![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Television Standards Converters, Modulators etc Standards converters, modulators anything else for providing signals to vintage televisions. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Solingen, Germany
Posts: 727
|
![]()
I am happy to be able to make my own transistor
design. ![]() It is no problem to be better than " National " ![]() The trouble is I am not able to explain my circuit in english ![]() what happens here. Have a look at Q69 and Q670 for example: They replace several IC's an analog switch IC, a few opamps, a Schmitt trigger and a white clip stage ... The stage Q66 Q67 David only uses one transistor to replace the diode. Davids stage is 500 times better than a diode! (500 is the B of BC547C) and the stage I used is 250000 times better than a diode. Do you understand this? The audio modulator Q64 combines a modulator and a so called " infinitive detector " I have made a DC-coupled negative feedback from the detector to the input. The audio stages are Loftin- White stages. ![]() This is high end hifi design ![]() In the IC applicationes you would need a additional receiver to make this... ![]() The modulator transistors are similar to the g1 modulation used in (vintage) transmitters. What I wounder about is that nobody has seen the inputs. At the video input you must have 75Ohm ![]() The video output must have 75 Ohms too. If you load the output with 75 Ohms you get 1Vpp video at peak white. This is a standard!!!!!!! The audio input impedance must be more than 50KOhms for scart and RCA plugs. If there is a 1KOhm poti and a low input resistance you get loss in bass and the outout stage is overloaded. Note that a typical audio output has a 2uF cap! Sorry for my bad english... Look here, I drawed a block diagram for the modulator video section. The input filter and Blatt 8 will be added soon in the Normwandler website. www.pixum.de/viewalbum/?id=1137100 Kind regards Darius |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Solingen, Germany
Posts: 727
|
![]()
Hi all,
the website http://www.your-normwandler-page.de.vu/ is updated now. ![]() Please have a look at the foto " VCR video in " You can see the videosignal of a not modified VCR playing back a 405 video. The sync signal moves up and down and makes a yump after the V- puls. ![]() This causes bad syncronisation at the top of the picture. ![]() In the foto " VCR video out " you can see the videosignal after passing the clamp stages at the output of the video amp Blatt 8. The video signal is perfect now. ![]() The TV has no sync problems any more and the signal can be recorded. ![]() Can you see the great progress against the other modulators? : ![]() If your 405 source is a VCR you must try out this! ![]() In the website Blatt 8 is added you can see the power supply and the scart video output amp. I added a few ordercodes from RS for you. Have a look at the bias voltage-generator Basis Q67. Exept the oscillator frequency the whole thing needs no agliment! ![]() Please let me know what you think about it... @Malcolm and Jeffrey I had a look at the LM1881.pdf They wrote that the 1881 is made for sync sep. at good signal quality. My sync seperator stage is made to get the sync from badly damaged video signals as well! This is importand for 405 video playback. I used a trick to make the seperator's live easyer. Look at Q69 it is a amp which has a gain of (-)3. Normally it is not possible to get this gain at an operating voltage of 5V DC and an input voltage range up to 2Vpp (1V video+DC level changes). I moved the bias of Q69 that the sync is in the linear region and the rest is clippt away. The DC movements in the signal at the collector of Q69 are less, because the white levels are clippt. The sync has a higher level. This makes live easy for the sync seperator. If you connect pin 2 of the LM1881 over an inverter to collector of Q69, you get the same quality of sync seperation as I have. But for me it makes no sens to replace Q670 by the LM1881 an inverter and a output transistor. Do you agree with this? Kind regards Darius |
![]() |