|
Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets. |
|
Thread Tools |
16th Jan 2020, 3:42 pm | #41 |
Octode
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 1,958
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
The DAC90A has the same output transformer as the DAC90, which uses a CL33 output valve. That valve (CL33) also has a Ra of 4,300 ohms, which may have inflenced the Bush designers to use a standard part for the DAC90A.
* Correction: The Mullard data sheet for the CL33 on the Radio Museum lists the Ra as 4500 ohms, so that implies a turns ratio of 39:1 The UL41 Ra is also listed as 3000 ohms for HT of 100V and 170V. Ron Last edited by ronbryan; 16th Jan 2020 at 3:54 pm. |
16th Jan 2020, 3:44 pm | #42 |
Heptode
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 900
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
PS: on the motor speed controller - I ordered a couple of speed controllers from ebay to see if they have better control at low speeds. I am wondering if running the speed controller at a higher voltage will help the low speed starting.
Thanks
__________________
Every Silver Lining Has Its Cloud https://youtube.com/channel/UCvBpiuUUnErJlNBm6DWb3Ww |
16th Jan 2020, 3:45 pm | #43 |
Heptode
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 900
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
Thanks Ron
I bet your correct. Making best use of a common parts bin and the valve won't care about the exact matching. Chris
__________________
Every Silver Lining Has Its Cloud https://youtube.com/channel/UCvBpiuUUnErJlNBm6DWb3Ww |
16th Jan 2020, 4:06 pm | #44 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
Just an observation from me, ri increases as the g2 voltage is reduced while the anode voltage remains the same, if you look at the valve data curves you can get some idea of what I mean:
http://www.r-type.org/pdfs/ul41.pdf The data for Class A operation gives ri as 20k for Va = Vg2 = 170 volts and Vg1 = -10.4 volts If you look at the Ia Va curves for Vg2 = 170 volts and do a quick ri calculation centered on a Va of 170 volts with Vg1 at -10 volts you will see that it approximates the 20k that was quoted. Now look at the Ia Va curves for Vg2 = 100 volts (approx. Vg2 voltage in the receiver) and do the same calculation centered on a Va of 190 volts (approx. Va voltage in the receiver) with Vg1 at -5 volts (approx. -Vg1 voltage in the receiver) you will see that ri has increased somewhat, I make it approx. 32k (ish) which is considerably higher than the 20k first quoted. Lawrence. |
16th Jan 2020, 4:45 pm | #45 |
Heptode
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 900
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
Hello Lawrence and Thanks
Thanks for the data sheet, that's the one I originally looked at when I got my 3000 figure. I don't really follow the maths on this but I will have a look through the graphs etc. But from the datasheet it says the optimum load is always roughly 3000. I think your saying the impedance value changes with anode current so will be constantsly changing anyway etc Unfortinately I do have a bad habit of mixing up my RA and Ra or is it ra. To be clear I am interrested in the load impedance not the anode impedance. (Lots for me to learn here) Thanks Chris
__________________
Every Silver Lining Has Its Cloud https://youtube.com/channel/UCvBpiuUUnErJlNBm6DWb3Ww Last edited by ChristianFletcher; 16th Jan 2020 at 4:52 pm. |
16th Jan 2020, 4:49 pm | #46 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,192
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
RL is the one of interest when calculating transformer ratios.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
16th Jan 2020, 6:01 pm | #47 |
Heptode
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 900
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
Doing a quick measurement of the impedance it’s about double what I was expecting. I wonder if anyone has tried these measurement in the past The last couple of transformers I have wound have both measured a similar factor out using a variety of impedance bridges and loads . I’m not going to loose sleep over it but it Is concerning when the theory doesn’t match the reality. This transformer is a perfect match into 1 Ohm if I had one speaker that is LOL
I’m pretty sure that I have wound the transformer with the same turns count and wire gauges etc. The results disappoint me! Chris
__________________
Every Silver Lining Has Its Cloud https://youtube.com/channel/UCvBpiuUUnErJlNBm6DWb3Ww |
16th Jan 2020, 6:02 pm | #48 |
Octode
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 1,869
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
The lack of a cathode bypass capacitor, giving current negative feedback, together with the very low screen grid voltage (about 90V in practice) modifies Ra - the load impedance.
Some time ago I tested some of Ed Dinning's transformers for this set, which were a very close match to the original. Perhaps he could confirm the turns ratio he used. Without extensive distortion testing, perhaps unwarranted on a budget radio, it's hard to get a difinitive answer. My feeling is that the Bush turns ratio is correct. A larger core would have been an enhancement, which would have improved reliability with thicker primary wire. Leon. |
16th Jan 2020, 6:23 pm | #49 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
The optimum load for a pentode, or beam tetrode, is approximately 0.9 x Vak/Ia. It is largely unaffected by whether the cathode resistor is bypassed; if there's overall negative feedback; etc.
The DAC90a actually runs the UL41 fairly gently, at less than its rated maximum figures. So the standing Ia is less than maximum. This means that the optimum load in the DAC90a will be greater than the data-sheet figure. It also means that the maximum output power will be less, of course. Presence of feedback would affect the 'looking backwards' impedance, and the damping that the valve imposes on the speaker (which as the valve's ra is high, is precious little for a pentode by itself anyway). But that is a minor concern. |
16th Jan 2020, 6:56 pm | #50 |
Heptode
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 900
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
Clearly I have a lot to learn LOL. All I can be sure of is the turns ratio that I used, was the same as the original transformer that I unwound and wire gauges were same as the original. Like most subject the rabbit hole goes deeper than expected when looking in from the outside etc.
Thanks so much for all the helpful comments and advice. My Best Regards Chris
__________________
Every Silver Lining Has Its Cloud https://youtube.com/channel/UCvBpiuUUnErJlNBm6DWb3Ww |
16th Jan 2020, 7:16 pm | #51 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
You might find the first bit of chapter 2 in this classic book is worth a read, chapter 2 section 2 pages 15 and 16 shows the basics of extracting a valves anode resistance, mutual conductance and amplification factor from its anode characteristics:
https://archive.org/details/RadioDes...dbook/page/n55 Lawrence. |
16th Jan 2020, 7:51 pm | #52 |
Heptode
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 900
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
Thanks Laurence that will be useful as I am thinking about trying to design a simple TRF from scratch as a project.
Chris
__________________
Every Silver Lining Has Its Cloud https://youtube.com/channel/UCvBpiuUUnErJlNBm6DWb3Ww |
16th Jan 2020, 7:51 pm | #53 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
Quote:
One method of being sure you have loaded the valve optimally, is 'scope the output, feed in 400Hz, wind up the level slowly, and if both peaks start being clipped symmetrically the load is about right. But as most pentodes go into clipping in a soggy manner, and when they do, the speaker cone's inertia tends to fill in the blanks anyway, it's not as useful as ideal theory would predict. |
|
16th Jan 2020, 8:26 pm | #54 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cornwall, UK.
Posts: 13,454
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
Quote:
Lawrence. |
|
16th Jan 2020, 11:45 pm | #55 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, UK.
Posts: 8,173
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
Hi Folks, I'm away from home at present so no access to my data. However I can say that several of these transformers were reverse engineered and the turns were pretty consistent. I'll let you know the numbers later.
I did find that the core was very similar to a modern EI 48 and I now use these bobbins instead of gluing up the old ones Kalee, can you confirm the bobbin size please? Ed |
17th Jan 2020, 8:36 am | #56 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cottingham, East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 5,737
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
This thread has the relevant information and diagrams:
https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/...ad.php?t=87213 Hope that’s useful.
__________________
David. BVWS Member. G-QRP Club member 1339. |
17th Jan 2020, 11:21 am | #57 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: Rewinding Bush DAC90 Audio Output Transformer
Quote:
I can't ATM! However, if Chris can measure the width of the central limb of his transformer laminations, we can work from that. One problem with transformers is, as a 'black art' not many people tackle them, so suppliers hardly exist who supply the bits in hobby quantities rather than industrial quantities. |
|