UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Powered By Google Custom Search Vintage Radio and TV Service Data

Go Back   UK Vintage Radio Repair and Restoration Discussion Forum > Specific Vintage Equipment > Vintage Amateur and Military Radio

Notices

Vintage Amateur and Military Radio Amateur/military receivers and transmitters, morse, and any other related vintage comms equipment.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 6th Jun 2020, 6:55 am   #1
jimscoper
Triode
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Yalding, Maidstone, Kent, UK.
Posts: 35
Default WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

Been looking at German radio in early WW2 and I am a bit curious as to their use of transmitters and receivers in the 100KHz to 1.2MHz region. The Langwellen Sender 100/08 is an example.

Very well made etc but slap bang in the middle of broadcast bands when I would have expected them to use bands in the 4 to 9MHz region.

Why do this and did this actually work and did it die out early on or continue?
jimscoper is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2020, 12:25 pm   #2
Radio Wrangler
Moderator
 
Radio Wrangler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fife, Scotland, UK.
Posts: 22,869
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

Navigational beacons work well in that part of the spectrum, using groundwave propagation. In fact quite a few are still there.

David
__________________
Can't afford the volcanic island yet, but the plans for my monorail and the goons' uniforms are done
Radio Wrangler is online now  
Old 6th Jun 2020, 1:56 pm   #3
M0FYA Andy
Nonode
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Preston, Lancashire, UK.
Posts: 2,511
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

What frequencies did U-boat communications use?

Andy
M0FYA Andy is offline  
Old 6th Jun 2020, 2:17 pm   #4
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

HF, hence the Huff Duff direction finder https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-f...ection_finding
 
Old 17th Jun 2020, 7:05 am   #5
FrankB
Heptode
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olympia, Washington, USA.
Posts: 664
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

Most of the WW2 historical books I read mentioned the LF use of radio for U boat communications.
I know the U.S. uses- or did anyway- VLF for sub communications. You didn't need to surface to receive messages.
I -think- I read where some underseas beacons also use that frequency. Possibly for Tsunami warning system? or intruder detection).

The U.S. has a license free band on 180KC for experimentation and beacons. 1 watt max, and, IIRC, no more than 50' antenna, including lead in. ( See book: VLF Handbook for details, and a late '60s Popular Electronics had an article for a transmitter using a 12AX7 tube. Built one of those & it worked OK).
FrankB is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2020, 11:55 am   #6
Restoration73
Nonode
 
Restoration73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Surbiton, SW London, UK.
Posts: 2,801
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

I have also built the "Transmitter for the Neglected band" I used a EL84(6BQ5) in place
of the 6AQ5. My version has a vfo coverage of 130-570 kHz which permits use as LW
(and low MW) pantry transmitter, and also UK ham use on 136kHz and 475kHz bands.
There is an actual vintage transceiver in the link;
http://www.auroralchorus.com/pli/pli.htm
Restoration73 is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2020, 9:29 pm   #7
russell_w_b
Dekatron
 
russell_w_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Penrith, Cumbria, UK.
Posts: 3,687
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

Quote:
Originally Posted by M0FYA Andy View Post
What frequencies did U-boat communications use?
VLF after 1943, using the 'Goliath' system. 15kHz - 25kHz. Can't penetrate seawater with much else!
__________________
Regds,

Russell W. B.
G4YLI.
russell_w_b is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2020, 11:14 pm   #8
m0cemdave
Octode
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bletchley, Buckinghamshire, UK.
Posts: 1,219
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

You may have found this site already but if not, it may be helpful:

https://www.cdvandt.org/

including:

https://www.cdvandt.org/goliath.htm

There's a searchable index here (download the pdf and use control-F with key words to find which sections to look at):

https://www.cdvandt.org/subject_ref_dbase.htm

HTH
m0cemdave is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2020, 6:59 am   #9
M0SOE_Bruce
Pentode
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Deal, Kent, UK.
Posts: 139
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

It wasn't just the Germans. The UK developed the wireless set 14 in 1940 for armoured vehicles. It tuned 290-410 KHz.
M0SOE_Bruce is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2020, 9:46 am   #10
G6ONEDave
Octode
 
G6ONEDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Owston Ferry, North Lincolnshire, UK.
Posts: 1,701
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

I have a Marconi TF1331 oscilloscope, which I was told was used for looking at these VLF signals. The scope has positions 1, 3, 10 seconds on the timebase selector switch. It also has 1, 3, 10, 30, 100 and 300 msecs as well as 1, 3, 10, 30, 100 and 300 usecs. The scope seldom gets any use these days and would probably need a full service / restoration before it could be put back into service again.
G6ONEDave is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2020, 9:49 am   #11
jimscoper
Triode
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Yalding, Maidstone, Kent, UK.
Posts: 35
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

Thanks very much everyone. M0cemdave, I now know how to pass a dull wet afternoon - very interesting. I knew about VLF but it was going across the old Long and Medium Wave bands that surprised me.

The past is a different country.
jimscoper is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2020, 9:19 am   #12
G3VKM_Roger
Heptode
 
G3VKM_Roger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Southeast Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 773
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimscoper View Post
Thanks very much everyone. M0cemdave, I now know how to pass a dull wet afternoon - very interesting. I knew about VLF but it was going across the old Long and Medium Wave bands that surprised me.

The past is a different country.
I have HRO and HRO-50 receiver coil packs for 50 to 100 kHz but haven't heard anything identifiable. Anyone know if there is any activity in that band?

"The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there". One of my favourite opening lines, comes from the book "The Go-Between".

73

Roger/G3VKM

====================================
Just because your voice reaches halfway around the world doesn't mean you are wiser than when it reached only to the end of the bar. - Edward R. Murrow
G3VKM_Roger is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2020, 9:21 am   #13
Jon_G4MDC
Nonode
 
Jon_G4MDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK.
Posts: 2,015
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

Those coil packs will mostly cover the time stations MSF , DCF77 etc.
Not much fun to listen to.
Jon_G4MDC is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2020, 11:10 am   #14
trh01uk
Octode
 
trh01uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ross-on-Wye, Herefordshire, UK.
Posts: 1,652
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimscoper View Post
Been looking at German radio in early WW2 and I am a bit curious as to their use of transmitters and receivers in the 100KHz to 1.2MHz region. The Langwellen Sender 100/08 is an example.

Very well made etc but slap bang in the middle of broadcast bands when I would have expected them to use bands in the 4 to 9MHz region.

Why do this and did this actually work and did it die out early on or continue?
Simple really. They wanted good ground wave range, and as you go down in frequency that range improves - dramatically. Radio 4 long wave of course being a good example.

The British WS18 started life as a set covering 6 - 9MHz. Then came the same set but at a lower frequency of 3 to 5.2MHz (I think) - called the WS68. Then that set was reinvented as a WS68P covering 1.75 - 2.9MHz, again to get that better ground wave range.

It died out rapidly post-WWII because VHF sets came along, with FM rather than AM, and the improvement in voice quality, both from a good S/N ratio plus freedom from interference meant that ground wave on HF was really on its way out. Apparently the Americans turning up at D-Day with their BC-1000 sets (40 - 48MHz, FM) was a revelation - "this is how radios should work"!

Richard
trh01uk is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2020, 10:48 am   #15
73TORANA!
Triode
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 16
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

The LF band was used extensively by the RAAF in the pacific theatre. The Aircraft fitted with a 130 - 500Khz transmitter used a trailing antenna that had to be wound in prior to landing. The AWA AR8 AT5 LF / HF radio system designed and built here in Australia was used in Beauforts and Beaufighters in New Guinea / New Britain and coastal patrols of Australia areas for example. While the primary frequency was around 6800Khz, LF frequencies between 200 and 500 Khz were used.

Geoff.
73TORANA! is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2020, 4:45 am   #16
majoconz
Heptode
 
majoconz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ashhurst, Manawatu, New Zealand
Posts: 570
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

My best catch has been Palmerston North from Alice Springs 4293km 335kHz but heard only once - I keep trying! Often get Port McQuarie PMQ on 395kHz but I think he's gone QRT too - probably replaced with a VOR/DME. That was when I lived on top of a nice hill overlooking the town - unfortunately now I'm down in a valley!
__________________
Cheers - Martin ZL2MC
majoconz is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2020, 10:13 am   #17
73TORANA!
Triode
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 16
Default Re: WW2 use of low frequency transmitter

Unfortunately most NDB's have gone now here in Aus but I found mid winter is the best time.
Cheers Geoff
73TORANA! is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 1:50 am.


All information and advice on this forum is subject to the WARNING AND DISCLAIMER located at https://www.vintage-radio.net/rules.html.
Failure to heed this warning may result in death or serious injury to yourself and/or others.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2002 - 2023, Paul Stenning.