|
Homebrew Equipment A place to show, design and discuss the weird and wonderful electronic creations from the hands of individual members. |
|
Thread Tools |
29th Nov 2007, 11:11 pm | #21 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Quote:
Al, That's a great idea. I think it would work very well, so thanks.
__________________
Al |
|
29th Nov 2007, 11:17 pm | #22 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Quote:
https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/...ad.php?t=23008
__________________
Al |
|
5th Dec 2007, 7:52 pm | #23 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Quote:
And I don't know yet, but I do know that 20Kv isn't an unusual anode voltage for radar modulators and magnetrons. That's just a tad more than the 3,800 v that we have in our kitchen microwave ovens, right? I read somewhere (a vintage article on the subject) that because of the very low duty-cycle, anode voltages were sometimes hugely exceeded. Oh, and tube heaters were also over-run (clearly reducing tube life) to increase electron emission.
__________________
Al Last edited by Al (astral highway); 5th Dec 2007 at 7:57 pm. |
|
6th Dec 2007, 12:35 am | #24 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bewdley, Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 4,748
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Quote:
Phil
__________________
Phil Optimist [n]: One who is not in possession of the full facts Last edited by Phil G4SPZ; 6th Dec 2007 at 12:39 am. Reason: Comment added |
|
6th Dec 2007, 8:38 am | #25 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Hi Phil and thanks. That's an interesting situation, isn't it? How do 'they' define radio? They must be focussing on the application rather than the means of propagation.
__________________
Al |
6th Dec 2007, 10:21 am | #26 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,289
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
The amateur licence used to define what modes of modulation could be used and I think it included pulse type transmissions for radar experiments. However all that information has been removed from the latest licence. The licence does talk about communicating though and I don't think radar is a means of communication.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
6th Dec 2007, 12:54 pm | #27 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
I think it would be prudent and the act of a responsible person to make absolutely sure that you can operate the radar.
Implications of interference ,safety etc |
6th Dec 2007, 1:27 pm | #28 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Quote:
Indeed, you're absolutely right. That's why I've talked in earlier parts of this thread about using a dummy aerial/load, about conducting tests for durations of just milliseconds, about derating the HT+ power supply to reduce pulse power, isolating the magnetron and so on. Rest assured that there's no question of my pointing the waveguide out of the window and firing the thing up blindly at full power!
__________________
Al |
|
6th Dec 2007, 2:46 pm | #29 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Penrith, Cumbria, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
I thought the figure was as low as 8.9kV (for copper electrodes inside valves) before X-Rays started to be emitted?
__________________
Regds, Russell W. B. G4YLI. |
6th Dec 2007, 11:31 pm | #30 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Penrith, Cumbria, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
One definitely needs a licence to radiate professional RADAR signals!
__________________
Regds, Russell W. B. G4YLI. |
6th Dec 2007, 11:51 pm | #31 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bewdley, Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 4,748
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Quote:
I may be wrong, but if you don't hold an amateur licence, then it seems to me that the transmission of RF power into anything other than a non-radiating dummy load would contravene the Wireless Telegraphy Act unless you can find an ISM frequency allocation, and prove that your weather radar operates in that band, is type-approved and WT licence exempt... all highly unlikely, I expect...! Phil
__________________
Phil Optimist [n]: One who is not in possession of the full facts |
|
7th Dec 2007, 9:42 am | #32 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Quote:
Just to reassure, you, let me plainly state that what I'm intending to do is to restore the radar, not operate it for its own sake. In the process, I will: 1) initially isolate the magnetron 2) test each sub-circuit independently 3) test the entire set, including the magnetron at a voltage and into a non-radiating dummy load 4) test the entire set, including the magnetron, at full voltage into a suitable, non-radiating dummy load. Once I have finished restoring the set, I will again remove the magnetron and keep it away from the rest of the set so that the apparatus can't be used by the unwary. I'll then move on to restoring a suitable indicator unit, so plenty of other challenges lined up to keep my happy. But that's another story and another thread, if it ever comes to that. Thanks for your interest
__________________
Al |
|
7th Dec 2007, 11:24 am | #33 |
Hexode
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Helston, Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 303
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Al, I think it will be a while before you are ready for the load, PM me before the event and I'll arrange to come down, I'm sure I'll be able to find a suitable non-radiating load, I don't, however think I'll apply for a NoV to my amateur licence!!
Cheers Tim M0AFJ |
7th Dec 2007, 11:34 am | #34 |
Hexode
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Helston, Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 303
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
When you get the unit can you let me have precise dimensions of the WG O/P, it looks like it should be WG14 (US WR137), and the flange mounting sizes.
Thanks Tim M0AFJ |
7th Dec 2007, 1:21 pm | #35 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London, UK.
Posts: 3,496
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Quote:
Hi Tim, yes I'll PM you when it comes down, with the WG dimensions. Many thanks for your interest and offer to help.
__________________
Al |
|
8th Dec 2007, 11:11 pm | #36 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: St.Ippolyts, Hitchin, Hertfordshire QRA IO91UW
Posts: 3,518
|
Re: Dummy aerial - 4 to 8 cm ( or specifically 5.5 Ghz) - suggestions?
Seeing as this thread has strayed so much I am going to close it
__________________
Engineers make things work and have spare bits when finished |