|
Components and Circuits For discussions about component types, alternatives and availability, circuit configurations and modifications etc. Discussions here should be of a general nature and not about specific sets. |
|
Thread Tools |
23rd Jun 2017, 10:39 pm | #1 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hexham, Northumberland, UK.
Posts: 2,234
|
Battery type numbers
I'm sure most of us have become familiar with common domestic battery sizes and type numbers over the years. e.g. AAA, AA, C, and D cells. I wonder why there never was an A or B size? There is also a gap between D and N size cells. Was the standardization a European thing when type numbers changed from U2, HP11 etc? PP3s seemed to have kept their original number but I think there is an equivalent MNxxxx sometimes referred to on equipment labels. I can't remember the predecessor of the PJ996 6V lantern battery.
Alan. |
23rd Jun 2017, 10:49 pm | #2 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Wigan, Greater Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,428
|
Re: Battery type numbers
A little light reading, answers some of your questions. There is an A type listed.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battery_sizes Frank |
23rd Jun 2017, 11:08 pm | #3 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fakenham, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 4,246
|
Re: Battery type numbers
"For example, British standard "U" series batteries were often sold under manufacturer prefixes such as "C", "SP", "HP", etc.; Ever Ready sold "U2" (D) batteries as "SP2" (standard-duty zinc carbon) and "HP2" (heavy duty zinc chloride)."
As I recall, the SP2 (earlier LP2 for "leakproof", then SP2 for "sealed") and high power HP2 existed alongside the standard, blue cardboard jacketed U2. Again as I recall, 50 years ago the common lantern battery was already designated 996 in Ever Ready's range - I expect it goes back rather further than that. Paul |
24th Jun 2017, 12:42 am | #4 |
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hexham, Northumberland, UK.
Posts: 2,234
|
Re: Battery type numbers
Thanks for the link Frank. I never thought about looking on the web for information. A useful list. I had forgotten all about the F size cell. Paul, you've brought some memories of my childhood back. I remember that battery leakage seemed to be a big thing in those days.
Alan. |
24th Jun 2017, 1:11 am | #5 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Worksop, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Posts: 5,549
|
Re: Battery type numbers
Battery leakage is still as bad as that even now.
|
24th Jun 2017, 5:11 am | #6 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Biggin Hill, London, UK.
Posts: 5,191
|
Re: Battery type numbers
If you consider the Ever Ready (UK) numbers for a moment...
For U (Unit?) cells there was U2 (=D), U7 and U12 (=AA), U11 (=C), U16 (==AAA) and at least the much less common U8, U10 and U14 (the coke-can sized one with a screw thread round the top of the can that was used on gas lighers). What about all the other numbers? What about U1, U3, U4, U5.... I seem to remember the N size cell was a D23. Why not a U<number>? Wasn't the D14 also an AA size cell? And for AD (All Dry?) low tension batteries there was an AD4, AD28, AD35, etc but plenty of gaps in the sequence. Did the others ever exist? Was there any logic to the numbering at all? |
24th Jun 2017, 7:15 am | #7 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Colchester, Essex, UK.
Posts: 4,081
|
Re: Battery type numbers
It's all a bit of a mess- almost as bad as coin cell nomenclature- lack of logic, co-operation between territories and several different reference numbers for the same cell.
|
24th Jun 2017, 7:41 am | #8 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lynton, N. Devon, UK.
Posts: 7,061
|
Re: Battery type numbers
Maybe the person who designated battery size numbers went on to work at Microsoft... Windows 1; Windows 2; Windows 3; Windows 95; Windows 98; Windows XP; Windows 2000; Windows 7; Windows 8; Windows 10. Not much logic there!
The lithium coin cell numbers do have some logic to them, CR2032 for instance is 20mm diameter, 3.2mm thick, rather than being part of a sequence starting at CR1. So if you know the CR number, you can work out the size. The letter-designated cell types seem to generally go that as the letter moves on, the size gets bigger. So A, B, C, D etc... with A and B size not being common. Smaller than A size, it's AA, then AAA - the logic looks copied from Standard Wire Gauge logic - wire larger than 0SWG is 00SWG; then 000SWG, etc. Once you get above 1SWG, the larger the number, the smaller the wire - the SWG number is the number of drawing operations needed to reduce the diameter. JEDEC transistor numbers are both logical and random - 2N706 for instance, the 2 before the N is one less than the number of leads (why?). Diodes are 1N; dual-gate MOSFETS are 3N; bipolar transistors, unijnction transistors, JFETs are all 2N. But the number AFTER the N is just the next in sequence from a big register as a manufacturer wanted to list a new type, so bears no relation to what it does. |
24th Jun 2017, 8:19 am | #9 | |
Octode
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Posts: 1,958
|
Re: Battery type numbers
Quote:
There was an AD1, which was used in the Roberts RP4 portable. Ron |
|
24th Jun 2017, 9:35 am | #10 | ||
Dekatron
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fakenham, Norfolk, UK.
Posts: 4,246
|
Re: Battery type numbers
Quote:
Quote:
Paul |
||
24th Jun 2017, 9:39 am | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Middlewich, Cheshire, UK. & Winter in the Philippines.
Posts: 3,897
|
Re: Battery type numbers
Watch type battery numbers are a dog's breakfast too.
Sam. |
24th Jun 2017, 10:06 am | #12 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 27,788
|
Re: Battery type numbers
I'm pretty sure that the AAA/AA/C/D nomenclature was an American standard which gradually spread elsewhere. It has only been widely used in the UK for the last 20 years or so. Info on this is surprisingly difficult to find though.
|
24th Jun 2017, 10:31 am | #13 |
Dekatron
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Colchester, Essex, UK.
Posts: 4,081
|
Re: Battery type numbers
In agree they have cracked it with the lithium 'coins' since the seemingly standardised nomenclature tells you the diameter and thickness.
With the chunkier button/watch cells, quite apart from being concerned with the chemistry- do you have alkaline, zinc air, silver oxide,etc, The convention to label the alkalines with AG prefixes annoys me as i interpret it as a hint to the unwary that they are (slightly superior) silver oxide. I recently pulled a rotten orange HP2 from an old piece of equipment, it had totally covered itself in large grains of rust powder however hadn't affected any of the metal surrounding it. In perfect condition on top of the rust was a woolworths price label for 9p. I had forgotten that these were sold singly in the early seventies. Last edited by The Philpott; 24th Jun 2017 at 10:51 am. Reason: x |
25th Jun 2017, 11:28 am | #14 | |
Dekatron
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cottingham, East Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 5,738
|
Re: Battery type numbers
Quote:
Interesting to note the information about silver oxide ‘coin cells’, (as used in digital callipers), which provide 1.55V as compared to cheaper alkaline cells at 1.5V, and that silver oxide typically 50% greater capacity and a flatter discharge rate. In the thread below about Aldi digital callipers at post #30 I’m mentioned that the ‘AG’ type alkaline cells which come on a card from Poundland et al aren’t really up to the task. The instructions for my ‘Clarke’ callipers state must be 1.55V SR44 silver oxide call, and that if all five digits flash simultaneously the battery voltage has fallen below 1.45V so the battery needs replacement. I’ve got three sets of calipers, and non work for long on AG cells so I buy Renata Swiss made silver oxide ones which last a year or so, depending on use. https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/...=133337&page=2 Here’s a clip about silver oxide and alkaline coin cells from Wiki: 8-< In the IEC designations, cell types with an "SR" prefix use silver oxide chemistry and provide 1.55 volts, while the "LR" prefix batteries use alkaline chemistry and provide 1.5 volts. Common alternative manufacturer's prefixes for these two types are "SG" for silver oxide and "AG" for alkaline. Since there are no "common" names beyond the AG designation, many vendors use these four designations interchangeably for the same physical sized cell. The functional differences are that silver oxide batteries typically have 50% greater capacity than alkaline chemistry, relatively slowly declining voltage during discharge compared to alkaline types of the same size, and superior leakage resistance. The ultimate energy capacity of a silver battery may be as much as twice that of an alkaline. Also, a silver cell with a flat discharge characteristic is preferable for devices that need a steady voltage, such as photographic light meters, and devices that will not operate below a certain voltage; for example, some digital calipers, which do not work below 1.38V. Alkaline batteries are usually cheaper than silver oxide equivalents. Inexpensive devices are sometimes supplied fitted with alkaline batteries, although they would benefit from the use of silver oxide batteries. Exhausted silver oxide cells are often recycled to recover their precious metal content, whereas depleted alkaline cells are discarded with household trash or recycled, depending on the local practices. SR44 1.55V 8-< https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battery_sizes As to obsolete batteries, the 6 Volt ‘PP8’ was used in sets such as the Roberts RT1. I guess some owners change the connections to suit 4 x AA cells, but artwork for the PP8 is available to make a nice replica to preserve the appearance. (It’s on the ‘to do’ list! )
__________________
David. BVWS Member. G-QRP Club member 1339. |
|
29th Jun 2017, 11:36 am | #15 | |
Octode
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Posts: 1,453
|
Re: Battery type numbers
Quote:
Certainly in my youth they were usually called HP whatever even though different manufacturers used different numbers — I'm too young to remember Ux. I do recall SPxs changing from white to a blue casing though. I seem to recall that Vidor used the same figures as Ever Ready but prefixed V. |
|
29th Jun 2017, 1:33 pm | #16 |
Nonode
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Milton Keynes, Bucks. UK.
Posts: 2,552
|
Re: Battery type numbers
This thread has stirred me enough to go into my loft and get down a box of batteries that I bought from "Eveready Boy" and it's full of Ever Ready batteries. In the box is are various & common Ever Ready batts, some of them show different identifications, i.e. the change in type numbers over the years.
Once I get a chance I'll list them & take photos and I'll report back
__________________
When I die, please don't let my Wife sell my collection for the amount I told her I paid for it! |