheers, Mark. |
26th May 2008, 9:08 pm | #7 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Derby, UK.
Posts: 7,735
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
Quote:
Also, on any amp where both the output transistors are of the same sex, you may have to adjust the biasing if you replace them.
__________________
If I have seen further than others, it is because I was standing on a pile of failed experiments. |
|
26th May 2008, 9:26 pm | #8 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 366
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
Hi Jeffrey
Just looked at my circuit boards and they are marked M12368 ISS9 between the two fuses, seems to be same as yours. Just sent you circuit diag. I can guarantee that this diag. was supplied with my amp. After fixing it, I suggest that a big improvement can be made by replacing the op amps with TL071. The original op amps should be in sockets, so its easy. Burr Brown op amps are supposed to the the best, I have tried them, did not really hear much (if any difference), but the 071s are way way better than original LM301A. |
26th May 2008, 9:28 pm | #9 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
The remaining channel seems fine. I'm planning to check all the transistors on the dead channel and run it up on a bench supply with a very low current limit initially.
Do you think the 2N3773 is a sensible replacement for the 2SD424? PS: I think I've got some TL071 in stock so I'll replace the LM301. |
26th May 2008, 9:50 pm | #10 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 366
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
I don,t really know about the 2N3773, but Cricklewood Electronics have the 2SD424
http://www.cricklewoodelectronics.co...=search&page=1 Think I would be tempted to use those, not sure if they are Toshiba ones though. I think I remember that their can be oscillation problems with the 405, so I would play safe. Changing to the TL071 is safe, I have done it. It is used in the 405-2. I also have a 405-2. The improvement in sound quality between this and a standard 405 is quite large. However, to me a 405 with TL071, sounds very similar to the 405-2, can't be bad. Some info here, easy to get carried away though! http://quadrevisionspot.blogspot.com/ |
26th May 2008, 10:12 pm | #11 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 366
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
I converted one of my 405s to a 405-2 using the Quad modules which came with 4mm sockts for the speaker connection (replacing those spring loaded things). I also took the opportunity to fit phono sockets for the input and an on-off switch.
These are great, making the amp more versatile. No drilling was required, there are four holes in the back panel with gromets fitted, Just took three gromets out and the two phono sockets and switch fitted perfectly. Perhaps I should have fitted a volume control as well. |
26th May 2008, 10:24 pm | #12 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 366
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
Just noticed that on the "Quad Spot" it does mention the 2N3773, below is an extract:
* TR1: BC214C - BC559C BC560C BC415C * TR2: ZTX304 - BCX32 BC682 BC546B MPSA06 2N5551 * TR3/TR4: ZTX504 - BC556B * TR5/TR6: BC214C - BC560C BC415C BC559C * TR7/TR8: 40872 - 2SA740 BD242C 2N6134 TIP42C BDX78 * TR9/TR10: 17556 - 2SD424 2SD676 2N3773 MJ15003 |
26th May 2008, 10:32 pm | #13 | |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 366
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
Quote:
However, that is one of the points about the 405, no preset adjustment carried out in manufacture and no adjustments needed during its life. |
|
26th May 2008, 10:34 pm | #14 |
Dekatron
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Invercargill, New Zealand
Posts: 3,440
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
If audiomm is around at any stage he's an expert on these things so can probably offer some advice.
The only thing I'd say (knowing nothing about Quad) is to remember to remove the compensation caps if you're replaing LM301 with an internally compensated op-amp like the TL071. Not sure what happens if you leave them, but you don't need them there. |
26th May 2008, 11:35 pm | #15 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 366
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
I have done several conversions of 405 changing from LM301 to TL071 and never removed the 3.3 pF capacitor between pins 1 and 8. All amps have run like this for years, sounding good and proving reliable. I believe that pin 8 on the TL071 is not connected, so it is unnecesaary to remove the compensation capacitor. Anyway, in the unlikely event of wanting to change back to the LM301, it is just a case of putting the chip back in.
Also just noticed that the parts list supplied with my Quad 405 does show the 2N3773 as an alternative output transistor, see below: Last edited by mastermanx2001; 26th May 2008 at 11:54 pm. |
27th May 2008, 10:47 am | #16 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 366
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
Just had the obvious thought, for those inductors to have got hot and a fuse blow, some heavy DC has probably been flowing. I hope that your speakers are OK, worth checking. There is protection circuitry in those speakers, though I am sure that you are aware of that.
Last edited by mastermanx2001; 27th May 2008 at 11:09 am. Reason: spelling |
27th May 2008, 11:44 am | #17 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
I know the ESL63 has a crowbar circuit (as does the 405) and will find out whether all is well when I repair the amp and reconnect everything.
A helpful fellow, not a forum member, emailed me and commented on some aspects of the crowbar design which could give trouble. He also suggested that the cooked choke could have shorted turns and I will check this on an LCR meter. |
27th May 2008, 11:58 am | #18 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 366
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
Yes the 405 protection has been known to cause problems, there is some info about that on the Quad Spot
|
27th May 2008, 4:08 pm | #19 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North London, UK.
Posts: 6,168
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
I've had a closer look and it looks like it's just one 2SD424 output tranny and the fuse. All the other devices are intact, the electrolytics are still OK and the cooked choke is fine. I've ordered a couple of 2SD424 from Cricklewood so I'll report back when they're here.
I'll fire up the board on the bench first and be a bit wary of the output crowbar when I put the board back in the box. |
27th May 2008, 4:48 pm | #20 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 366
|
Re: Quad 405 overheating
Hmm! I wonder if the speaker crowbared causing the problem. I know it sounds obvious but how about putting some extra fuses in between the amp and the speaker, even just as a temporary measure until everything is proven. I guess that you will test the amp into something less valuable anyway.
|