|
Vintage Amateur and Military Radio Amateur/military receivers and transmitters, morse, and any other related vintage comms equipment. |
|
Thread Tools |
16th Jun 2009, 7:09 pm | #1 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Philadelphia, USA
Posts: 1
|
SG Browns
Hi
Does anyone know if they still make these high-impedance headphones? Thery were legendary when I was a kid (like AVO 8s were) and a mate of mine had a pair once. I'd love to get a set, might be fun to build a decent quality "crystal" set again. Thx H |
16th Jun 2009, 10:16 pm | #2 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
Re: SG Browns
I had a pair once when I was a very enthusiastic and young SWL. I can still recall, even now, just how much they hurt my ears after about 30 minutes of wearing them!
Al. / Skywave |
16th Jun 2009, 10:24 pm | #3 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk, IP4, UK.
Posts: 21,288
|
Re: SG Browns
Quite right Al. I prefer a modern light weight headset. You can forget you're wearing it.
CaptainKernel. Crystal sets will work perfectly OK with low impedance headphones or a crystal earpiece. I know because I've tried it. I'm told that selectivity isn't as good, but I can't say I've noticed.
__________________
Graham. Forum Moderator Reach for your meter before you reach for your soldering iron. |
17th Jun 2009, 11:05 am | #4 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 638
|
Re: SG Browns
I have a pair of SG Brown headphones which are 3000R impedance. From what I have read these might be classed as low impedance! How high did the SG Brown phones go? Mine work a treat with my BC221 anyway. I concur with the comments about comfort though.
|
17th Jun 2009, 12:13 pm | #5 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: W.Butterwick, near Doncaster UK.
Posts: 8,932
|
Re: SG Browns
Most Hi Impedance are 2000 Ohms
David |
17th Jun 2009, 12:20 pm | #6 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Burton upon Trent, East Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 1,686
|
Re: SG Browns
I had a pair in the late '50s, but I remeber them being 4000 Ohms.
Alan |
17th Jun 2009, 12:42 pm | #7 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: W.Butterwick, near Doncaster UK.
Posts: 8,932
|
Re: SG Browns
Thats 2000 each earpiece,in series.
|
17th Jun 2009, 12:56 pm | #8 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Penrith, Cumbria, UK.
Posts: 3,687
|
Re: SG Browns
I have a pair of SGBs: 2000 Ohm. For some reason, they always commanded quite a price on the surplus market, incommensurate, I thought, with their quality (simple steel band, easily broken pin-pivots on the bakelite earpieces). I'm still quite fond of them, though.
I concur with Station X's findings about lo-Z cans on a crystal set - they work fine. Having said that, I've only used balanced-armature receivers, such as DLR5s, STCs and Airlite 62 ex-Military (receiver inset 4T variant, like used in type 700 series telephones) which are far more sensitive than the traditional stalloy diaphragm-type version. It's still possible to get DLR5s on the surplus market.
__________________
Regds, Russell W. B. G4YLI. |
17th Jun 2009, 1:04 pm | #9 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Burton upon Trent, East Staffordshire, UK.
Posts: 1,686
|
Re: SG Browns
Hamish,
I believe you are correct. This really is straining my memory, but I seem to remember that one wire went to each earpiece then one in a V shape between them. All in nicely twisted brown cotton covered, of course. I must look in the attic, just in case ..... Alan |
17th Jun 2009, 1:23 pm | #10 |
Nonode
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nuneaton, Warwickshire, UK.
Posts: 2,039
|
Re: SG Browns
|
17th Jun 2009, 1:30 pm | #11 | |
Nonode
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 2,543
|
Re: SG Browns
Quote:
As mentioned above they are incredibly uncomfortable, heavy and they'll fall off with any forward or backward tipping of the head..... but you've just got to put up with it for the sake of authenticity! David |
|
17th Jun 2009, 2:22 pm | #12 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chard, South Somerset, UK.
Posts: 7,457
|
Re: SG Browns
|
17th Jun 2009, 2:51 pm | #13 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Doncaster, South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 385
|
Re: SG Browns
Hi.
Well to make headphones more sensertive I would cut a disk out of thin mica then cut out of a u/s steel disk a 1/2" round then stick it to the mica. Realy works. Pete G4MRU |
17th Jun 2009, 4:06 pm | #14 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North Wiltshire, UK.
Posts: 638
|
Re: SG Browns
|
17th Jun 2009, 4:20 pm | #15 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Skelleftea, Sweden
Posts: 250
|
Re: SG Browns
actually, a good matching transformer and a pair of KOSS sparkplugs (wired in series by only using the tip and ring) is likely better than 99% of those SG browns.
here is some more on that. http://www.schmarder.com/radios/misc...ransformer.htm http://www.crystalradio.net/soundpow...ng/index.shtml |
17th Jun 2009, 4:35 pm | #16 |
Retired Dormant Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Shropshire, UK.
Posts: 3,051
|
Re: SG Browns
SGBs turn up pretty regularly at 'antique' stalls around here. You shouldn't have much trouble finding a pair at a sensible price, once you've convinced the stallholder that the BBC label doesn't mean that they were actually used by the BBC
|
18th Jun 2009, 1:33 pm | #17 | |
Octode
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Littlehampton, West Sussex, UK.
Posts: 1,465
|
Re: SG Browns
Quote:
Nothing to do with me I might add. Jim |
|