|
Vintage Amateur and Military Radio Amateur/military receivers and transmitters, morse, and any other related vintage comms equipment. |
|
Thread Tools |
13th Oct 2014, 8:15 pm | #1 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,935
|
Off-Centre-Fed (OCF) Dipoles
Something I'd never heard of until a few days ago is an OCF dipole, though it seems they been around since the early 1920's. A Google search finds numerous hits e.g http://www.m0zpk.co.uk/40-meter-off-centre-fed-dipole/. One appealing aspect of them is that they can be used for multiband operation without traps, but of course the asymmetric aspect of them also has appeal. I have a fair size garden, but the position of large trees and overhead electricity + telephone cables is restrictive on aerial layout. Anyone been down this route?
B
__________________
Saturn V had 6 million pounds of fuel. It would take thirty thousand strong men to lift it an inch. |
13th Oct 2014, 9:21 pm | #2 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cottingham, East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 5,765
|
Re: Off-Centre-Fed (OCF) Dipoles
Countless are in use the world over, as are G5RVs, but I dare say that as with the G5RV, many take the easy option and buy them off the shelf, like the rest of their gear. (See 'Carolina Windom'). A bit of a shame really, but there you go - antenna experimentation is one aspect of amateur radio where there is limitless scope for experimentation for little cost - baluns, be they 1:1 4:1 - can easily and cheaply be made, as can traps. I always made my own traps and dipole baluns when I was active on air, dipping the traps with a home-brew dip meter.
Happy days! Good luck with your experimentation.
__________________
David. BVWS Member. G-QRP Club member 1339. |
15th Oct 2014, 10:21 pm | #3 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,935
|
Re: Off-Centre-Fed (OCF) Dipoles
Well, the aerial/balun/atu/GDO will be homemade, but admit it will be my Trio boatanchor that finaly drives it... but at least I have had the covers off that and discovered safely that the full HT (~800V off-load) is present on the valves even on receive .
__________________
Saturn V had 6 million pounds of fuel. It would take thirty thousand strong men to lift it an inch. |
15th Oct 2014, 11:29 pm | #4 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,901
|
Re: Off-Centre-Fed (OCF) Dipoles
The HT is derived from the same mains transformer as powers the receiver, and I think most valved transceivers used voltage doublers and silicon diodes so there will be full HT available all the time. They just bias the valves far off rather than try to have anything shutting down the HT source.
I use an un-straight inverted Vee over the house. Having bought a new radio a few weeks ago the second contact was a station outside Hiroshima, so I was rather pleased with the antenna... I've used open wire feeder about 5 inch spacing with genuine Collins ceramic spacers straight down the gable end and into the shack to a KW/Decca 109 tuner and the new Icom 7700. The two halves of the inverted vee are about 30 degrees away from straight in a plan view. The 7700 has an internal tuner, but it's unbalanced. Trying to do a balun that works over a wide frequency range and over a wide impedance range is a sure disaster, so the Z-match tuner does the job. It's nice to show what can be done without towers. David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |
16th Oct 2014, 4:10 am | #5 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oxfordshire, UK.
Posts: 4,935
|
Re: Off-Centre-Fed (OCF) Dipoles
Quote:
I'm planning to sell this house next spring so any antenna which goes up now is really just to get me on 40m over the winter. Definitely no (big) trees at the next house; not only limiting with aerials but demand too much time when they shed leaves over the lawn, as in now the case . B
__________________
Saturn V had 6 million pounds of fuel. It would take thirty thousand strong men to lift it an inch. Last edited by Bazz4CQJ; 16th Oct 2014 at 4:18 am. |
|
16th Oct 2014, 9:01 am | #6 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 14,007
|
Re: Off-Centre-Fed (OCF) Dipoles
Quite!
I've experimented in the past with a full-wave dipole coax-fed 1/4-wave in from the end. In theory I should have needed a phasing-section to make it work properly but let's just say that this worked fine in practice. My current HF antennas are a 100mumble-foot-long end-fed series-tuned with a roller-coaster, and a dipole for 28MHz. |
19th Oct 2014, 5:12 am | #7 |
Heptode
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ashhurst, Manawatu, New Zealand
Posts: 571
|
Re: Off-Centre-Fed (OCF) Dipoles
It started off as a 66ft (short) longwire with a Bryant homebrew 9:1 un-un to 50ohm coax to my NRD515 but it had a big hole right where I wanted to listen, about 8MHz. I read about the OCFD and had a bit of space at the un-un end to add 22ft in a slightly different direction. Presto, problem solved, didn't change the un-un except to lift the ground off the antenna winding of course and now had much better broadband response.
__________________
Cheers - Martin ZL2MC |