|
Vintage Audio (record players, hi-fi etc) Amplifiers, speakers, gramophones and other audio equipment. |
|
Thread Tools |
1st Mar 2018, 8:01 am | #1 |
Pentode
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Cheshire, UK.
Posts: 121
|
Armstrong 400 series question
I've read (on Jim Lesurf's fine website) that the Armstrong 400 series and 500 series all used the same PCB's and output transistors. I wondered if they were interchangeble between the two series? main reason I'm asking is that the 400 is rated at 15 watts output, but the 500 is 25 watts - so there must be some difference between the two to explain the improved output.
|
1st Mar 2018, 11:34 am | #2 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Southwold, Suffolk, UK.
Posts: 8,338
|
Re: Armstrong 400 series question
The power supply circuitry on the 500 is uprated to allow for increased power handling.
__________________
Edward. |
1st Mar 2018, 4:26 pm | #3 |
Pentode
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Cheshire, UK.
Posts: 121
|
Re: Armstrong 400 series question
So in theory if I had a 400 series with good PCB's (and a faulty chassis) i could use the PCBs unmodified as spares for 500 series?
|
1st Mar 2018, 8:10 pm | #4 |
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 1,082
|
Re: Armstrong 400 series question
There are two different power modules the all germanium A14 that was used in the 400 series and the silicon driver but germanium output A15
i think you will find the 400 series rated into a nominal 15 ohm and the 500 into 8 ohm the power supply voltages are very similar in both units the excellent web site shows these I ask why would you use the much rarer 400 parts as spares for the common 500 models there is a lot of information on the vintage radio site re fitting silicon devices in place of the now rare and expensive germanium Trev |
1st Mar 2018, 8:35 pm | #5 |
Pentode
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Cheshire, UK.
Posts: 121
|
Re: Armstrong 400 series question
Maybe my question was the wrong way around and should be "could I use 500 series cards in 400 series chassis". Just intrigued about the compatibility of components between the two types. I just love the whole card cage arrangement of these units - it reminds me of mainframe computer systems of the era - ICT 1900, EE System 4 and the like. The same ideas from the same decade go into the construction methods.
Off topic - almost - I see that the repair facility in Walthamstow that was all that remained of Armstrong is turning itself into a coffee shop. https://www.google.co.uk/maps/uv?hl=...ULN_sXC_z5hxOo |
1st Mar 2018, 9:00 pm | #6 |
Octode
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 1,082
|
Re: Armstrong 400 series question
Yes you can and i have already done so ! A very strange story Armstrong how they manged to grab failure from the jaws of success has always amazed me
Ted Rule the head designer was always a hero of mine and i always thought highly of his designs the 400 series is almost a clone of a 1964 harmon Kardon design all silicon and 50 watts a channel into 8 ohms I have one in my collection Although te Armstrong modular construction was to be an achillies heal in the end what with poor contacts Trev |
1st Mar 2018, 9:01 pm | #7 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,864
|
Re: Armstrong 400 series question
Wow, I almost feel like paying it a visit!
|
1st Mar 2018, 10:44 pm | #8 |
Pentode
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Cheshire, UK.
Posts: 121
|
Re: Armstrong 400 series question
I guess Ted and his team were always up against the cost of components. From what I've read the business aimed to make money - not necessarily quality product. The modular idea for the 500 series is excellent with regard to fault finding - if the connectors had been properly plated they would have been perfect. Cost constraints I guess. Having said that - who would have thought that they would still be around (and working) 40 years later.
|
1st Mar 2018, 10:51 pm | #9 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oxford, UK.
Posts: 17,864
|
Re: Armstrong 400 series question
More like 50
|