|
Vintage Amateur and Military Radio Amateur/military receivers and transmitters, morse, and any other related vintage comms equipment. |
|
Thread Tools |
2nd Jan 2018, 4:22 pm | #41 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,998
|
Re: Trio 9R-59 'pulling'
My VFO still has the shroud, yes: I'll experiment with taking it off.
[I know what you mean about convector-heater-caused drift: as a student I lived in a Welsh farmhouse where the entire heating was convectors, and we were at the end of a rather long and ancient DNO feed. You could watch the lights flicker every couple of minutes as someone's convector turned on or off. Not at all good for free-running LO stability !] |
2nd Jan 2018, 5:13 pm | #42 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Dukinfield, Cheshire, UK.
Posts: 2,037
|
Re: Trio 9R-59 'pulling'
Quote:
__________________
Andy G1HBE. |
|
6th Jan 2018, 5:30 pm | #43 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,998
|
Re: Trio 9R-59 'pulling'
Further experimentation - I found that the leadouts to the second [unused] triode of the ECC85 were unconnected and floating, as was the internal screen [pin 9]. Earthing these seems to have given a slight reduction in warmup drift.
It puzzles me though - why the designers specified an ECC85 - with its unnecessarily powerful 0.45A heater (that's the same power as a 6V6!) - only to use half of it. Something like a 12AT7, with only one half lit - would only take 0.15A and so reduce the amount of excess heat noticeably. 2.83 Watts of heater for the ECC85, 0.945 Watts of heater for half a 12AT7. (The ECC85 doesn't have a centre-tapped filament so you *have* to power both triodes even if you're only using one.) My next experiment will be to see which of the half-dozen examples of the ECC85 I have here (Tungsram, Mullard, Valvo) give the least drift. |
6th Jan 2018, 6:42 pm | #44 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bewdley, Worcestershire, UK.
Posts: 4,748
|
Re: Trio 9R-59 'pulling'
Maybe they thought that the higher heater power would swamp any ambient temperature changes and improve the drift performance? Is that what made them slip a matt black shroud over it too? Or else the ECC85 was simply a lot cheaper than the 12AT7...
__________________
Phil Optimist [n]: One who is not in possession of the full facts |
6th Jan 2018, 7:28 pm | #45 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 13,998
|
Re: Trio 9R-59 'pulling'
Unless one of them pops up on-net to give commentary I guess we will never know what went through the minds of the 1960s Trio-Kenwood Corporation designers when selecting their valves. [their use of the 6BE6 - which has a rather high equivalent-noise-resistance - as mixer rather than a 6BA7 or half an ECH81 - is also strange].
But I do have a dozen or so 12AT7WA [the ruggedized, controlled-warmup-heater version specified for various bits of 1950s military gear] here so could do some experimentation. Now I've got pin-9 grounded it's a dead-simple swap. |
7th Jan 2018, 12:08 pm | #46 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 4,396
|
Re: Trio 9R-59 'pulling'
Perhaps they needed the high gm of the ECC85 to guarantee oscillation as L/C ratio got lousy on the highest band, and the good emission from that heating power helped to sledgehammer circuit losses, especially if the tuned elements had been doused in wizzo Japanese damping wax? The Pye CAT here has a modest little EC90 (1/2 ECC82 in effect) with gentle 0.15A heater as 1st LO, things were obviously running fine on the lowest 7 bands but by band 8 (15-31MHz), the get-by measures included shorting most of the anode load to bump anode volts and current up (down to 4k7 from 37k7) and connecting a boost circuit between anode and grid. Obviously, a bit of scratching-around going on.
I'm slightly suspicious of the comment in the manual that using the unused ECC85 section as cathode follower could be "interesting"- it's almost as if they had tried it and run into problems.... I'm scratching my head as to any single triode counterpart of the ECC85 as with the EC90/ECC82, maybe they were too. Maybe the 6BE6 was "usual" in the big US market and the bean-counters jibbed at the 6BA7? I sometimes have to remind myself when playing around with ex-professional sets that HM/US taxpayer stumped up for the bells and whistles, but with consumer goods, every farthing was being watched like a hawk. |
7th Jan 2018, 12:20 pm | #47 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,876
|
Re: Trio 9R-59 'pulling'
Sometimes the choice of devices in one radio is strongly influenced by what parts the firm is using in quantities in its other products. Maybe they already had a part number set up for the ECC85 in their FM receiver product line and had not set up one for any single triode?
You can't reverse-logic device choices by looking at just the one product. The EC90/6C4 oscillates very nicely in my EA12, and that uses the triode parts of the ECH81 mixers as oscillator buffers David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done |